The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
In 2017, a hip-hop show emerged in China, and a special existence named Ouyang Jing flashed on the stage and was named a hip-hop man. At that time, the domestic rappers had not yet gained the prestige and status they have today, but they poured 500% of their reverence and admiration into Ouyang Jing, although he failed to advance to the final. Six years later, the 2023 Chinese rap pinnacle showdown once again showcases Ouyang Jing, and his return is in the spotlight. However, in the past six years, domestic rappers have emerged, making people wonder, do they still have reverence for Ouyang Jing?
In the eyes of the audience, Ouyang Jing is still the idol who inspired a generation of rappers. When he returned to the stage, rappers seemed to return to their original confused years, excited. However, time flies, and everything is changing, especially their mentality.
In the evaluation link, Che Che jokingly called Ouyang Jing "an old man who is about to retire", which may be a joke, but it also reveals some doubts about Ouyang Jing. Compared with today's imposing young rapper, Ouyang Jing's stage aura seems to be a little bleak.
A quote from Alfgeni in particular highlights this change in mindset. Like Ouyang Jing, Alfgeni disappeared after having hip-hop in China and only returned to the stage in 2023 and directly challenged Ouyang Jing. He explained that the reason why he chose this was on the one hand out of respect, and on the other hand, to show Ouyang Jing the difference in his current peak stage and strength. Although this sentence was said in the interview, it exudes Alfgeni's confidence and challenging spirit. He seemed to think that Ouyang Jing's things were outdated, at least on the stage of the peak duel, he could easily defeat Ouyang Jing. Sure enough, in the game, Alfgeni proved his point with an outstanding performance and defeated Ouyang Jing by 30 points.
Although Ouyang Jing excelled in terms of technique, ranking first among the 24 rappers, his lack of stage performance became a clear disadvantage. The peak showdown not only tests rap skills, but also emphasizes the stage effect, which is Ouyang Jing's shortcoming. This is also reminiscent of the third season of the talk show, where Zhou Qimo, despite his industry-leading strength and qualifications, was out of the first round and was still respected by other rappers. However, in the fourth season, Zhou Qimo adjusted himself and eventually won the championship. Perhaps Ouyang Jing can have a similar turnaround and breakthrough, but everything will take time to prove.
Finally, Xie Di frankly said that he would vote for Afgeni, and although he is also a fan of Ouyang Jing, he mentioned a key point - culture needs to evolve and cannot be stuck in the past. This change in mentality is normal, as Alfgeni said, when he was a child, he watched Ouyang Jing's information in magazines, but now he can defeat him on the stage, everything is like a dream. Progress and development is the process of making dreams come true, and this process is full of challenges and opportunities.
To sum up, although Ouyang Jing is still highly respected, with the passage of time and the rise of a new generation of rappers, his status and influence may not be the same as before. On the stage of China's rap pinnacle showdown, he faces huge challenges and needs to constantly adapt and improve to remain competitive. This is also a vivid portrayal of Chinese hip-hop culture, a cultural inheritance that is constantly changing and evolving.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.