P.S. the two mobile phones are only based on the latest stable version of the system comparison (IOS15.4.1 and MIUI13.0.15), subjective experience, the actual please refer to the reader's hand of the machine
In fact, in the end, these two guys are not really small-screen mobile phones, but can only be counted as the existing small-size mobile phones on the market. If you really want to say that the small screen of the Eight Classics of Zheng'er, then the mainstream brand is only Apple's mini to choose from. However, the mini positioning is obviously inconsistent with today's protagonist, so it will be skipped.
Back to the point, Xiaomi Mi 12x I think it is the best mobile phone in the Android camp with the same size compared to Meizu 18 and S22, so take it and compare it with the 13pro.
Appearance section
The appearance part, Xiaomi 12x design aesthetic this time is still better, although not particularly good-looking, but not ugly. Apple inherited the family design language that began at 11pro. In the end, which is better to see is a matter of opinion.
From the positive point of view, 12x uses a 1080p drill row screen of Huaxing Optoelectronics, and the 13pro side is Samsung's G9N screen, and the display effect is definitely better on Apple's side. But the 12x screen is definitely not bad, and there is no discomfort in the alternating use of these two mobile phones. On the contrary, in the outdoors of the low temperature in winter, the apple screen will be green, extremely green, and friends in the north should have a deep understanding, and xiaomi 12x will not have this situation.
In terms of screen ratio, 12x is reversed compared to the previous generation of Xiaomi 11, and there are different degrees of widening on all four sides, and there is no shocking feeling that the Xiaomi 11 screen feels like it is going to overflow. Apple's side is not to mention, the thick border has not improved, although the bangs have become smaller, but the bangs are undoubtedly a great damage to the integrity of the screen, so I chose the Xiaomi Mi 12x on the front.
The main way for users to interact with the mobile phone is the hand and eyes, which must talk about the feel, at this point 12x is better than Apple. First look at the paper data, the weight of 203g, Apple can be said to have created a 6.1-inch mobile phone body height, the main reason is because of "", it is too heavy.
The actual daily weight, both are pp shell + tempered film, the weight difference is still nearly 30g, this weight gap can be clearly perceived as soon as you get started, and Apple's straight border is the difference in hand to the extreme, Xiaomi this side of the film shell is still lighter than most of the naked phones on the market, plus less than 70mm width and curved back cover, it is simply a feeling of a grip.
﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌
系统体验
After talking about the appearance, let's talk about the inside, before talking about the system experience, I want to talk about the unlocking method of the two, Xiaomi uses the optical screen fingerprint, and Apple is the face unlock. I definitely prefer fingerprint unlocking, for the following reasons: when you are familiar with a mobile phone, you can use fingerprint unlocking the moment you take out your pocket, and Apple's face recognition needs to be on the face, and Apple does not swipe the screen to unlock after correctly identifying the face, but to use your hand to the bottom of the screen to slide the small white strip up to unlock, because in the logic of iOS, sliding on the center of the screen is to call up the message center, which will lead to a problem - The pose you pull out of your pocket may be various, but not any one pose will allow you to reach the small white strip at the bottom of the screen.
Therefore, in my use case in the past few months, using an Apple mobile phone often requires the following steps: pulling out the mobile phone from the pocket→ successfully recognizing the face→ adjusting the position of the hand→ touching the small white bar from the bottom to slide on the unlock. Then this series of actions down, my Android phone is estimated to have opened the vibrato brush a video.
In today's epidemic era, the disadvantage of Face ID is even more obvious, although in the 15.4 IOS increased the function of mask unlocking, but this function is not so good to use, Apple users should know that the mask unlocking security threshold is higher, not as usual at any angle at a glance can be unlocked, but to face the face, close to unlock, on this point, fingerprints are a complete victory.
In addition, when using the mobile phone lying on the side of the bed, Face ID is also most likely to fail to unlock, although there is a bright light when 12x is unlocked, but it can always be unlocked easily. Therefore, I think the most perfect solution at present is the ultrasonic recognition used by Samsung Meizu and vivo, which is extremely fast and does not require lighting.
Let's talk about daily interaction, in terms of interaction, MIUI and IOS can only say that they have each other's strengths and weaknesses.
First of all, let's talk about the refresh rate, Apple animation under high brushing is indeed quite comfortable, but in many software secondary and later pages, high brushing cannot be used, but run at a refresh rate of 60HZ or even lower. However, this also depends on the app to adapt, which is also a process, such as the early Taobao and salted fish secondary menu on the card 60 frames, the current update to the latest version can be global high brush, and then give the developers a year, should be able to see the global high brush iPhone.
Android this side is more direct, a search on the Internet, almost every house has a mandatory high brushing method. In many manufacturers' LTPO algorithm defects or app whitelist today, card force 120hz can bring the ultimate high brush experience, without a sense of fragmentation, but there must be gains and losses, which brings about increased power consumption.
