This article begins by expressing my personal opinion, which is the famous quote in Mencius's article "Born in Trouble, Died in Happiness" in the recent week, that is, the debate over whether the heavenly task was "from Yusi" or "so man" is coming to an end.
The reason why I say this is because at the beginning of this debate, the most important missing "elements" were found under the efforts of the majority of netizens, and they found not just one place, but many.
Specifically, that is, it is true that in the teaching materials published by education publishing houses in many different places, some use the version of "Yusi people", the majority of netizens are not mistaken, the situation is such a situation, the thing is such a thing.
However, from the beginning of this matter, it was not a controversy that simply discussed the matter, but was mixed with the ulterior motives of some netizens, the most important of which is that after many netizens who insisted on "so people" took out the network map, some people took care to do the so-called psychological analysis of this matter.
After analysis, the conclusion is that these netizens who insist on "Yusi people" probably suffer from collective hysteria, or collective subconscious, which is a manifestation of the so-called "Mandela effect".
To tell you the truth, when this kind of remarks are so loud on the Internet, I am personally anxious. Why do you say that? Because in my memory, we learned "Yusi people", there is no such thing as "so people", and there is no so-called memory error, concept confusion, and so on. So, I firmly believe that my memory is not wrong.
In addition, the reason why I firmly believe that my memory is not wrong is related to a personal experience. I remember once when the school held a calligraphy competition, I wrote this article "Born in Trouble, Died in Happiness", but at that time I wrote this "Si" as a "tear" to tear things, which made teachers and classmates laugh for a long time, and I was self-satisfied for a long time.
Why is there such a big mistake? That is, I personally couldn't tell what was the difference between this "Si" and this "tear" at that time, so I was extremely impressed by this matter, and to some extent, it also left a juvenile shadow in my heart, so when the dispute between "Yusi people" and "so people" began, I thought that what we learned was "Yusi people", but I really couldn't come up with evidence, because thirty or forty years have passed since this incident, including people who insist on this view like me on the Internet, about forty or fifty years old, So it's normal to say that there is no evidence.
Looking at it now, this matter is about this: the version of people's education has always been the version of "so people", but many local education publishing houses have adopted the version of "Yusi people", but in the past 20 years or so, the version of local education publishing houses and the version of people's education have been on par, and the use of "so people" has caused such a big difference. Of course, this disagreement is normal and there is nothing surprising.
What is infuriating and unacceptable is that those netizens who insist on "so people" criticize those of us who insist on "Yusi people", and even some so-called experts are careful to analyze, saying that this is the so-called Mandela effect, and their statements and practices are really ridiculous and generous.
So, why do these netizens who insist on "so people" so ridicule and ridicule netizens who insist on "Yusi people"? My personal analysis probably stems from the following reasons:
The first is to insist that you are right and have evidence in your hand, and the so-called reasonableness must be high
In fact, I personally understand this phenomenon, just like recently after netizens found the exact evidence of "Yusi people", my voice is much louder than the other day, which is understandable.
Second, there is a lack of calm and reason when there is evidence in hand
We often say that the public is justified, and the mother-in-law is reasonable, but it is clear that there is actually only one real "reason", and the reason why many people say it is reasonable is nothing more than that some evidence is consistent with their own views, so there is selective insistence and support.
Taking this incident as an example, netizens who can get evidence should be said to have preconceived ideas, while these netizens who cannot produce evidence are completely passive, and as netizens with evidence, they cannot patiently and objectively wait for these netizens with different views to let them verify, so this is an abnormal impatience and lacks an objective mentality.
Third, it is the self-righteousness of some people that is at work
In addition to insisting on one's own opinions, self-righteousness also has a natural tendency to be above others and like to dictate to others. In fact, this is a pathology, including the so-called analysis of the upper line, including the so-called contempt of superiority, psychologically, it is not normal.
A few days ago, some people accused and criticized these netizens who insisted on "Yusi people" as collective hysteria, a collective subconscious, and a typical Mandela effect.
I will consult you now, after we post the relevant evidence, who should take the medicine?
Regarding this matter, welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss.