"Follow" and we'll talk more together
As the highest academic title in China's science and technology, academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences represents not only national recognition, but also a symbol of lifelong honor.
Every worker engaged in scientific research is working hard to become an academician.
However, although academicians represent honor, they also need to shoulder responsibilities.
It is worth noting that some time ago, the Chinese Academy of Sciences issued 5 bans to prevent academicians from being "brick families".
However, because of this matter, some people are anxious, what is going on?
1. Code of conduct for academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
It is reported that the Chinese Academy of Sciences has published a new version of the Code of Conduct for Academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
This is the first time that the Chinese Academy of Sciences has revised this specification since 2014.
Compared to the previous version of 26 articles, this time the specification has increased to 33 articles.
Some of the content has been modified and divided into three categories, many sub-items.
The new version of the specification requires that while cultivating scientific research teams, scientific research activities also need to be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the specification.
Mainly responsible for their main responsibilities and main business, and play an academic leading role.
For serving academicians, I need to engage in front-line scientific research in professional fields and solve practical problems in front-line scientific research.
At the same time, it also stipulates the treatment of academicians, especially for the part-time work of academicians, and requires academicians not to seek improper benefits.
In addition, the part-time work of academicians also needs to be reasonably planned and must not be part-time outside the main scientific research activities.
It is also necessary to do a good job in keeping secrets and resist unhealthy tendencies.
Judging from the latest code of conduct, it is mainly in Kuang Zheng's current academician circles that are bad, especially when it comes to scientific research.
The situation in the past has a great impact on the development of science and technology and social development.
In particular, some academicians, relying on the name of their own academicians, have become "brick families" outside.
Second, academicians should be "brick families"
The title of academician is not only an honor, but also a symbol of authority.
Academicians have always been regarded as the wealth of the country, and what they say is considered more authoritative.
Therefore, academicians themselves also need to take responsibility and responsibility, and they must also be responsible for what they say, and cannot blindly follow money.
Before the implementation of the new specification, because there were many loopholes in the specification and there were not many restrictions on academicians, the binding nature of the academician group was reduced.
At this time, some academicians were tempted by interests and began to do things for "money", not taking a little responsibility for what they said, and even helping some enterprises to seek improper interests.
As science has a factual basis and is the only form of testing objective things, its authority and systematization are beyond doubt.
As academicians, as people who practice scientific principles, the public's trust in them is also very high.
However, some academicians violated scientific principles and chose to stand on the side of interests, and even more unrealistically said.
These academicians are experts on the surface, but in fact they are out-and-out "brick makers".
As similar situations continue to grow, the code of conduct for academicians also needs to be further managed.
The implementation of this new norm not only revised the academician specification, but also added 5 prohibitions, preventing academicians from becoming "brick families".
3. 5 new bans
In this specification, from scientific research activities, social activities to co-optation work, amendments have been made, and a prohibited behavior has been added, which has not appeared before.
For this increase in prohibited behavior, the purpose is obviously to fundamentally put an end to some of the behaviors of academicians.
Especially when interests are involved, it also protects the interests of the public.
Article 1: Academicians are prohibited from participating in activities that damage the reputation of academicians.
Including seeking improper interests with the title of academician, participating in academic activities and journals outside the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
At the same time, it is also forbidden to participate in academic activities of a social nature, and it is not allowed to name non-academic activities as academicians.
This is well understood, that is, it avoids the abuse of the title of academician.
Article 2: Academicians are prohibited from publicly expressing opinions unrelated to their own profession.
This involves evaluation, consultation and valuation outside the area of expertise, and is prohibited for recommending a project.
In addition, violations of the principle of confidentiality and fairness are not allowed, which also guarantees the fairness and impartiality of relevant activities.
Article 3 prohibits improper conduct in the co-election of academicians.
As a lifelong honor, academicians are of great significance to researchers, and the annual co-election of academicians will be a competition in the academic community.
This can also lead to a lot of misconduct, including unprincipled recommendations.
In the new norms, intercession and greeting are eliminated, and the exchange of interests is avoided.
Article 4: It is forbidden to communicate with candidates about co-optation work.
In the past, in the process of co-opting academicians, some academicians contacted the co-opters through various channels for various reasons and disclosed their internal information.
This provision is also for this purpose, avoiding some improper behavior in the reinforcement of academicians and reducing the number of favored academicians.
Article 5: It is forbidden to disclose any situation in the selection process to others.
