699 can't buy a pair of socks? The income of domestic entertainment stars is exaggerated, netizens: It's time to rectify!
Zhang Yuqi, 699, was scolded.
A few days ago, I searched for these keywords, but I didn't pay attention to it, and I thought that Zhang Yuqi was the same as the worker.
I didn't expect it purely because, 699 yuan.
Bringing goods in the live broadcast room was originally just a conventional "loss and price reduction" process, Zhang Yuqi and the host sang and reconciled:
Original price 1699 wool quilt, welfare price 699.
What the? 699, it's too cheap!
"699 I don't even think I can buy a sock, it's already a good deal."
As a result, this fire sale promotional word, thunder, netizens angry:
"The 208s are really noble."
"My most expensive shoes are only 499 yuan a pair."
"I think leeks are poor, and I have to earn leek money."
Zhang Yuqi apologized, claiming that the original intention was: there are some wool socks that cannot be bought for 699 yuan, so as a high-quality wool quilt, this price is very cost-effective.
You think that's the end of it?
Hehe.
If an apology is useful, then what else should netizens do.
Join the "Have you paid your taxes" and "check it" packages now.
Of course, a little understanding today, even if the condemnation is not fierce enough, it may be characterized as collecting money and laundering.
Sir is not saying that you can't scold celebrities for showing off their wealth.
Instead, I want to remind:
Only now scolded, it seems a little hindsight.
Also take Zhang Yuqi, "699" is already the least showing off her wealth.
As the "spokesperson of broken diamond literature".
A warm tip to make her on the hot search:
Wearing an 8.6-carat pigeon egg wedding ring, Zhang Yuqi advised, "Babies, diamonds below one carat are broken diamonds, they are not valuable, don't buy them." ”
Netizen: Thank you for helping me avoid thunder that I can't afford.
At that time, she was a stupid beauty, reckless rich woman, and the rumors of slapping Wang Xiaofei in the early days, superimposed on the domineering female second image in "Mermaid", made her character very convincing.
The mouth is faster than the brain, dare to love and hate and dare to say, and the popularity of passers-by is also good.
Her dare also lies in: dare to be "ungrounded".
When other female stars are closer to ordinary people, only Zhang Yuqi honestly shows you the gap between stars and civilians.
A six-figure Hermès bag.
Zhang Yuqi told you that it is mainly a practical and versatile one, you can buy vegetables, you can travel... It's even cool just to leave it alone.
Netizens:
Zhang Yuqi: Received.
Then I found LV with a five-figure price.
Five years ago, Zhang Yuqi's "innocence of rich people" not only did not provoke disgust, but was exaggerated, cute, and true temperament.
But five years later.
No matter how much the concept of luxury is, you can't wait for the envious wait-and-see.
What's more.
This became politically incorrect.
"Cutting leeks", "discriminating against ordinary people" and "bad life customs" are no longer a matter of leaking mouths, in short, the matter is very serious!
Why did Zhang Yuqi crazy circle fans when mocking broken diamonds.
Now 699 offends the wrath of the public?
Is it that everyone's consumption is downgraded, and they are suddenly stung by Zhang Yuqi's concept of consumption?
It makes sense, but it's not exactly the same thing.
Zhang Yuqi is still Zhang Yuqi, but the fish tank of the inner fish has been changed I don't know how many rounds of water.
Pay attention to a point in time.
Zhang Yuqi sincerely shared her "expensive goodies" for the first time, in May 2018.
At that time, the internal entertainment was on the eve of the great earthquake.
Although the sky-high salaries have long been heard, and stars have also become the bosses of film and television companies, the public still lacks imagination about the value and income of stars.
In June 2018, Fan Bingbing was reported for a yin-yang contract.
Until the final official data: Fan Bingbing was fined 900 million for tax evasion.
Netizens reacted to this, knowing that celebrities have high incomes, but they didn't know that they could be so high.
