@Will the viewer feel free
Trees are big! Recently, the rape case of Liu Qiangdong, the chairman and CEO of JD.com, by Liu Jingyao, a student of a Chinese american student who studied in a beautiful woman, has led to a punitive economic compensation case in a civil lawsuit.
According to relevant US media reports: On June 24, 2022, local time in the United States, the plaintiff Liu Jingyao v. Liu Qiangdong sexual assault civil lawsuit was held in Minneapolis (the capital of Mingzhou) for public hearing (motion hearing), which lasted four hours. The plaintiff, Liu Jingyao, attended the trial through video online, and the defendant Liu Qiangdong did not appear in court, and his lawyer appeared in court.
The plaintiff Liu Jingyao herself participated in the trial for the first time this time, she is 26 years old this year, is the sister of a student in Beijing to study in the United States, this time unveiled her previous mystery, the real appearance was finally exposed.
I originally thought that the woman who was favored by the big boss Liu Qiangdong would definitely look beautiful, but this was not the case. Looking closely, the appearance of the student sister Liu Jingyao is a bit similar to Liu Qiangdong's current wife, The Milk Tea Sister Zhang Zetian, but from the perspective of beauty and temperament, the plaintiff Liu Jingyao is really too far away. However, Liu Qiangdong believes that the family flowers do not have the fragrance of wildflowers, he likes heavy taste, animal nature, regardless of disregard, as long as it is a woman is not ugly, it will be overlord the bow.
However, there is no such thing as a free lunch. After Liu Qiangdong and the plaintiff Liu Jingyao ye huan huan, there is a high probability that there is no dollar to appease, and the plaintiff Liu Jingyao is sued to the police station for rape. After the local police station detained liu Qiangdong for interrogation, it found that the evidence accusing Liu Qiangdong of rape was insufficient, so it released Liu Qiangdong. Subsequently, Liu Jingyao proposed a $50,000 economic compensation claim to Liu Qiangdong, who ignored it, was too stingy, and only wanted to be a white prostitute, which was inconsistent with his identity as a billionaire. After two years of fruitless demand for economic damages, Liu Jingyao hired a lawyer to file a civil compensation lawsuit with the local court in the United States, and the punitive economic damages demanded from Liu Qiangdong and JD.com suddenly soared from the original $50,000 to $5 million, and the greedy side of human nature was exposed at a glance.
It is reported that the hearing mainly revolved around the plaintiff Liu Jingyao's lawyer proposing to increase punitive damages against the defendants Liu Qiangdong and JD.com, and the plaintiff Liu Jingyao's lawyer presented a number of evidences to prove that the defendant Liu Qiangdong's sexual assault under the premise of knowing that Liu Jingyao never expressed consent was a deliberate disregard for her rights and safety, and met the conditions for punitive economic compensation.
Under Ming State law, punitive damages can only be claimed separately after the discovery phase of the case.
Portion of the plaintiff's testimony published:
Regarding the case itself, the plaintiff's repeated revision of the expression "whether she had sexual relations voluntarily" became the focus of controversy, and the plaintiff Liu Jingyao said that the reason for the repeated revisions was because she and her family were harmed by the defendant.
Liu Jingyao's lawyers presented the following evidence to prove that Liu Qiangdong and JD.com's sexual assault, knowing that Liu Jingyao had never denied and/or withheld consent, was a deliberate disregard for her rights and safety, and met the conditions for punitive damages. Key evidence against defendants Liu Qiangdong and JD.com include:
1. Testimony of the waitress at the dinner restaurant that night:
The waitress of the restaurant said that Liu Jingyao was constantly poured with wine, her face was flushed, and it was obvious that she was in a state of discomfort, so the waitress took the initiative to send Liu Jingyao a cup of hot tea.
2. Testimony of the driver that night:
The driver said that he saw Liu Jingyao hiding in the back seat of the car through the rearview mirror, and when asked about Liu Jingyao being sexually assaulted in the car, the driver said, "I didn't think about this at the time, what I thought was that this powerful man was determined to get her." ”
3. Testimony of plaintiff Liu Jingyao:
Liu Jingyao said that the dinner party was poured with a lot of alcohol, which is consistent with the waitress's evidence, she begged Liu Qiangdong's assistant to send her home, after she was sent to the car, Liu Qiangdong began to sexually harass her, she constantly refused, because there is no place to escape in the car, so she can only hide in the left corner of the seat.
She thought that Liu Qiangdong was going to send her home, but she did not expect to be taken to a villa, and after her prayer, Liu Qiangdong and his assistant sent her home, and when she entered the apartment, only Liu Qiangdong followed her, during which Liu Jingyao never expressed her consent to make love.
In testimony, police asked," "Did you say no in the process when he raped you?" Liu Jingyao said, "Said." ”
From a legal point of view, among the three aspects of evidence, the testimony of plaintiff Liu Jingyao is the most important. Because this case only involves the defendant Liu Qiangdong and the plaintiff Liu Jingyao, two people who had sexual intercourse in bed, there was no third person present, whether there was sexual intercourse against the woman's wishes, the police and the court are more inclined to listen to the woman's testimony! Liu Qiangdong belongs to the "yellow mud dropped in the crotch of the pants, mud is inseparable," there is a mouth is difficult to argue. In addition, local drivers who provide evidence against Mr. Liu are likely to join the jury. Therefore, in this case, the defendant Liu Qiangdong is more fierce and less lucky, and there is a high probability that he will lose the case!
If the defendants Liu Qiangdong and JD.com in this case are ruled to be defeated by the US court, the defendant Liu Qiangdong must pay the plaintiff Liu Jingyao a punitive economic damage of US$5 million, and it is feasible for Liu Qiangdong and JD.com not to pay the plaintiff Liu Jingyao? Absolutely not working! Because JD.com is listed on the NASDAQ stock market in the United States, the US court can solve the enforcement problem through the NASDAQ, for this reason, Liu Qiangdong can only obediently surrender! U.S. rumors: After the U.S. government suppressed the Chinese high-tech enterprise Huawei Company and instructed the Canadian government to illegally detain Ms. Meng Wanzhou, vice president of Huawei, for more than three years, the U.S. government also wants to delist all Chinese listed companies in the United States and further suppress China economically. In this regard, Liu Qiangdong and JD.com, Alibaba, and other companies listed in the United States are very afraid! This is the cause of the Sino-US struggle.
Once upon a time, Liu Qiangdong, as the CEO of China's large-scale online shopping platform, was established as an outstanding young entrepreneur in the country, with a proud spring breeze and full of ambition. People are afraid of being famous, pigs are afraid of being strong. Who would have thought that Liu Qiangdong, a famous young talent in the country, did not control the zipper on his pants for a while, caused a scandal in which rape suspects were detained by the US police, and caused him to be discredited, discredited, and his glorious image was absent. The right path is: The heavens are in the heavens, and who has karma escaped? In the face of the overall environment of the US government's all-round suppression of China's development, will Liu Qiangdong be a blessing or a curse in the future? We'll see.
2022.7.11