The son enters the temple and asks everything. Or, "Who is the son of the man who knows the etiquette?"

<h2 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" > text: Zi into the Taimiao Temple, everything is asked. Or, "Who is the son of the man who knows the etiquette?" Enter the Temple, ask everything. The son smelled it and said, "It is Reiya." ”</h2>

Basic definition:

1. Taimiao: The founding monarch is called Taizu, and the temple of Taizu is called Taimiao. This refers to the temple of the Duke of Zhou, the first monarch of the State of Lu to be crowned.

2. Zōu (鄹) (zōu): The name of the lu state, southeast of present-day Qufu City, Shandong Province. Confucius's father was a doctor, so it is called a man here.

* Confucius entered the Taimiao Temple and asked carefully about everything he encountered. Someone said, "Who says that the son of Dr. Yiyi knows etiquette?" When he entered the temple, he asked Confucius to hear this and said, "This is exactly the ritual." ”

Soup flavor:

Regarding this sentence, the interpretation of famous quotes is different, let's first bypass today's content and first talk about a real problem.

We tend to make the mistake of supporting a certain point of view, that is, I agree with who I like, and I think he is right. This is a kind of inertial thinking, but this is a one-sided mentality. Officially, there is a lack of academic spirit. To be honest, there is a lack of a serious spirit of curiosity.

The so-called "questioning" is difficult to judge the praise and criticism, at least from the tone of the word, it does feel that it is not very friendly, but the precise meaning of the word is "a public expression of doubt that is doubtful and put forward in order to get an answer to doubt". In this way, it is still neutral.

With regard to the spirit of scholarship, we must first determine the objective conditions, that is, we are judging whether a sentence is right or wrong on the premise of this sentence, not who said it. This is the premise.

Secondly, anyone has individualistic emotional colors, and celebrities are the same, and their emotional colors are stronger than ordinary people. So true objectivity, when we verify the view of whether a sentence is right or wrong, we also need to observe this person and study this person.

Again, the environment and the background. The social environment, the geographical environment, what kind of era background and environment this sentence is said in, is very important.

To take a simple example, Li Ao, a famous celebrity in Taiwan, is known for daring to say anything, a direct, sharp representative. In fact, many people like to hear what such a person says, because he is different, with a strong individualist color and critical spirit, which is easy to stimulate contradictions and thus produce controversial resonance.

I personally have never resented Li Ao, and I still like him, but recently something happened, that is, another Famous Taiwanese mouth, Huang Shicong, who ridiculed mainlanders on a TV show some time ago that they can't afford to squeeze vegetables. Many mainlanders cried and laughed and thought he was ignorant. Chinese mainland Fuling squeezed vegetables is very clever, and also sent him two boxes of squeezed vegetables, which was marketed by Meimei.

But what really made me think about it was a sentence he said afterwards: "Taiwanese TV shows are not easy to do, many topic controversies are preset, and no one pays attention without gimmicks." "Therefore, creating a topic is a matter of last resort for the media, but some people really take it seriously, laugh at it, sensationalize it, and some things, you lose if you are more real." More true is never serious, serious and more true, what is polite, what is wrong?!

So it's a terrible thing to have no academic spirit, and that's how the Internet trolls are built. Whether Li Ao's remarks are also influenced by such a background is worth pondering, after all, it is determined by the general environment in Taiwan. The more extreme the topic, the more opinions, arguments, the more it needs to be thought about in an academic spirit. This is a manifestation of rationality.

Returning to today's Analects, in fact, it expresses an emotion, that is, "Do you know and ask?" In today's parlance, Confucius knowingly asked, pretending to be forced. Whether that is true or not, we need to get to the bottom of it:

First, let's understand the meaning of pretense:

1. Always use esoteric language and exaggerated and gorgeous behavior to package yourself to achieve the effect of standing out from the crowd and attracting attention. (Excerpt from The Red Robe Mage)

2) Smart people often feel that they are dumber than others.

The reason why the word B has two completely opposite meanings is that the second term is derived from the principle that "excessive modesty equals pride". Therefore, the second meaning of this word is often more ridiculous and complaining about the meaning of saying that others "pretend to B".

Then we look at whether There is such a problem in Confucius's words and deeds, and from the first criterion, Confucius in this passage does not use profound words or behaviors to guide others in etiquette, but only uses the mentality of verification to understand the situation, obviously, this is not in line.

Looking at the second criterion, if we use excessive modesty equals pride, it seems to be on the side, but what we need to think about is excessive modesty? What is this standard? Now to explain, excessive modesty comes from the Bible, and excessive modesty is defined as the establishment of one's own prestige in order to earn the praise of others.

So what is modesty?

The definition of modesty: modesty, refers to humility, not exaggerating one's own abilities or values; no exaggeration or conceit. It also refers to the habit of being able to take the initiative to ask others for advice or advice before a person has made a decision or taken action with confidence.

In terms of Confucius's actions, this is a manifestation of modesty. It's not overly modest. Nature is not called knowingly asking. Because it is an active question, and there is no exaggeration, deliberately demeaning any meaning of the presentation, it is obvious that this is a misinterpretation of humility by the questioner himself. This just shows that there is a problem with the mentality of the person who thinks confucius knowingly asked, what is the problem, the eyes are red and jealous. Belittling Confucius in exchange for the recognition of him.

Speaking of modesty, it is a very difficult word to grasp, just like Confucius in this matter, there is a problem, some people think that he pretends to be forced, so we should most figure out today how to be modest.

Mao Sui self-recommendation, this is an idiom, self-recommendation such a word comes out, it is estimated that too many people will say, how this person is like this, too immodest, I believe many people will think so, which just shows that everyone has a misinterpretation of modesty. The essence of modesty is the expression of objectivity and seeking truth from facts, rather than deliberately degrading oneself, it is called modesty, if Mao Sui is humble enough to belittle oneself and feel inferior, will there never be a day when it will emerge.

So humility is not about burying yourself. To give a realistic example, if a train encounters a patient and needs first aid, and there are two doctors on the train, who are humble to each other, are admiring each other, all kinds of concessions, all kinds of self-humility, and finally wait for the patient's result, so the key time not to stand up, is not a manifestation of modesty.

The antonym of modesty is pride, not modesty that is not pride, the answer is no, in other words, modesty should also have the environment to decide, before reading a story, an old teacher, is a member of the Chinese Calligraphy Association, write a good hand, but there is a habit, words must be called beginners, books must be called inferior books. But when everyone didn't know how despicable his writing was, a wave of ink and a good hand were presented in front of everyone, and in everyone's exclamation, he was still humble to death. Say "no good" and "see the laughter and laugh"! What he said about bad and smiling was the humility he expressed, but for some layman students, what is this modesty?

The modesty here is a bit hypocritical, it is false modesty, and it is better to make people feel more comfortable than pride!

So modesty needs to have a degree, Confucius once said that it is too late, since Confucius knows such a concept, why should it be shown off, obviously there is no need, so Confucius's answer "is etiquette" is the perfect answer, he may want to modestly verify his understanding of Zhou Li, with a modest attitude to care about the details, what is wrong?

If the story is extended, if Confucius asked questions and found that his understanding of Zhou Li was different from others, should he ignore it and stand idly by?

Therefore, there is nothing wrong with the spirit of verifying the ritual, it is precisely a manifestation of responsibility, not to mention that Confucius entered the Taimiao Temple.

To end today's topic with an interesting phenomenon, we all have a habit of closing the door and going downstairs, and a question suddenly flashes in our minds, is the door closed? Now called obsessive-compulsive disorder, under normal circumstances, you will go up to check or not to check, with today's topic how do we interpret these two "I"?