After 2018, the tax issue in the entertainment industry has become the target of everyone, and it has also poured a basin of completely cold water on the lively capital game of stars.
At that time, hundreds of film and television companies registered in Khorgos to avoid taxes were quickly cancelled, and it was rumored that many artists paid back taxes.
And then.
It is the most criticized sky-high salary, especially the traffic that is not worthy of the position.
In November 2018, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television issued a "Pay Restriction Order".
The opinions clearly require that the total remuneration of all actors and guests of each film, TV series, and online audiovisual program must not exceed 40% of the total production cost, and the remuneration of the main actors must not exceed 70% of the total remuneration.
The three major video websites and the six major film and television production companies have further reached an agreement on this basis and publicly stated that the remuneration of actors for a single episode (including tax) shall not exceed 1 million yuan, the total remuneration (including tax) shall not exceed 50 million, and the total remuneration of variety shows shall not exceed 10 million yuan.
The most direct income finally has an open and transparent ceiling.
And the capital game that the top ones are keen on also received an "ultimatum" at the same time.
And then again.
It is like a domino effect, one after another:
Shuangzi got the code name "208w", Wu Yifan was arrested for rape, and "Huan Zhu Gege" was not seen after Xiaoyanzi broke into trouble...
There is also the "queen of fashion" that Sir wrote specifically, Su Mang.
She single-handedly founded Harper's Bazaar Charity Night, contributed countless female celebrities to compete for famous scenes, and effectively replaced the resources of the fashion and entertainment circles.
In 2022, the same spit that came out of a blurt overturned.
"650 yuan, not enough food for a day."
How, is it the same sentence as "699 wool socks"?
The high income of the star, everyone is not known today.
It's just that it used to be acceptable, but now it can't.
In the past, the entertainment industry could also embrace the most extreme prosperity and render the most inflated desires.
In fact, the people who criticize Zhang Yuqi today for "wearing seven hundred socks" are likely to be the same people who touted that "broken diamonds are not worth buying", all of which are unconscious attacks of the collective atmosphere.
At that time, people reveled in the thrving of consumerism.
Now it is increasingly finding that this road does not work.
And every road to social topics can lead to the entertainment industry.
In addition to showing off wealth, there is also the rectification of all kinds of negative news.
For example, academic questions, Zhai Tianlin was cut up because of the sentence "what is the knowledge network" in the live broadcast.
Behind this is the anxiety of involution of academic qualifications and competition for graduate school entrance examinations: why can ordinary people take off a layer of skin to survive a degree, which can be snatched away by stars just to decorate themselves.
For example, admission fraud.
Tong Zhuo revealed in the live broadcast that he "used a little means" during the college entrance examination and hammered himself with his own hands.
The college entrance examination, the last bottom line of social fairness in the hearts of Chinese people, how can it be trampled on so much?
Even if it's not the celebrity himself's problem.
If something happens to a family member, they will also be implicated.
For example, dance training causes students to become disabled and arrears of medical expenses; For example, because of the problem of unfinished buildings, he has become an old lai.
Netizens said: Disaster does not affect children, provided that it does not benefit children.
Of course.
Unfair opportunities, breaking rules, and infringing on the rights of others need no justification.
But at the same time.
Are these chaos unique to the entertainment industry?
The society around us is actually more widely distributed.
But how much can we expose, and how many channels can we appeal and defend our rights?
If we talk about the news in the past, the entertainment version is the entertainment version, the social version is the social version, and the financial version is the financial version.
Now, one entertainment industry alone bears it all.
As a result, it is difficult for stars to be understood and forgiven as before.
Because this is the only outlet for anger, and the only giant that the public has the ability to bring down.
If you say that in the past, everyone used to use a kaleidoscope to see stars.
Then now it is with a magnifying glass, with a microscope.
Breaking the law, drug addiction, prostitution, tax evasion and evasion are naturally not a problem.
But when the worst celebrities disappear, where should the eyes of the trial go?
