laitimes

Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?

author:Dominate the country

Many people do not understand the "schizophrenia" in Europe, and what have they brought to themselves by supporting the United States, opposing Russia and china? Soaring prices, energy crises, refugee crises, being cut by Angsa as leeks...

Just saw a few news: Germany, which has always advertised environmental protection, is preparing to start a large-scale thermal power generation to alleviate the energy crisis, the Czech Republic is preparing to "burn everything that can be burned to heat and generate electricity", many Europeans are snapping up and hoarding wood to prepare for this winter, wood has become one of the hottest businesses in Europe, and so on. Not only that, on issues related to Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan, Europe is also closely following the United States and has repeatedly offended China.

Many people believe that the reason why Europe is like this is because the political arena has been seriously infiltrated by the Anglo-Saudis, and the people have been seriously brainwashed, so they have followed the trend of Britain and the United States. This is part of the reason, but the truth is far from simple. Today to share a European Chinese view on this issue, there are examples, there are analysis, very grounded. The following is the main text.

Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?

When I was an intern at Fiat Group, I had a master who taught me to draw, an Italian uncle in his 50s.

The uncle's education level is not high (high school), but after all, the 30 years of work experience has also caught up with the era of vigorous Economic Development in Italy, so the income is not low. His wife is a housewife, a son and a daughter at the knee, and the house with a garden, which is a typical Italian middle class.

Until now, I have regarded him as a mentor and friend because he was very patient when he first taught me.

In addition, he is very caring and helpful to the vulnerable, that is, the kind of person who can give you money directly if you have difficulties (not borrowing).

However, there is one thing he said that I still remember to this day.

Drinking coffee and gossiping about the weak Italian economy at that time somehow involved China's development (maybe there is no harm without comparison?). )

He said to me: I know that Chinese are very motivated and try to change their fate and improve their living standards. But you know, there are 1.4 billion people in China, and if everyone lives like us (Italians), then there will not be enough resources on the earth, and the world will be finished.

Frankly, at the time, I still thought his words were quite logical, but I always felt that something was wrong.....

Until later, I saw the interview of Academician Ding Zhongli angrily accusing Chai Jing:

Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?

Looking back at the uncle's words, it is obvious that they are anti-human words.

However, people who say such "anti-human" things are actually very marketable in the Western world.

For example, the Swedish environmental protection girl whose hair is not even grown.

Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?

She also came to Turin, where I was, and there were all kinds of fanatical parades and rallies in the streets.

Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?

But......

Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?
Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?

Therefore, the "goodness" of Western countries and peoples is based on the fact that they are still in the upstream of the global industrial division of labor, based on the fact that they are "cutting leeks".

If none of you in the Third World want to be leeks, who are we going to cut?

We can only go and grab it with you.

But how much is "grabbing" decent? How much does it not fit the image of our high Western society?

So, we'd better continue to cut your leeks, and then we can do charity, show superiority, and maintain our own brilliance and moral standards as superior people, right?

Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?

To put it bluntly, ideology, environmental protection, and resources are all used to coax children and ignorant people. The real reasons are actually due to interests.

The history of the development of Western countries is a history of plunder. When they seized a large number of resources, they began to work on and created a set of rules for so-called "modern civilization", playing a series of combined punches such as political output (including means of war), economic games, cultural brainwashing, etc., the fundamental purpose of which is the ultimate plunder of interests.

Western powers will never allow Asians, Africans, and a series of other "lower races" to share the earth's resources with them! This kind of racial discrimination has always accompanied the expansion of the West, and it is ridiculous that many people are now willing to be pawns for the tiger! Don't you know that if you wait until the day when the resources are exhausted, the Western elites will never give ordinary people a ticket...

Back to the topic of the article: Why do Western countries support the United States?

Because you know, the current set of "cutting leeks" system is built by the United States.

Yes, the United States has done perverse acts, the United States has done all the bad things, and the United States has a lot of them.

Almost all the Italians I know, but when they mention Americans, they scoff.

And you in China have also made it clear that your goal is only to get the boss down, not us.

But......

But......

But......

The first layer: the United States only has more than 300 million people, it is already so rogue, China's 1.4 billion people, if you become the world leader, will it be more rogue?

The second layer: If China becomes the world leader, will she support her little brother to cut leeks? If this is the case, in the subsequent global division of labor system, can we continue to cut leeks?

Layer Three: Do you think that when the United States was the world leader, our other Western countries did not oppose it? Who wouldn't want to be a leek harvester at the top of the food chain?

If I hadn't been able to fight, I would have been on it a long time ago...

Haven't you noticed that those who openly oppose the United States, regardless of black and white, good or bad, will be given the title of "anti-American fighters"?

Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was one in the world, and which other country enjoyed this treatment?

To put it bluntly, ideology, environmental protection, and resources are all used to coax children and ignorant people.

The real reasons are actually due to interests.

How many years did it take the United States to become independent from Britain? How many years has it taken to replace Britain as the world leader?

That's where China is.

If you want to be the boss of the world, you must give up your illusions and be prepared for a long-term struggle.

As for whether other countries support the United States or whether they are really supporting the United States, it does not really matter

You just have to remember one sentence

Interpretation of the Chinese in Europe: Why would Europe rather wield a sword from the palace than stand up to the United States, anti-Russia and anti-China?