Recently, the "Fearless Contract" developed by Riot was officially launched. On the day of the open beta, the game attracted a large number of players into the game and sparked a lot of discussion on social media. However, in the recent player discussion about Valorant, there have been some voices with ulterior motives.
No matter how good a game is, it is impossible for everyone to like it, and it is normal for players to see the shortcomings of the game and complain about it. However, there is a group of "netizens", who seem to be commenting on the problems of the game, but always turn the conversation at the end, "unexpectedly" mentioning an action chicken game that has just turned to free recently.
Not to mention that these mentioned games are far from each other in terms of genre, there is no point in comparing them together, and some people even put ACT, FPS and several games with little relevance in the chicken category together for horizontal comparison. Being so bluntly put together and trampled on, it is difficult not to suspect the deliberate and ulterior motives of the poster.
And the funny thing is that these posting accounts are all low-level. Most of these account levels are only level 1, and they can be regarded as elite when they can go up to level 2, they are already luxurious when they reach level 3, and they can already be called the leader of the water army if they can have level 4. Speaking of this, everyone probably understands everything. It is a pity that this Qing's "water army" is not only a little stretched in terms of business capabilities, but even the account is full of loopholes, so that surfing netizens can easily see the trickiness in it.
In addition to posting the water army, there are even some certified yellow V suspected of collecting money. Not only does it start with an unjustified disparagement of Valorant, but it also uses extremely blunt language to boast about other games. This kind of explicit text expression is also difficult for netizens to think that the author is looking at this matter from an objective perspective, more like holding the "master's task" in the release.
Whether the game can be popular or not, to put it bluntly, depends on whether it can attract players by quality. After all, the player's vision is snowy, which are really good games, players will naturally look at it.