I wondered how Brazil lost at the 2006 World Cup. Losing? It's very scientific!
We can't say that a team with a strong squad will definitely win the World Cup, otherwise, FIFA can directly hand over the trophy to the team with the strongest squad before the game, so why hold a game? In fact, the lineup is strong ≠ actual combat ability.
Perhaps, the brazilian team's actual combat ability is not as strong as imagined, do you believe it?
Hello fans and friends, I am a senior ball blind green watchman Ah Bin who watches the ball fee, I come to answer this question, I think the Brazilian team in the 2006 World Cup can only be regarded as "paper tigers", the stars are famous, in fact, whether it is the player's personal state or the level of cooperation, it is worse than imagined, plus its own mentality is not good, and the opponents encountered are more powerful than themselves.
Losing is almost inevitable.
Let's first talk about the real combat effectiveness of the Brazilian team in the 2006 World Cup, the four kings of Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Kaka and Adriano in the frontcourt, does it look scary?
However, it is only a matter of looks.
Ronaldo had degenerated from an "alien" to a "fat man" at that time, and was swept out by Real Madrid a few months after the World Cup.
Although Ronaldinho won the Champions League for Barca, in the second half of the 2005-2006 season, Ronaldinho's form had already declined.
Adriano's peak was 2003-2005, and after the Confederations Cup shined, Inter Milan gradually fell into mediocrity.
In the front foursome, the only one in normal condition is AC Milan's Kaka, however, he and Xiao Luo can not be compatible with the "dual-core mode", the two are on the field of mutual restraint, it is simply 1 +1<2, the backcourt also let Carlos and Cafu, the two old men play full-back, do you think they can guarantee that they can complete every game straight up and down? Too hard!
That is to say, the Brazilian team's lineup is strong, but in addition to Kaka, most of the superstars are in the stage of declining status, no matter how famous they are, they are only balloon stars, only rely on eating old money, how to win?
What's more, these stars are not only in a bad state, but also all of them are masters on the field, who have requirements for ball rights and tactical authority, and no one is willing to be beaten by others, and the overall strength has long been outdated.
The brazilian stars' personal status and compatibility are inherently problematic, their mentality is not good, on the eve of the 2006 World Cup, Brazil announced the starting lineup early, and broadcast the team's training live broadcast around the world, which makes the Brazilian team have no secrets in front of their opponents.
The style of play has been thoroughly studied, and the small team can't take them, but any team with some strength can always find a way to restrain the tactics of the Brazilian team.
At that time, the Brazilian team, many stars have won the World Cup, they not only have a swell of mentality, but also the hunger for honor is not as good as before, once they encounter setbacks in the game, they will lack a response plan.
These stars are famous, does the coaching staff dare to remove some stars because of their status and tactical needs?
Can't! Everyone is afraid of this kind of public pressure.
In fact, the Brazilian team played very generally in the group stage, playing croatia and Australia, which was lackluster, and it also bullied little Japan.
In the knockout stage, although Brazil scored 3 goals, they were completely suppressed by Ghana throughout the game. By the quarter-finals, brazil had run out of three-plate axes against their old rival France.
Brazil's loss to France is really not a cold one, do you think that the Brazilian team has a strong lineup, and the French team's lineup is very poor? Isn't Turanzagnold in the backcourt a big man's thigh? Isn't Vieira Macclella in midfield the world's strongest back? Ribery is super new, does the Brazilian team have it? Henry in the front court was the strongest striker in football at that time, and Zidane, the core of the French midfield, was the best player in UEFA for 50 years!
Although the French team did not go well in the World Cup qualifier stage, after Zidane's comeback, the French team had a unified idea and a common will, and the stars were willing to sacrifice the ball for the overall tactics, as strong as Henry the Great, who was willing to serve as an sapper.
Not only do they play the Brazilian team with the overall level of cooperation and cohesion, the individual ability of the players will not be lost to the Brazilian team, coupled with the lack of changes in the Brazilian team's playing style, the player's mentality is not good, and it is inevitable to be taught by the French team.
Do you think Brazil, the 2006 World Cup, were the strongest team in the history of football? Feel free to leave a message in the comments section.