In the past, they narrowly believed that "beauty" was only the business of artists, and only they cared about this useless thing, but now they have stayed in their rural hometown for a long time, and gradually feel that "beauty" is the inner need of everyone

In the past, they narrowly believed that "beauty" was only the business of artists, and only they cared about this useless thing, but now they have stayed in their rural hometown for a long time, and gradually feel that "beauty" is the inner need of everyone.

For example, farmers all require "like" to do farm work, what is the use of you telling him to ask for that "sample"? Nor does it affect the actual effect, they will reply that it is uncomfortable to look at it, or that it makes others laugh. So they are willing to spend more time on work that is beyond the actual role and make their hearts comfortable, isn't this for the sake of "beauty"? I used to do farm work without paying attention to this, and now I seem to have a mental need for this "kind", and only then did I begin to understand the villagers and their "beautiful" needs.

There is still a gap between the understanding of "beauty" between the public and good artists, and the reason why artists are useful is that they should play a leading role, just as the philosopher's ideas play a guiding role. In fact, they may not play a universal leading role, but they must represent the height of human beings.

​