To tell you the truth, Zhang Jike, this kid, plays the ball well, and his appearance is also very online. After Kong Linghui, there is no one in the Chinese table tennis industry. But there is one problem with Kong seniors - good gambling.
Is Zhang Jike a victim?
Now there is a voice on the Internet to wash the floor for him: Zhang Jike's creditor, Mr. S, who has been imprisoned, is a full-time loan shark in the casino, setting a set for our Olympic champions. In this way, Zhang Jike became a victim instead.
How do you say this? A guy who can casually lend 500w to others in a casino is indeed not a serious person. He deserved to go to prison, and I had no intention of doing justice for him. Individual reporters took evidence from S, and then never mentioned the identity of this guy, suspected of selective reporting.
But this guy is bad, does not mean that Zhang Jike is not bad. Flies don't bite seamless eggs, why doesn't S come to me? Is it because I didn't sew? Not really, it's more likely that I have no money and am not an egg in S's eyes.
It's like the case where Li Tianyi was sentenced to ten years in prison. I never felt how noble or detached the female victim was from low tastes. But Li Tianyi has obtained so many resources (Zhongguancun Three Primary School, Renmin University Affiliated High School, American High School, Tsinghua Professor teaches calligraphy, Professor Yangyin teaches piano, and Olympic bid image ambassador), but he has not made more contributions to society - of course, if you have to say that the success of the Olympic bid is due to this 4-year-old child, I can't refute you. He used his resources to do bad things that ordinary people could not do. And it is taught again and again. That's it, the penalty! Not wronged at all.
Spider-Man says: With great power comes great responsibility. Since you have more money, you should take on more social responsibility. You can't let the public demand you from the moral standards of a homeless person. Because the homeless man can at most snatch a loaf of bread from the bakery to feed himself, but you have the ability to rob a lot of ordinary people of their livelihood - if your moral standards are not high enough, this is terrible.
My impression of Jing Tian
For Jing Tian himself, I am completely insensitive. I didn't like it or hate it – because none of her works left the slightest impression on me. Flat-chested, this girl is quite beautiful. But I am completely unfamiliar with this face. The name is more like a bottle of mineral water to me.
What is wrong with Zhang Jike?
Throughout the whole incident, Zhang did two things wrong. 1. Don't gamble. 2. Jing Tian's private videos should not be shown to others, or even used as collateral for borrowing money.
This behavior is very bottomless. There is no bottom line, and I am embarrassed to scold. The size of Jing Tian is also a corner, what do you think of people? This is a hundred times more disgusting than Edison Chen back then.
Who is hurting Jing Tian?
But this raises a question, is it a secondary harm to Jing Tian that we scold Zhang Jike now?
Why did I think about this question? Because I mentioned a big V sleeping powder a few days ago, and the woman committed suicide afterwards (the original article is here). As a result, many people scolded me, saying that I did not respect the deceased and caused secondary harm to the husband and daughter of the deceased.
I'm strange, isn't it Zhang Jike who hurts Jing Tian? Count S at most. When will it be the turn of the murderer to eat melons?
According to this set of theories, Zheng Chengyue overturned Nie Shubin's case, can it be regarded as disturbing the peaceful life that Nie Shubin's family has finally recovered? If Zheng Chengyue fails, the case is not turned over in the end, and his family does not receive state compensation, will Zheng become a sinner?
There is also the ruthless Zhang Bo in Chongqing who threw a pair of biological children from the 15th floor and fell to death in order to be with his rich second-generation lover. Now is he qualified to say: In order not to hurt the feelings of the mother of the two dead children, you are not allowed to scold me anymore!
In short, using the protection of the victim's family as a reason to shut up all ordinary people who care about the victim and are full of anger, this behavior is as disgusting as Zhang Jike's private video to settle debts. The best way to protect the victim's family should be to not let the victim get hurt, rather than deliberately turning a blind eye to the victim's injury.
I would like to ask those who hold this view, do you think that commemorating the Nanjing Massacre today is disrespectful to the dead? Is it a secondary injury to the descendants of the deceased? I don't think anyway.
In this age of the internet, another versatile excuse is that you're here for traffic. This excuse can be used to attack all those who speak out of a sense of justice and anger.