In terms of UI experience, Android Apple has a long and short term with each other, let me first say a few aspects that touch my pain points:
(1) Gesture control
This miUI and other Android systems do better than Apple, of course, the best is Samsung's global side gesture customization.
(2) Multi-level pages in the app cannot be interrupted when they return
This point should be well understood if you have used Apple, for example, you are like Taobao WeChat, opened a page of many levels, want to slide back to the side, Apple must wait for one of its page switch animation to finish, in order to slide again for the next operation. On the Android side, you can quickly slide sideways, you slide a few times, you will return to the interface a few levels ago, which is undoubtedly a waste of time in the interaction of multi-level pages.
(3) Background mechanism
Apple's tombstone mechanism has good and bad, such as when the game is updated, if it is hung in the background, even if you open the background app refresh, there is still a probability of not moving, WeChat video, cut out with other applications, the screen will be directly stuck and so on. But at the same time, there are benefits, such as more power saving, you can not worry too much about the abnormal power consumption in the background, more memory saving, but the latter is not an advantage for users, for manufacturers to save costs is an advantage, after all, Apple's same model every year only has one kind of memory, not optional.
(4) Automatic tasks and shortcuts
Apple's function can be said to be extremely easy to use, Android side is afraid that only Samsung can fight with one, MIUI on 12x, really don't shame people, on these options are not worthy of automatic tasks.
(5) SOC experience
Whether the interactive experience is good or not, has a lot to do with the performance of soc, Apple's current soc performance compared to Android is already a generational leader, whether it is Samsung Qualcomm or MediaTek, in the face of powerful A-series processors, it is difficult to look back, which is also the main reason why most people feel that Apple is smoother than Android.
(6) Message push
Apple is currently the best mobile phone message unified push, can ensure that the background clean reception of messages. Although several Androids have successively accessed similar to Apple's push mechanism, with Android's current app ecology, there is still a way to go to achieve Apple's level
But the so-called success also Xiao He defeated Xiao He, in the WeChat qq instant messaging tool, Apple due to the push mechanism caused by the delayed message push is quite fatal, sometimes the notification arrives, the dialog box can not be brushed out, sometimes the leader WeChat phone is timed out no one answers, in order to receive the message push, and even sometimes there is no notification. At this point, the Android machine is doing a little better, so that Android will not leak messages.
Endurance and heat
The battery life is a single card 4g, automatic brightness, WiFi and data are half, the use of daily commuting scenarios, Xiaomi (battery 4500mha) basically only has 6 to 7 hours of bright screen, while Apple (battery 3095mah) thanks to excellent background mechanism and unified push, generally can reach 8 hours.
In terms of heat, although the 870 is still a relatively balanced processor, because the 12x fuselage is small, the heat dissipation cannot be stacked, and the daily temperature is higher than that of the 13pro, but the overall OK.
Xiaomi 12x weak heat dissipation system leads to a poor game experience, even if the 60 frame king often hits the temperature control wall when playing the team battle, if you want to play the game with this mobile phone, it is still a province, unless root deletes the temperature control brush scheduling. And the 13pro king casually pinched, without heat, so the light game link 13pro won.
image
First of all, Apple's sharpening, too disgusting, many friends should have this feeling, the pro series can only open Apple raw for post-processing to eliminate sharpening, or through a third-party app to solve, but this also increases the cost of use.
Xiaomi Mi 12x this side, is the threshold of the digital series, so the camera will not be too bad, but due to the lack of telephoto, long-distance photography or composition is relatively lack of choice.
But in any case, although Apple's over-sharpening has been criticized, it is apple flagship after all, compared to the Android high-end machines, it is only slightly tired and will not be very backward.
summary
In general, 12x is better than IP13pro in terms of feel, and the battery life is slightly inferior; in terms of performance and smooth operation, although MIUI13 has improved a lot compared with 12, Apple still has an absolute leading advantage, and the system experience is mutually long.
If you are not a user with a high demand for photography and imaging, the imaging effect of these two is actually acceptable, and the high requirements will not only buy Apple, but for people who shoot more videos, Apple is indeed the best comprehensive experience.
And Apple thanks to a15, in the upcoming summer, the experience of light use will be more advanced, the current late spring, Snapdragon 870 has begun to have signs of "fire dragon", in the case of not playing games, the daily body temperature of the 13pro is much lower than the 12x in hand.
So, for a person who does not have an Apple ecology, is the 13pro compared to the Xiaomi 12x worth entering? I think it does have an improvement compared to 12x, but it doesn't make you spend five thousand more to buy, if you don't care so much about high brushing, then the iPhone 13 is a good choice, if you are like me, high refresh rate but difficult to return, just happen to have strong financial resources, then you can choose to buy a 13pro to play.
Having said all that, what about max? If you have to have a big screen, of course, that's fine, but if you're just worried about battery life, then there's no need at all, and I'm responsible to tell you that the battery life of the little pro can already beat most Android flagships.
#Phone##iphone13##Xiaomi Mi 12## Experience ##对比 #