Only discussIng Vietnam and ASEAN, do you look down on the arrogance of Indians?

The article is from the WeChat public account: memory bearer. Welcome to read the full article.

We talked about Vietnam in the big one, and we talked about ASEAN.

Some readers have asked me, these people emphasize the threat of Vietnam on the Internet, emphasize the threat of Southeast Asia, why not talk about India?

Do they look down on the arrogance of Great India?

I thought about it, this must be there. Generally speaking, the real god is the finale, and India is this big god.

We can ignore these foreign places in Southeast Asia, but we must show enough respect for the rise of India.

So today, in order to foil the great Indian civilization, let the Western civilization and the Chinese civilization appear to make a comparison.

Let's look at civilizations one by one, starting with Chinese civilization.

That day in the trumpet, we talked about the controversy of Confucianism and the debate of righteousness and profit.

What did the Confucian controversy come up with in the end? Or what kind of core competitiveness has been opened for Chinese civilization?

In fact, it is the great unification.

If we are playing games and giving each civilization a special attribute, then the characteristic of Chinese civilization is great unification.

Westerners have two topics that they don't understand, the biggest mystery.

The first question is why the land eventually became unified and continued. This is incomprehensible in the history of Europe's small countries.

The second question is, how did the resilience of this civilization come about? Historically, Wuhu, Yuan Dynasty, Qing Dynasty, and modern times have been constantly defeated, but headwinds can always turn over, and people are back on the table. What is cohesion? What is consensus?

We talked that day, and in the beginning, the land was a bunch of tribes. It is the same as in the West and in India, engaging in superstitions, such as merchants, living sacrifices.

Later, the whole genius Zhou Gongdan began to play with the sub-seal. His sub-sealing is still different from the sub-sealing in European history, and it has one more function, that is, to constantly worship the ancestors.

If you say intermarriage, Europe will also intermarry. The problem is that after intermarriage, their focus was on religion, but this was not the case in the Zhou Dynasty, they focused on the clan.

The surname Ji, sealed a bunch of out, and intermarried with the surname Ji, and then all became a family, into the day to emphasize, we either have a common father, or have a common father-in-law, anyway, are all fathers, so it is emphasized all day long.

This thing is very good, this is religion, and it is an evolved version of religion.

Later, the Fa came, why did they come? Because of zhou li alone, the grass-roots scheduling ability is very weak. When the Country of Lu fought a war, the princes were called Shang Dafu, and the Dafu was called Shangshi, just a few people. The Qin kingdom fought a war, directly sent money to every ordinary person, saying, don't follow me.

The previous set certainly didn't work, so the Dharma master took to the stage, and that's what we talked about that day.

The problem is that this set of gameplay of the Fa family, it is very easy to play the downwind disk, and it is very difficult to play the downwind disk, and it is very difficult to be bad.

Why do you think Qin died? In the final analysis, since it is said who gives more money to whom, and that liu bang gives more money, why not give liu bang to do it?

This was a problem that was difficult for the early fa practitioners to solve, and they dug a pit for themselves.

You opened Pandora's box and completed the external expansion by awakening people's desires, but when there is no new increment, when you encounter a headwind disk, how do you maintain the team?

None of the four civilizations I talked about earlier can solve this problem. Including Western civilization.

Western civilization was very strong when it fought a tailwind battle, and in history Rome was also a tax system, and when it won, it was very good, and once it did not go well, it would face a problem.

Why should I work for you?

This problem has always existed, and there is no solution, so Europeans will not be able to figure it out.

For example, the Soviet Union, what do you think is the substantive difference between the Soviet Union and the United States? Bone-wise, they are all descendants of Rome, and the difference between him and the United States is like the difference between his brothers, the difference between him and us, that is like the old king next door.

This is a common problem faced by all civilizations except Chinese civilization, that is, once it encounters a headwind disk, just like the Qin Dynasty.

The boss of the West today, the United States, must remain strong, because if he is not strong enough, there will be no America.