When the illegal ones are done, they look for the immoral ones.
When the immoral ones are also searched, they will look for the unruly ones.
The result can only be.
Negative news is becoming lighter and more "involuted".
Wang Yuan smoked on the hot search.
Netizens scolded, and the parties apologized.
Even picking feet on the street has been on the hot search.
The parties also came out to express their position and made a bad demonstration themselves.
Sir also wants to state that there is no intention to promote smoking and picking feet.
It's just that when does this kind of minutiae also need to be on the news, and it also needs stars to tremble and apologize?
If it had been put more than ten years ago, wouldn't the Chinese-speaking stars have to die collectively.
Zhou Xun drank.
Dou Wei burned the car.
Nicholas Tse grabbed the paparazzi camera.
Without him.
It's just that entertainment gossip has cast a "desperate net", and after the big fish are caught, they can only catch shrimp and fish fry.
So Neiyu clarified.
Clear out of fish.
On the one hand, everyone can't tolerate a little impurity of the star, and on the other hand, they sigh that there are no living people in the entertainment industry.
While celebrities are looking for affiliation and endorsement in such an atmosphere, on the other hand, because they are too hasty, they have angered the nerves of the public.
Are stars pathetic?
Of course not.
No matter how it is, it is not to the extent that we need empathy.
It's just that the entertainment industry we see: and the social mentality behind it: has changed.
And in the end, everything echoes and echoes.
Imagine when Luo Zhixiang was beaten.
Zhang Yuqi incarnated as the goddess of justice, raised the scissors of judgment, and cut off the octopus tentacles.
Combined with the films the two have worked with, the subtext speaks for itself
This extremely relieved operation made Zhang Yuqi rise in popularity again, and increased the character of the boss by another 10 centimeters.
The main thing is a personality flamboyant.
But how long can you show your personality?
The changes in Zhang Yuqi's popularity in the past two years may be a clear weather vane in the entertainment industry.
During the violent injury incident at the Tangshan barbecue restaurant last year, Zhang Yuqi spoke out for the passion of the women who were attacked, but was caught by netizens because she accidentally brought the word "wolf warrior" in her expression.
Then someone kept buttoning her hat and going online, demanding boycotts, withdrawal from the circle, and banning.
And then what?
It's the hot search for "699 wool socks" now.
In fact, Zhang Yuqi has converged much more than before, and he is also too stable.
Without the "broken diamond literature" of the past and the high profile of Hermes.
also did not personally eat melons in the collapse of the entertainment industry, or speak out on social events.
Even in live streaming.
After saying "can't buy a pair of socks", in fact, she was also looking for repairs in time.
From Luo Zhixiang, to wool socks.
Sir is not to wrestle with the question of who is right and who is wrong, and whether it is worth forgiving.
Putting aside the gossip and the anger of netizens, what we can see is a clear trajectory:
The ruler that measures the star, the scale is getting finer and finer.
From emotional disputes and chaos in private life, he was kicked out of the circle.
Even an unintentional mistake will set yourself on fire.
Zhang Yuqi was watching the scenery on the bridge back then, and today others are watching her under the bridge.
Because those who have fallen ill can be judged.
But will it be safe to judge ta?
No.
When the player who violates the action is out.
The rest on the stage, the action is a little bigger, and it immediately alarms the four parties.
Then, it may be wrong to blink and breathe.
Today's internal entertainment:
A large-scale "one, two, three, wooden man" game.
In the past, it was a race to get out of positions and dominate the page, but today it is better than who has good determination and who can hold their breath more.
In the past, Zhang Yuqi featured a star who dared to stand out and was straightforward, but it is foreseeable that the stars who take this route will only become fewer and fewer in the future.
Do 699 socks need an apology?
Maybe it's not important anymore.
Anyway, what we can be sure of is that the game is not over.
It remains to be seen where the future goes.
The picture of this article comes from the Internet
Editorial Assistant: The hostess doesn't have a holiday