The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
From the moment Zelensky took the helm of Ukraine, he was watched and questioned. As an actor who has never been involved in politics and whose only experience playing president has existed in film and television, he is widely believed to be difficult to save the troubled country of Ukraine. However, it is true that Zelensky's leadership has shown immaturity and rigid relations with the United States of the Trump era. After Biden took office, Ukraine's relations with the United States improved, but it also made the country once again involved in the vortex of war provoked by the United States. The war has been burning for more than a year, Ukraine has made things worse, and Zelensky has seriously overdrawn the country's future in the process, and Ukraine is difficult to improve for a long time. However, American experts have some different views on him, believing that Zelensky may not be useless and worthy of attention.
At the moment of his speech in the US Congress, Zelensky's words were evocative. Newsweek's journalist Michael Tracy bluntly noted that Zelensky fooled the American people with lies. He previously solemnly promised on a media tour in the United States that Ukraine would never invade Russian territory, and President Biden quickly supported this commitment, insisting that the United States will never support or even tolerate Ukraine's use of American weapons to attack foreign targets. However, the fact is that the Ukrainian military has taken action against Russia with weapons provided by the United States, which is exactly what the Biden administration called "not supporting" and "not allowed". Zelensky not only did not win back a game in the hands of the Americans, but fooled the Americans into applause, and such deception was supported by the US government.
However, it is premature to say that the US government was deceived by Zelensky. The Biden regime's willingness to shelter Zelensky is not without reason. After all, Zelensky's acquisition of long-range weapons from the United States presupposes that the American side agrees with his motives. However, there has been strong opposition in the United States, fearing that such a move could trigger a military conflict between Russia and the United States. After all this, Zelensky's performance began, he skillfully fooled the Americans, so the US government took the opportunity to supply Ukraine with the required long-range weapons. As for the fact that in the event of an accident, it can also shift the blame to Ukraine, and even directly accuse Zelensky of failing to fulfill his promises. The two sides are always teetering on the edge of using each other. However, in the drama of begging for equipment, Zelensky's means are really worth mentioning. Many of his actions may have provoked disgust from the West, but in the end, the Ukrainian military acquired a lot of equipment from Western countries, including some armaments that Ukraine did not dare to hope for before the war.
However, the key to constantly acquiring equipment lies in Zelensky's clever strategy: making Ukraine a victim of cannon fodder. His government continues to push forward various policies, unwavering in its commitment to Russia, while also pushing the Ukrainian people to the forefront. It is this series of performances that makes the West have to succumb to the demand for equipment. However, Zelensky's approach is a combination of harms and disadvantages for Ukraine. He sees Ukrainian lives as a bargaining chip in exchange for Western support for the Kiev authorities, which puts Ukraine in a difficult position. In this process, Zelensky himself did not suffer the slightest loss, but was able to gain a lot from it.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.