The entertainment industry has always been full of various controversies and gossip, and recently, Ge Siqi broke the news that Big S's privacy incident was then sued by Big S in court, which attracted widespread attention. This article will deeply analyze the history of Ge Siqi's revelation of the big S privacy incident and possible compensation disputes.
Ge Siqi is a well-known paparazzi in the entertainment industry, he publicly broke the news on social media: Huang Ziling broke the news that Big S took drugs, and then Big S sued Ge Siqi, it can be said that Ge Siqi is acting as a substitute for Huang Ziling, a miserable word.
Faced with Ge Siqi's revelations, Big S decided to take legal action to protect his rights and interests. She filed a lawsuit against Ge Siqi and demanded 4 million yuan as compensation for moral damage and reputational damages. Big S believes that Ge Siqi's revelation violated her right to privacy and reputation, and caused irreparable damage to her personal image and family.
During the legal proceedings, the court will hear the evidence and arguments of the parties and finally make a judgment. If the court finds that Ge Siqi's revelation constitutes infringement, she may be liable for compensation. According to the request of Big S, Ge Siqi may need to pay 4 million yuan as compensation for moral damage and reputational damages. However, the final amount of compensation will depend on the court's judgment and assessment of the case.
This incident has sparked a discussion about the moral and legal boundaries of words and deeds of insiders in the entertainment industry. The privacy and reputation rights of celebrities should be protected, and whether insiders' revelations are legal and ethical is a controversial issue. The outcome of this incident will have an important impact on the words and deeds norms and legal responsibilities of insiders in the entertainment industry.
Ge Siqi broke the news that the big S privacy incident is not just an ordinary gossip rumor, but involves legal disputes and compensation disputes. The final outcome of compensation will depend on the court's judgment and assessment of the case. Regardless of the outcome, this incident reminds us that in the entertainment industry, we must respect the privacy and reputation rights of others, and also pay attention to the norms and legal boundaries of insiders.