Recently, Jingdong founder Liu Qiangdong in the United States Mingzhou sexual assault case has made waves again, the local court in the United States intends to hold a public hearing on the case of JINGYAO v. Liu Qiangdong, the time is the afternoon of the 25th local time, the main content of the hearing is that Liu Qiangdong lawyers submitted an application to the court, prohibiting JINGYAO lawyers from raising some questions in Liu Qiangdong's written testimony next month. Moreover, at this trial, JINGYAO himself may appear in court to cross-examine the evidence. However, the original hearing will be canceled, according to JINGYAO lawyers, the main reason for the cancellation of the hearing is that Lawyer Liu Qiangdong applied to the court not to let the hearing be held publicly, and the result was rejected by the judge, and after the application was rejected, Liu Qiangdong withdrew the motion.
The hearing is announced
Why did Liu Qiangdong file a relevant motion to cancel the public hearing?
The main reason is that lawyer Liu Jingyao will raise some questions about Liu Qiangdong's written testimony next month, and the questions include some sensitive issues: Liu's relationship with the system, personal financial situation, and sexual relations with prior informed consent, which Liu Qiangdong needs to answer truthfully. Liu Qiangdong is definitely not willing to explode his own melon again.
Everyone is not unfamiliar with this case at all, and the details of the investigation that broke out at that time were also very eye-catching, leaving aside this fragrant topic, let's take a look at this very famous case and the social phenomenon behind it.
1. Let's first talk about the evidence level and the rationality of the incident, from the surveillance screen we can see that Liu Qiangdong and a woman named JINGYAO and another woman wearing a white dress entered the same elevator together, before Liu Qiangdong and JINGYAO out of the elevator, that is, when there is a third party in the elevator, JINGYAO always keeps a distance from Liu Qiangdong, and when getting on and off the elevator, he keeps a super high etiquette, of course, this is in front of the third party. However, when there were only two people, JINGYAO took Liu Qiangdong's arm the moment he got out of the elevator, and it was obvious that the two had enough ambiguity and did not contradict each other.
The woman in white is the third party, and enters the first elevator with Liu Qiangdong and JINGYAO
Through Liu Qiangdong's testimony again, it was determined that the woman took the initiative to invite her to her apartment, and prompted Liu Qiangdong to have a relationship with him through multiple verbal invitations in the apartment. Then, from the perspective of evidence, there is only the woman's unilateral testimony, and there is no forced and other situations, and through the causes and consequences of the incident, it can basically be determined that Liu Qiangdong encountered the immortal jump, basically similar to the situation of Kobe Bryant, the purpose is very simple, it has long been eyeing you, that is, a hard stroke, rich in the second half of life.
After leaving the first elevator, JINGYAO quickly took Liu Qiangdong's arm
2. At the legal level, not to mention the United States, talk about the country, in general, two people have a relationship, if there is no very reasonable evidence, even if the woman calls the police for rape, then in the end the court is generally difficult to determine. However, if two people have a relationship, in the absence of other evidence to prove whether the two people are forced, but the woman reports to the police and provides relevant physiological evidence (bodily fluids, etc.), then it is very likely to be convicted of rape, and, in the mainland, rape is a felony, and the sentencing standard starts at three years, with almost no probation, that is, once determined, it will face more than three years of imprisonment and a lifetime of indelible shame label.
3. Morally, is Liu Qiangdong guilty? I don't think he's guilty, but he did cheat, and even without any punishment, he betrayed his milk tea sister, there's no doubt about that. No matter how the times change, no matter how open the concept is, no matter how high the social status and how much power, infidelity is indeed immoral.
Finally, to say a few words to everyone, through this matter, to the elders to wake up, whether in foreign or domestic, with the non-marital partner, immoral I will not say, anyway, you cheated on that estimated that there is no shame.
However, you are likely to face several problems: your wife finds a big quarrel, the world knows, shame does not say that you have to scatter money, and in the end people have no money.
Also, encountering immortal jumps, losing money. Of course, if you are lucky, you will meet a fool and you will call the police to arrest him and prostitute him. But unlikely.
Finally, you accuse of rape, throw it in for three years, and then, there is no more.
When encountering sexual encounters, think more with your upper body, there are not so many good things.