The co-selection of academicians is very important, not only related to the attribution of the title of academician, but also will bring a new blood to the field of scientific research.
While prohibiting the leakage of the selection, it also prohibits the unauthorized publication of information on the Internet, avoiding some problems in the co-optation process.
Fourth, the role of the new norm
The five prohibited behaviors in the latest norms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences are not only clear in structure, but also clearly define the scope.
It makes clear requirements for the remarks of academicians, and prohibits academicians from publishing some non-professional theoretical opinions.
In the past, many academicians acted as expert representatives of certain enterprises for various reasons, thereby misleading all sectors of society.
However, some people believe that the new norms have too many requirements for academicians, which will not affect the co-selection of future academicians.
In fact, this worry is superfluous, academicians, as a symbol of honor, will naturally have a steady influx of talents.
And honor is not only honor, but also needs to make academicians understand their responsibilities.
For the prohibition of academicians from expressing non-professional opinions to the outside world, it is also a clear indication that they are non-professional opinions, and it is not necessary to "ban academicians".
As long as it is in line with the professional field studied by academicians, it is natural that you can speak freely and will not be subject to any restrictions.
As for why there is such a regulation, in fact, the reason is very simple, that is, to let academicians be cautious in their words and deeds.
In a similar situation before, some people, after being elected as academicians, began to think highly of themselves, believing that they also had a say outside the professional field, and often faced the public with a "hundred Xiaosheng" attitude.
In addition to being keen on giving speeches everywhere, he also helps enterprises seek benefits through profit transmission and obtain a large amount of improper income.
In addition to conscious behavior, there are people who are unconscious and often act as experts in areas they do not understand.
Although it is impossible to judge whether his opinion is true or false, because of his status as an academician, the public does not dare to doubt it.
This is followed by false rumors, and there are many serious consequences due to misleading.
As a professional in the field of scientific research, an academician is not a general existence of all trades, and in some fields may not be as good as ordinary people.
Therefore, controlling his speech is also a favorable behavior, which not only avoids the public's blind trust in academicians, but also prevents the emergence of vicious behavior.
Fundamentally, it also allows academicians to return to the profession itself.
Fifth, someone is starting to be anxious
Although the purpose of the new specifications released this time is to allow academicians to focus more on research in the field of scientific research, it has caused dissatisfaction among some people.
Among them, some people said that banning academicians from speaking is undoubtedly too broad.
This obviously "anxious" remark has also aroused people's attention, why are academicians not in a hurry?
The answer lies in these five prohibitions.
Banning academicians from speaking in the name of academicians can be said to cut off the wealth of some people.
In the past, some enterprises contacted academicians through various means, hoping to let academicians "endorse" their products.
Among them, there are also cases of academicians being endorsed to obtain more benefits.
Today, the new norms prohibit academicians from going to the cave in private, which puts an end to the improper behavior of academicians and society, and also completely cuts off the means of making money for lawbreakers.
Therefore, after the introduction of the new norms, it is natural to be the first to jump out and oppose, wanting to use the voice of public opinion to force the relevant prohibitions to exist in name only, and the purpose is also obvious.
In addition, there are people who seek the position of academician.
Previously, you could learn the inside story of the co-optation of academicians through means such as invitations.
However, in this new regulation, academician groups are also prohibited from disclosing relevant information in violation of regulations, and communication with candidates is prohibited.
This also makes some people who want to become academicians by going through the back door anxious, and naturally express dissatisfaction with this.
After the Chinese Academy of Sciences issued the latest code of conduct for academicians, some people said that the Chinese Academy of Engineering should also issue a ban.
In fact, the Chinese Academy of Engineering has long issued a similar ban, and academicians of the Chinese Academy of Engineering have also made requirements.
Therefore, the new norms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences should have been implemented a long time ago.
As the wealth of the country, academicians must not only be responsible for themselves, but also responsible for society, and at the same time, they must clearly recognize their own positioning.
The 5 prohibitions in the new norms are actually the most basic principles, and if even these cannot be observed, then it is really worthy of the title of academician.
epilogue
To sum up, the 5 prohibitions of the new norms for academicians give normative requirements for the behavior of academicians from many aspects.
Allowing academicians to focus on their main business and correct their attitude can also improve the speed of progress in the field of scientific research.
And under the implementation of the new norms, academicians can also play their leading role to promote academic progress.
Do you think the new ban will do much?