Sweden's "environmental girl" Greta Thunberg once called on millions of students around the world to strike classes by virtue of the influence created by Western countries, becoming an idol for many teenagers, and even attended the climate change summit in Glasgow, England, to urge world leaders to "pay attention to climate change" in various ways. However, she did not expect that after several years of shouting for the West to reduce carbon emissions, she would become "not human inside and out".
Swedish environmental protection girl questioned "through Russia"
On June 22, an online media outlet tweeted that Swedish activists had questioned Thunberg's "Russia", citing thongberi's ties to an organization that had received funding from the Russian Foreign Ministry. The Swedish investigative body has officially opened its investigation into the matter. As soon as the news came out, it instantly caused a heated discussion on the Internet. Some netizens firmly did not believe it, and said that Thunberg did not even study for environmental protection, how could he do such a thing? But some netizens believed the news that Germany was able to bring down coal-fired power plants in Europe with the help of Thunberg's propaganda.
Just when netizens continued to question the authenticity of the news, the Russian Foreign Ministry intervened. On June 24, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zakharova posted on social platforms Tömberry's interactions with US President Biden and French President Emmanuel Macron, suggesting that relevant people check these "relationships" to see if these people have any relationship with the Russian Foreign Ministry, or whether "western regimes want to abandon her after taking advantage of it."
Eco-girls' "double standards" for China and the West
Earlier, after the Japanese government announced its decision to discharge Fukushima nuclear sewage into the sea, Thunberg, who has always advertised as an "environmental girl", only forwarded a news on his personal Twitter account and did not focus on criticism. However, in the face of China, her attitude has changed sharply.
In 2020, Thunberg issued an appeal that China, including Asians, would abandon the use of chopsticks, which had caused forest destruction. In addition, she also used the calculation results of an American Rhodium Group to say that China's greenhouse gas emissions accounted for 27% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions in 2019, making it the largest polluter. Thunberg even bluntly stated that "if China does not change its environmental policy, then we will not be able to solve the climate crisis."
However, the fact is that China's per capita carbon dioxide emissions are only 10.1 tons, far lower than the 17.6 tons in the United States. And according to data released by NASA satellites, China accounted for about a quarter of the world's new green area from 2000 to 2017, ranking first in the world in terms of contribution, and the oasis on the Gobi Desert is the best proof.
Behind all this accusation, it is only the hope of the United States and Western countries to use the mouth of Thunberg to push the crime of causing the global environmental crisis on the developing countries, and even wield the stick of political correctness to deprive the developing countries of their interests, and China has naturally become the target of the target because of its rapid development.
Many European countries restart coal power generation
Since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the European Union has imposed many rounds of sanctions on Russia, but because Russia is the largest supplier of natural gas and crude oil to the European Union, the sanctions on Russian energy have brought great reaction to European countries: natural gas and oil prices have soared, and they are facing the crisis of "gas outage". In order to alleviate the current situation, many Western countries have decided to restart coal power generation.
It is reported that in order to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, many European countries promised to phase out coal energy as soon as possible, but the decision to restart coal power generation is obviously contradictory to previous commitments. It is conceivable that once the West restarts coal, it will certainly add fuel to the already precarious global environment, and naturally it will become the object of criticism. Then the "environmental protection girl" promoted by the West will become the biggest laughing stock, so the most urgent thing is to pull Thongberry off the altar and put the hat of "Russia" for her, then everything will become logical.