In 2010, Academician Ding Zhongliding, who participated in the World Climate Summit not long ago, participated in the "Face to Face" program hosted by Chai Jing and was interviewed by Chai Jing, a famous goddess of public knowledge at that time.
Chai Jing stood on the Western standpoint throughout the interview to make it difficult for Academician Ding, but Academician Ding was not humble and calmly refuted Chai Jing with a more scientific point of view.
Academician Ding explained to us what carbon emissions are, and the right to carbon emissions is actually a right to development and a basic human right.
At the end of the interview, Chai Jing was no longer able to control the scene, could not lead Academician Ding into the trap she had set, and had to ask: "Can [human beings] save themselves in the end, and what is our core thing?" ”
Academician Ding Zhongli replied very crisply: "It depends on culture and civilization." When human beings cope with various challenges, can they have a more inclusive and flexible civilization? Or maybe our existing civilization has a good development. ”
It can be seen that more than a decade ago, our Chinese scientists have already figured out the Intention of the West to use environmental protection and carbon emissions to make a big fuss.
Its ultimate intention is to restrict the development of developing countries, safeguard the interests of developed countries, let developed countries always stand at the top of the human food chain, and constantly exploit developing countries, so that developing countries will never become developed countries.
Carbon emissions are only a means of restricting the development of developing countries, and the reason why Western countries attach importance to them is because they are afraid that developing countries will develop and compete with them for the earth's resources.
Western countries have never really done anything practical in energy conservation and emission reduction and carbon emissions.
For this, Academician Ding also explicitly put forward in an interview with "Lu Jian" a year ago, and directly predicted: "I am here to predict to you, these countries in the West are empty guns, do you think they will really reduce emissions?" Let's walk and see. ”
Sure enough, I had to admire Academician Ding's prediction, and after just one year, his prediction became a reality.
These countries in the West are really anti-aircraft guns, and they really haven't done emission reductions.
According to media reports, Germany intends to amend the draft law to eliminate the climate target of "achieving carbon neutrality in the energy sector by 2035", and this amendment has been passed in the German House of Commons.
The European Parliament passed a voting resolution that natural gas and nuclear power can be classified as sustainable under specific conditions.
The UK and France plan to delay and postpone the closure of coal-fired power plants and restart them.
U.S. Supreme Court: Restricts the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) right to use the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.
One by one, these countries, which were once the most fierce, the countries that attach the most importance to carbon emissions, have now broken their contracts one by one, and have begun to shut up and not mention environmental protection, not to mention carbon emissions, and to restart the coal-fired power plants that they define as the most carbon dioxide emissions and the most polluting environment.
The mouth is all doctrine, but in fact, the heart is all interests.
Energy conservation and emission reduction only China is really doing things, even if the Western countries give up emission reductions, China will continue to do it.
Because China is a responsible big country, it is necessary to completely solve the problem of air pollution and look at the problem from the overall height of the development of the whole country.
Germany's measures were the most radical, simply eliminating the goal of carbon neutrality.
Carbon neutrality refers to the total amount of carbon dioxide or greenhouse gas emissions directly or indirectly generated by countries, enterprises, products, activities or individuals in a certain period of time, through afforestation, energy conservation and emission reduction, etc., to offset the carbon dioxide or greenhouse gas emissions generated by themselves, to achieve positive and negative offsets, to achieve relatively "zero emissions".
Simply put, it is to achieve equal carbon emissions and carbon absorption and storage.
This is the first concept proposed by Western countries, and the reason for propaganda is that the increase in greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide will cause global temperatures to rise, leading to species extinction. It was calculated by a research team in the United Kingdom through computer simulations.
Although this result is not necessarily scientific, the West uses this result artificially defined as science and hyped it up, demanding that the rest of the world emit less carbon dioxide.
Western countries themselves did not expect that emission reduction would actually become a stone to drop on their feet.
The outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict this year has made Western countries suddenly find that without fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas, whether they can safely survive the winter this year is a problem.
Germany is the first country that cannot be put down, and after Merkel, who really thinks about Germany, leaves office, Germany has completely become the horse boy of the United States, and everything is based on the interests of the United States, personally destroying nord Stream II, and at the same time making the running Nord Stream I half dead.
Germany, which lacked natural gas, found out at this time that the clown was actually himself, so he directly tore off the mask and was the first to announce the abandonment of the carbon neutrality target.
Carbon neutrality is originally a false proposition, and there is no evidence that global warming is caused by carbon dioxide.
According to Zhu Kezhen's "Preliminary Study of Climate Change in China in the Past Five Thousand Years", there have been many times in Chinese history when it was hotter than the present, such as the Western Han Dynasty, such as the Sui and Tang Dynasties.
At that time, China was still in the feudal period of an agrarian society, and the carbon dioxide emissions on the earth were not as much as they are now, and the temperature of the earth was still much higher than it is now.
Earth's temperature may be caused by earth's geological cycles, rather than simply carbon dioxide emissions.
Western countries have created a carbon neutral concept for their own interests, wanting to limit the development of developing countries such as China.
In the end, the Western countries still punched themselves in the face and gave up the goal of carbon neutrality first.
Unsurprisingly, Germany should not be the last to abandon the goal of carbon neutrality, and more Western countries will abandon carbon neutrality in the future.