He Jiong's sincerity and fan feelings
He Jiong, as a well-known host and actor in the Chinese entertainment industry, has always infected countless audiences and fans with his sincerity, enthusiasm and positive image. His hosting style is lively and humorous, deeply loved by the audience, and has won honorary titles many times and is respected as "model worker". He has not only gained a place in the entertainment industry, but also actively participated in public welfare activities and contributed to the society with his influence.
He Jiong suffered a serious "rollover" incident
Recently, however, He Jiong was embroiled in a serious controversy. The incident was caused by Su Yu, Ho's former nanny, who reported that he had been in arrears of wages for three years. This report raised questions about He Jiong's true image, and also caused widespread attention and discussion.
Su Yu's report claimed that she was not paid for a long time while working as a nanny in He Jiong's home. This has raised suspicions about whether He Jiong owes wages to employees, especially considering that he has always been a public image representative who actively participates in public welfare activities.
Ambiguity in the incident
However, there are many uncertainties in this incident that require further investigation and explanation. First of all, Su Yu claimed in the report that He Jiong owed wages for three years, but why she chose to expose the issue at this time instead of raising it earlier, which raised people's questions. Second, details such as the specifics of wage arrears and the existence of written contracts remain vague.
The judgment of the court of first instance and He Jiong's appeal
In this incident, the court of first instance issued a judgment, requiring He Jiong to pay Su Yu's arrears of wages. The verdict caused quite a stir in public opinion, with some people supporting the court's decision that the legitimate rights and interests of employees should be protected, while others were shocked and disappointed by Ho's image.
However, He Jiong did not accept the judgment of the court of first instance, but chose to appeal. He said that he did not owe Su Yu's salary, was dissatisfied with the first-instance verdict, and firmly believed that he would be treated fairly. This move also angered Su Yu and some people who supported her, and the complexity of the incident was further aggravated.
Su Yu asked for legal person remuneration, real estate and cars
As the incident developed, Su Yu put forward more requirements, including legal person compensation, real estate and cars. This series of requests has sparked widespread controversy and discussion. Some people believe that Su Yu's request is too excessive, and may just be to seek more benefits. Others believe that if He Jiong does have the problem of arrears of wages, then he should be responsible for the legitimate rights and interests of employees, and should not reduce the problem to a monetary dispute.
Public opinion tends to support He Jiong
Despite the many controversies and questions in the incident, most public opinion seems to be inclined to support He Jiong. His sincerity and hard work over the years, as well as his active participation in public welfare undertakings, have left a deep impression on his audience and fans. Many believe it is unlikely that he willfully defaulted on employees' wages and expect a just resolution of the matter.
The incident could have an impact on Ho's reputation
Although public opinion generally supports He Jiong, the incident may have a certain impact on his reputation. After all, the incident has already attracted widespread attention in the public eye and involved a report from a former employee. In the future, Ho Jiong may need more time and effort to restore his image, regardless of the eventual outcome of the incident, calling on the public to remain rational and patient and wait for a just ruling.
Summary:
Whether or not He Jiong is ultimately judged to be the party responsible for wage arrears, this incident teaches us to remain rational and objective, and not to jump to conclusions. A person's image and hard work over the years should not be obliterated by one incident. We should hope that this incident can finally find the truth and protect the legitimate rights and interests of every employee, and at the same time remind the public not to worship stars too blindly, but to look at each incident rationally and pursue justice impartially. It is also a call for social justice and the rule of law.