Fumin County People's Court
Judge Huang Fengfei found:
On July 15, 2022, the defendant Xu Yiming purchased a TV cabinet from the plaintiff Feilin Tianshu Company, and the plaintiff sent the stamped "Product Sales Contract" to the defendant Xu Yiming, and Xu Yiming added "Formaldehyde emission with reference GJ202002701 is not more than 0.02mg/m³" to the ID card number." and signed. The plaintiff was paid $2,000 on the same day and $1,880 on August 8. After the installation on August 10, the two parties disputed whether the board of the TV cabinet was E0 or F4 star and the formaldehyde emission did not meet the contracted standard of 0.02 mg/m³ or less.
Xu Yiming believes:
The controversy arose, how did Judge Huang Fengfei determine it? The contract is invalid! Invalid chat history!
Feilin E0 grade 18 board, 126 yuan / piece. Feilin F4 star 18 board, 128 yuan / piece!
F4 Star: The environmental protection level is at the top level in the world!
Are Yunnan people too poor? Or is the plaintiff too evil?
Chat history conventions:
"Formaldehyde emission is not greater than 0.02mg/m³ according to GJ202002701."
Chat history conventions:
"Formaldehyde emission is not greater than 0.02mg/m³ according to GJ202002701."
Once again, the agreement!
The plaintiff promised during the chat:
Attach a quality inspection report as an attachment to the contract!
The quality inspection report is this GJ202002701, aldehyde-free substrate veneer sent for inspection A release report
The contract is there, and the quality inspection report GJ202002701 is attached to the contract
The contract is signed and both parties agree. I copy-pasted the convention of the chat history under the signature
"Formaldehyde emission is not greater than 0.02mg/m³ according to GJ202002701."
Judge Huang Fengfei:
The ways in which the adjudicator manipulates the case are embodied in the artificial manipulation of the facts of the case (contrary to the truth of the case), the manipulation of evidence, the intentional distortion of the facts (distortion of evidence), the abuse of power to manipulate the procedure (violation of legal procedures), the pretense of deliberately misapplying the law (distortion and abuse of the law), and the indiscriminate writing of judgments (full of contradictions and errors).
In this way, judges must deviate from the fundamental requirements of the people's courts, and are 100% opposed to the requirements of fairness and justice, punishing evil and promoting good. Any judgment that cracks down on goodness and integrity, and protects underworld and fraud is not legal.