To put it bluntly, whoever gives more money to whom, you want to do it, the advantage is that you can play a lot of creativity, the disadvantage is instability.

There will be all kinds of problems, between new immigrants and old immigrants, between whites and blacks, between white people, the United States is not a country, the United States is clearly a world.

He had to keep expanding, as Rome had done, and once there was no expansion, once there was no increment, the internal contradictions were immediately exposed.

We have experienced this stage, and the way to digest it is the dispute between Confucianism and law, the debate between righteousness and profit.

The later Confucian was no longer the original Confucian. The original Confucianism was The Zhou Li, the Division, the Clan, and this set of things.

Later Confucianism was actually a Dharma practitioner dressed in the guise of Confucianism.

You can think of it as religion, you can think of it as anticipatory management, or you can think of it as flickering.

The problem is that flickering a day is flickering, flickering a thousand years, that is consensus. You see, persistence, how important it is.

What the Confucians did later was actually to clear the way for the implementation of the Dharma, two obstacles. One is to reduce management costs, which I talked about that day. The other is to persuade local clan forces to be loyal.

Therefore, Confucianism has created a new concept, that is, in the case of the disappearance of Zhou Liming, the absence of the separation of the seals, still let everyone always agree that we are a large clan.

You now know why you've flipped the headwinds so many times, that's all.

In a company, other bosses give you more money, and you betray. But it's hard to betray your dad because he doesn't have any money.

This is the thing of man, you let him recognize his father, it is not so easy; but once he recognizes, you want him not to recognize, it is not so easy.

If everyone thinks they are yanhuang descendants, you push him down, he will still get up. So America is a company, we're actually an ideological clan.

If you really want to investigate blood relations, this may not be the case. But everyone believed, and that was enough.

So, our stunt is unification.

There are many advantages to unification, as I said before, in terms of the market, all kinds of things.

In particular, you notice that when civilization expands to the point where there is no way to expand, the Great Unity is almost a god-level stunt.

Because you can maintain internal stability without expanding, which is the one that Westerners are least good at.

Of course, we look at it the other way around, and when we encounter the expansion period of civilization, the performance of Westerners is also particularly excellent, such as the Age of Discovery.

Having said all that, it's time for India to make the show.

What are the characteristics of India? is particularly stable. To be precise, in an extremely unstable environment, he can be particularly stable.

If you pull these three civilizations out for a walk, Western civilization, Chinese civilization, Indian civilization.

During periods of expansion, such as the Age of Discovery, or now we are going to colonize the universe, Western civilization was dominant.

This is true during periods of expansion impediments, such as the present, and may include the next five hundred years. At this time, Chinese civilization has an advantage.

However, in the face of drastic external changes, or blows, Indian civilization has the advantage.

Some people say that the epidemic has been raging for several years, and India seems to have no one.

In fact, this is not a big deal at all, if one day, there is really a nuclear war, such as the earth does not grow grass. Among these civilizations, it is possible to become a tinder, but it is india.

The more superstitious people are, the more stable they are. It is commonly known that those who live well do not necessarily live long, and those who live long do not necessarily live well.

Civilization is something like this, a product of the environment. It's hard for you to say anything good and what's bad.

In the face of the blue ocean, Europeans and Americans performed best; in the face of the Red Sea, Chinese performed best; but if there was no sea, the title of bat among Indians was not given in vain.

You can only say that at the current point in time, the competitiveness of Indian civilization is indeed inferior to that of Chinese civilization and not as competitive as Western civilization.

If this is the case in India, the ceilings in those parts of Southeast Asia are too low.

Just like Chen Shou wrote the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, why didn't he write the Chronicle of the Five Kingdoms?

Theoretically, there are Gongsun Du in Liaodong and Shi Xie in Jiaozhou, which should be the Five Kingdoms.

The problem was that, except for Wei Shuwu, the remaining two were not discussed and were necessary to be recorded.

The article is from the WeChat public account: memory bearer. Welcome to read the full article.