Recently, a video of a 2-year-old girl and an aunt grabbing seats in a restaurant caused an online scolding war.
At the beginning of the video, a girl about 2 years old is looking at her mobile phone on a table of four. After a strange aunt came in, she sat down opposite the little girl with a bowl and chopsticks.
After a short while, the little girl looked up and found that there was an aunt sitting opposite her, a little unhappy, so she pointed to a table in front of the store and asked her to sit there.
The aunt did not sit as the girl requested, but teased the child and said, "Do you have four butts", which made the little girl's emotions collapse at once, and she cried and looked for her mother everywhere.
Under the child's cry, her mother finally returned, and the child said aggrievedly: I can't find my mother. This incident was later posted on the Internet by the girl's mother, and the aunt who "grabbed the seat with the little girl" was denounced online. Unexpectedly, this denunciation triggered an online scolding war.
From the video, it can be seen that the aunt of the shop carefully watches over the little girl all the way, and the girl's mother can get the video and send it out, and you can almost know that this restaurant belongs to the girl and her mother. It is precisely because of this layer of identity that this scolding war has become particularly hot.
A: The current Internet atmosphere is standing for children, right? Same as high-speed rail before? If a child is young and does not understand things, he can put aside the facts, and the whole world has to revolve around you, right? No one thinks that only ta can have children.
B: Is this thinking that your family is a princess? If you want your daughter to be a princess, you have to be a queen, and if you don't have a queen's life, don't raise your daughter as a princess. Teach it yourself, people are customers, people can sit.
C: The store's mother is not a good bird in the first place, and she specially sent a video to try to abuse the Internet, which is even more uneasy and kind. How can such a person teach children, it's all the fault of this world.
D: You don't think your child is right, do you? Is that seat bought by your family (or really), one person has to occupy four positions, you don't want to be too outrageous, that seat is empty that anyone can sit, children don't understand why you leave? You should help explain it to passers-by. Also weird people and two-year-old children calculate, obviously your child first calculated with others, do you know?
：
E: It means that one can occupy a table alone, the child is right, the customer insists on sitting right, the mistake is that the owner mother should guide the child correctly, not to expose the customer to guide public opinion! The child does not let the grandmother around, you say that this is the child's problem, or the mother's problem!
E1: When the woman sat down at first, the child didn't react, and the customer might think she was sitting there playing, and she was obviously not eating. Later, she was not happy, children are too young to recognize that it is normal to be different from adults, but her mother released this process and accused customers and children of calculating. If you're eating out and a child has to sit somewhere else, wouldn't it be inexplicable?
F: Customers can sit wherever they want, come to your store to spend money and can't sit there, but the owner should talk to the little girl, obviously the little girl still does not understand, parents do not teach but blame the customer. It is a love for customers to help you coax your daughter, and it is not a duty not to coax, not who sends a video is justified.
G: Isn't it normal for such a small store to share a table, you are all like this, if you share a table with the person next to you, you are not allowed to enter the screen to scare people, the store owner is the talent, this thing is actually directly exposed. Shops that are open for business in public and vexatious, and pick customers, close early.
H: The most outrageous thing here is the store, you are a service industry in the case of the other party is not a big mistake, try to guide others to explode customers, the second outrageous is the customer, accommodating such a cute child is nothing, of course, I don't want to accommodate, I don't comment, the problem is that the store is obviously not happy, what are you still sitting there for, it's me who turned around and left, spending money to suffer your ghostly anger.
I: What does it mean, open a store to do business, not customer-oriented? This would have been a four-seater. If you don't want to do business, close your doors. Why are people now not having good brains, and you still think you are reasonable? Did people beat your child or scold your child? Spend money on a belly of gas. Is it allowed by someone else? Just hang the video on the Internet, want to abuse people online?
J: If both parties are customers and I stand on the girl, and the result is that the store does not allow customers to sit in empty seats, because the baby daughter wants to occupy this table to watch TV, and also sends out to want to abuse customers online, then the store has a bigger problem.
K: When you meet someone who likes children, you may rely on children (maybe I also walk away silently, one is that the child can understand, and the other is that more is better than less). Boss, can't you give the guest a free order or something, and then discuss? Send this video to accuse? Let everyone criticize her? Something wrong, otherwise you fence it up or put up a sign "No guests are allowed to sit here."
