Yang Liping's peacock dancer appearance is accused of indecent, and there are always "old antiques" who do not buy tickets and criticize art

First, the incident review: Yang Liping's latest dance drama male dancer style "seems to be naked" and is accused of "pornography"

On June 15, the topic "Yang Liping's peacock dance dancer style was accused of indecent" quickly rose to the top of the hot search list. Some netizens posted a set of stage photos, which are Yang Liping's latest choreographed dance drama "Peacock", and there is a dance of male dancers' costume styling "very large-scale". The male dancer in the photo is wearing only a pair of flesh-colored leggings, and when lying on her side in the arms of the female dancer, the stage light is on, and she looks like she is naked.

After these photos were issued, it caused controversy among netizens, some netizens thought that they could not appreciate it, could not understand, even if it was art, they could not be too naked, and said that this was doing some obscene things under the pretext of art, and it would have a bad impact on teenagers, and another part of netizens felt that such a shape interpreted the plot well, felt the power and beauty of dance, those who criticize do not know how to appreciate art, their thinking is too conservative, and they don't comment indiscriminately if they don't understand art.

Since then, Yang Liping also responded to the controversy, she introduced that the peacock played by the actor first grew immature feathers, gradually enriched its wings, then fell in love with the female peacock, and finally gave the feathers of the whole body in exchange for the freedom of the female peacock. The actor's appearance at that time was in line with the plot. She advises the audience to watch the dance drama from the beginning.

Second, it is not advisable to take words out of context: the poignant plot is distorted into indecent and indecent

So through Yang Liping's response, we can learn that this was originally a poignant love story, the male peacock and the female peacock fell in love, and in order to free the female peacock, he sacrificed the beautiful feathers of the whole body. In the online photo, the male dancer wearing only flesh-colored leggings is playing a male peacock who has lost his full body feathers. And this shape is also in line with the plot.

So in the comments something like "If you don't understand, just ask, don't peacocks have feathers?" Did it all fall out? Do you have to dress like this to perform this dance? Such remarks are typical out of context, without even understanding the cause and effect, and wantonly criticizing, if the thinking on this matter is only at this level, it really has not even touched the threshold of critical art. It is easy to draw conclusions from a photo or clip sent by others, and if the judgment and understanding of things do not pursue comprehensive and multi-angle, it is really easy to be led to the rhythm.

Third, there is a threshold for art appreciation: dance drama uses tickets to separate "old antiques" who do not understand art

In addition to this, some people put forward a further view, "No matter what the plot is, the performance is almost naked, and it is not good for the public to see it, don't get involved in art." ”

What's more, he buttoned a big hat with a bad minor, "Such a large-scale shape will have a bad impact on the underage audience." ”

But in fact, these views are also full of holes, because this performance is performed in a theater, and if you want to see the so-called "almost naked" performance, you need to buy a ticket. On the one hand, tickets are to earn labor income for performers, on the other hand, it is also a threshold, most of the people who will buy tickets to pay for watching, are people who recognize this art form, can not spend money to "spicy their own eyes", of course, does not exclude some people to "see fresh" curiosity or some vulgar ideas to buy tickets to enter the venue, but these discussions and evaluations are also limited to buyers.

Therefore, the existence of tickets is originally to screen the audience, and to exclude those "old antiques" who do not know how to appreciate art by paying for it, this payment threshold is also a threshold for art appreciation from a certain point of view. After all, some artistic expressions are not popular, so they don't want to be pointed at by people who don't understand.

So why did the "old antiques", which should have been largely isolated, end up participating in the discussion? Because some netizens circulated photos of the dance drama scene, but this was not allowed.

Fourth, piracy should not be: piracy and uploading to the Internet cause controversy, not stupid is bad

Taking photos on the stage of the theater is not compliant, not only for fear of circulating pirated films, resulting in revenue being affected, but also because stage photos from different perspectives are likely to bias public opinion because of lighting problems, as this incident caused controversy.

Therefore, people who upload photos to the Internet after secretly taking photos are either stupid or bad, knowing that they should not steal and secretly take photos, or upload them to the Internet for perhaps "desire to share", or perhaps to cause controversy in public opinion. If it is purely for sharing, it is stupid to not expect such controversy, and if it is to cause controversy, it is bad.

People who do not abide by the rules do things in violation of the rules, but the storm caused by the performance must be borne by the compliance, and the violators are beautiful and invisible, which is inevitably a bit absurd.

5. Elegance or vulgarity: There are always people who "think of white arms when they see short sleeves, and immediately think of total nudity"

The dancers played animals with their bodies, they did not get naked, and they did not engage in obscene things. Dancers spend their lives trying to train their bodies and make their bodies beautiful, but they always get a lot of dirty speculation. Some people remember the plot and the dancers' movements in this performance, while others can only see bare skin and flesh.

From the perspective of communication, both the communicator and the recipient need to have a "common meaning space", and if there is no "common meaning space" between the two parties, the effect of this communication will be unsuccessful, because what the communicator wants to express, the recipient cannot understand. In the same way, art has a threshold, and appreciation has a premise.

There are a thousand Hamlets in a thousand people, and some people ask everyone to appreciate what they should or not appreciate, everyone has the right to appreciate freely, and the so-called "magnetic field" will connect the matching "people and things", "people and people" and "people and things".

So if you can't appreciate it, then let go of the other person and let yourself go.

6. Private life is controversial: there is no need to peep and point to the privacy of others

In fact, about Yang Liping, her private life has also been prying and concerned by many people, and even pointed out.

Yang Liping has no children in her life, and someone left a message in Yang Liping's comment area: "A woman's biggest failure is that she has no children, the so-called living out of herself is blindfolded, even if she is beautiful and excellent, she can't escape the ravages of the years." "If the person who commented on Yang Liping's indecent and indecent dance is the person who said such a thing, then it is indeed understandable. After all, I can't understand the thoughts of these people. Whether a person's success depends on whether there are descendants, which is really a very limited idea in this era.

In addition, in order to pursue beauty, Yang Liping also insists on growing long nails, resulting in many inconveniences such as washing and dressing, specifically finding a life assistant, and also issuing a monthly salary of 2W, and netizens found that every time Yang Liping appeared, she was followed by a male assistant, so there were rumors that her private life was chaotic. Just the gender of the assistant is male, and the brain can make up for the chaos in private life, and this behavior of creating "yellow ballads" for women is obviously with heavy colored glasses.

It was revealed that he was in love with a male makeup artist who was more than 30 years younger, which caused controversy, and it was even more confusing to evaluate. Even if this is true, the fact that a man is unmarried and a woman is not married, and two people with independent and mature ideas fall in love, they have to be singled out for some so-called "different from the world" criticism, which is really a kind of ideological degradation.

There is also Yang Liping's controversial "Sun Palace", admittedly, in the past, due to sewage discharge and other problems, the Sun Palace was pushed to the cusp, but Yang Liping also made clear her attitude, in order to support the protection of Erhai by the government of Dali Prefecture, the Sun Palace was transformed into an art space for the public to visit for free. And posted on Weibo: I, Yang Liping, have been Bai for generations, Erhai is my hometown, how can I not protect "her"!

So in fact, there is no violation of the law and discipline in her private life, nor does she harm others, and Yang Liping, as an excellent dancer, she does not rely on marketing her private life to win traffic heat, so as to make a profit, then on this basis, the public does not need to grasp people's private life, peep and point.