Text/Dingfengboli
Zhang Wenhong being deified is not a good thing, it may make people underestimate the power of the virus; Jack Ma is regarded as a tragic hero, which is nothing more than someone deliberately provoking right and wrong and amplifying pessimism; Wu Jing's malicious choreography reflects a strong sense of sublime thinking
When I accidentally saw many netizens retweeting "Dr. Zhang Wenhong was elected a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference in the whirlpool of public opinion, this is the attitude of the people towards him", I always felt unhappy and had a strong desire to express.
First, do not myth Zhang Wenhong's contribution and influence during the anti-epidemic period
Frankly speaking, I am not a medical or related major, and I am not good at the economic field. Even Zhang Wenhong's medical research and treatment ability cannot be judged, nor has he read his papers, let alone studied his series of speeches in depth.
I believe that there are not many netizens like this. Whether it's an opponent, a supporter, or a neutral.
Everyone has different views on Zhang Wenhong on the Internet, and even has to argue endlessly. But let's be honest, we know very little about Zhang Wenhong, and we don't have enough ability and energy to judge his impact and contribution during the pandemic.
In the final analysis, most people are just because they have seen several of his Weibo or interviews, and even many people want to deliberately excerpt a few of them, so as to make a comprehensive determination or completely deny.
Is this really desirable?!
In my opinion, there are three major opinion leaders in the field of public opinion. They were Sima Nan, Zhang Wenhong and Hu Xijin.
Zhang Wenhong can essentially be said to be the "Sima Nan" in the medical field. This means: he is famous, has many supporters, and has many opponents, but people do not seem to recognize his professionalism so much.
Sima Nan was very keen to criticize Zhang Wenhong. But in fact, the two also have something in common, that is, they are very good at popularizing science or publicizing in a language that ordinary people can understand.
Therefore, there is no need to myth Zhang Wenhong!
In my mind, Zhang Wenhong is not Zhong Nanshan. Supporting Zhang Wenhong does not mean supporting all of his views, but more supporting his general direction that human beings will eventually coexist with the virus, and supporting his call to pay attention to the livelihood of the people at the bottom during the strict control period.
In addition, it is necessary to emphasize again: CPPCC members are not deputies to the National People's Congress, nor are they strictly elected by the people. You can say that Zhang Wenhong's original membership of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) reflected the recognition of his work by the state and society, and the recognition of him by a considerable number of people. But to imply that everyone supports him is undoubtedly contrary to the truth and to myth him!
A simple truth: just when Zhang Wenhong was elected a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, Jin Dong Donnie Yen was elected a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.
Jack Ma is a business leader and ahead of the times, but we also need more new people
Although there is little personal research in the field of economics. But asking yourself is still relatively observant.
As far as personal long-term observation and feelings are concerned, there are such signs in our society: it is common for us to like or be keen to pull the banner, and then simplify complex problems, to understand the deep-seated contradictions in society very shallowly, to attack each other, label and button hats.
In the past few years, whenever business tycoons Jack Ma, Liu Chuanzhi, and Liu Qiangdong have a hint of turmoil, they have to make suggestive and even negative interpretations. What is not as good as the past, the general environment is not good.
However, Musk has lost 1.4 trillion yuan, Bill Gates has long lost the throne of the world's richest man, these people may never say that the US economy is not good!
Talking about this, take the opportunity to say a few points:
1. Sima Nan was absolutely right to question Liu Chuanzhi. Because in the final analysis, economic development is inseparable from a healthy business environment, social productive forces that can be fully released and the healthy development of society as a whole.
Take our neighbors, for example, in the days when the Russian oligarchy prevailed, there were still a lot of people who supported this economy, but did it rise? Economic shock therapy in the former Soviet Union has been praised by countless people, but is it really effective?
After all, creating more wealth for this society is the majority of ordinary people.
In the final analysis, anti-monopoly and the investigation of economic misconduct will harm the interests of some people, but it will be beneficial to the overall socio-economic development.
This is the difference between short-sightedness and long-term development, and it is also the difference between selfishness and childishness.
2. A generation of new people for old people. Instead of always focusing on Jack Ma and others, it is better to pay close attention to the majority of entrepreneurs and the majority of small and medium-sized enterprises.
3. Jack Ma and Alibaba are complex, and using simple thinking to make simple judgments is undoubtedly pretending to be stupid. Alibaba decisively seizes the opportunity in the new era and ushers in great development, but it will develop weakly due to market saturation, which is obviously an objective law. People who overinterpret it will inevitably make people feel that this is an ulterior motive! Alibaba needs to do something to find new opportunities.
4, Ma Yun once said that he is committed to cultivating more Liu Qiangdong. Now, after all these years, has he achieved this?
Overall, Jack Ma is a business leader and ahead of the times, but we also need more new people. The Internet has been a period of rapid development in the past decade, but now that it has entered a mature period, we need to look for the blue ocean, not the yin and yang strange, complaining "tears have blurred the eyes"!
Pessimists never have the mentality of coming out on top, let alone a positive and optimistic attitude. They often can't withstand setbacks, and their favorite thing to do is to think of things for the worse.
Ma has said that he has succeeded because he is more optimistic and confident about the future than most of his peers.
This sentence, to the majority of financial bloggers!
Third, who is maliciously arranging the wolf Wu Jing?
Since the wolf warrior fire came out of the circle, Wu Jing resounded at home and abroad, but also ushered in a bad atmosphere.
There are always people who are yin and yang strange, even maliciously choreographed. What to set up patriotic people, eat patriotic traffic ...
What wolf warrior PSTD, enduring ...
People can't help but think deeply: who is questioning Wu Jing, and who is so uncomfortable with Wu Jing?
Do wolves and wandering earth really make them so unacceptable?
Some overseas netizens are obviously maliciously arranging Wu Jing, which is essentially just the growing dissatisfaction of our influence, and the enslavement of the Western-dominated world order deep into the marrow!
These people are not worth mentioning. However, what is really sad is that many netizens in our country recognize such views. In the end, these people dare not compete, are afraid of competition, and most of them even suffer from auterobia!
They do not see that the wolf warrior is more showing the evacuation of overseas Chinese, and it is to give overseas Chinese confidence and a sense of security. However, despite this, they are physically honest, and when they really encounter problems, they will still go to the embassy as in the movie "Wolf Warrior".
Their mentality is very simple. That is the antipathy to China's rise, or more clearly the antipathy that China will one day surpass the United States. Twitter celebrity Xu Siyuan vividly expressed this mentality: only Americans save the world is justified, and Chinese to show great love for the world is to put money on themselves.
Some netizens commented on this: The same group of people, Yan Ning and others went to the United States to exaggerate, and returning to China is a big derogatory and derogatory; With the same movie theme, Americans are righteous to shoot, and Chinese shooting is righteousness. People can't help but wonder, is this the double standard hypocrisy, or has the thinking been unknowingly colonized?