L: This woman is really, not a bear is not a bear child's problem, this child is quite sensible, find other places, call her aunt, she also asked the child to have four asses, is it very ugly, diagonally opposite the girl in white There are also three empty seats ah, not to say that everything has to let the child, but this little thing is completely unnecessary to say this kind of thing with a child whose parents are not next to it, this kind of person is actually bullying soft and afraid of hard goods.
M: If an adult sits there and says they refuse to share a table, will the lady insist on sitting there? Moreover, the store has the right to decide the customer's seat and table sharing, there is no table you want to sit, the table is full, you can not sit, you can go to other stores to consume.
N: Indeed, there is a clean two-seater over there, under normal circumstances, normal people will not embarrass a child, and say some things to the child that the child does not understand, the store is too, put the child behind the cash register at mealtime and sit, this comes and goes in case it is hot
O: There are empty seats, why sit at a table with children you don't know, it's normal for children to be afraid! This baby also went to find a place for this aunt, it is already very good, only a two-year-old baby, adults still scare the child "Do you have four asses", why bother with a child yin and yang weirdness.
P: This customer is a bit of a shaft, and it is a little embarrassing for the customer that the child is crying, and I will move over when the back is cleaned up. But this restaurant meal allows children to occupy a seat of 4, I don't understand.
R: I don't know why I have to ask, "Little sister, how many of you are eating together?" Can people sit here?", isn't it very simple? In addition, the basic unit of the restaurant is not a seat but a table, as long as one person sits on the table, it is full of tables, and the situation of full tables requires the consent of the people at the table. Even at a large McDonald's table, sitting next to someone needs to ask if there is anyone here, which is basic politeness.
S: There are so many empty seats next to you that don't sit, you have to share a table with a child, ask people before sharing the table, people agree to share the table, what, you go out to eat and fight for the table where others sit first sit directly without asking, is it polite!
T: If a normal person does not know this child, he will think that the child should be accompanied by his parents, so he is not afraid that he will sit in someone else's seat? There are single seats and empty tables, not against a 2-year-old child yin and yang weirdness, many people in the comment area actually feel that they are doing the right thing...
U: Are the two seats opposite the child considered empty? The child occupies a seat, not eating, just playing. There is no sign stating that customers are not allowed to sit at this table.
V: I gave the money myself, and the setting is not a single table, as long as I don't mess around to see where I sit. At most, ask if there is anyone, how many people themselves do not like the table sharing, even if there is a vacant seat, it is not allowed to sit in the meaning, so outrageous. First come, first come, first come, first come, first come, means that you can sit in this position, I can't sit, not the whole table, four positions can't sit. If you want to have it exclusive, go for the kind of single table or with a private room.
W: If there is a vacant table, why do you have to choose a table that is already occupied? Isn't the table built when there is no empty table? The child must be brought by an adult, the adult may go to order food or buy water for the child, although she only sits in one seat, her mother or her father will definitely come back later, if the family of four, just enough to sit at a table, can let the family come back to sit on her lap?
X: Imagine if you were an adult, sitting in a position on a table, and a stranger sat across from you, what would you say to him? Excuse me, there are people sitting here, and then the other party will leave, don't bully because she is small, children are also people, this position is this child and his mother, this woman is the hegemon, understand? It's not a child's sense of order, so don't get confused.
Y: Actually, this woman sits opposite the little girl, she subconsciously feels that there are so many empty seats, she feels most comfortable sitting in front of this child, so she chooses to share a table with her, it can't be that she hates the little girl to sit opposite her. If there are many people at meal, children will eventually have to give way, not to mention that the food seems to be noodle soup, how dangerous it is to sit in the aisle, and the waiter must pass through the noodle soup.
Z: Can't mom sit next to the child when she comes? Should a person occupy four seats? What are the unspoken rules? I am a college student, and I hate the behavior of occupying seats in the cafeteria and library. Sit down alone, front and back, left and right? I'm not used to it. Moreover, the eldest sister is only sitting on one of the seats opposite, even if the girl's mother and father come, there are still two seats left, can't they sit? The stool is pasted here and can't sit ?? Where to sit?
Regardless of the matter, there is something that can be improved by each party in this matter:
2-year-old children should indeed be well educated, learn to share, and never raise a princess disease from an early age!
Aunts are customers, and customers should be put first, but while enjoying their colleagues, it is okay to move their position and discard some unpleasantness.
The child's mother's online violence is by no means a good way, and the online violence itself is unreasonable!
As for the store, doing business, this bit of heart is still not enough!