"Go is dead"? Even laughing at face chess can be AI cheating! Shen Ke Juban or the best proof

In March, there was an incident of "AI cheating" at the Qiqi Cup, and Zhou Weiping's initial stage was considered to be in violation of the law; Liu Ruizhi's initial stage was sentenced to a 1-year ban at the same time that he was sentenced to a violation of the law.

For this matter, Ke Jie, as the first person in Chinese Go, said more euphemistically and slyly in the live broadcast:

"I don't know anything about walking a dog illegally, I don't know anything, I 'm exactly the same as you guys"; "All I can say is that only some of the people involved, or the managers, know about it." "Although the coincidence of chess matches has reached more than 70, it does not completely prove that he has not opened (AI)".

However, when the Nine Duan Master Lian laughed about this matter, he was obviously much more straightforward:

On April 8, Lian Xiao said about this matter in the online live broadcast: "I think most of the top professional chess players, such as me, will definitely not open any AI or those things, to be worthy of themselves, this kind of ethics must have ... But there are too many chess players, and after a large base of people, there is no way to do that thing (walking the dog).

"In fact, I think those two games are really a bit clear, those two games are opened with iron"; "If they have that kind of strength, then I don't have to play."

Lian Laugh finally said: "How to say this thing, it is difficult to do"; "In fact, even if you are very weak now, you will be very worried, face chess is actually very good, if you want to open, you can't stare others so dead"; "In fact, I think it is smarter, if you want to open, he will definitely not recruit ALL AI"; "Some people just want to win chess!" ”

……

The use of AI to cheat in Go games is not only happening to Chinese chess players, on the contrary, this phenomenon has already happened more to Korean players, and many of their players have been punished for this.

In the past two years, South Korea's Shin Jin-chan has made rapid progress, winning consecutive world championships, and his chess match with Ai has also reached the level of "the first person of the year", and he has also received some doubts, such as Ke Jie, who lost to Xiao Shen, who once questioned with anti-words:

After the fiasco at the Nongshim Cup, Ke Jie commented on Shen Zhenchen: "Is this still a person? Stronger than the Alpha Dog"; "AI fit is too high", "often go to the toilet" cloud, and caused controversy.

Shen Zhenchen also expressed anger: "For the juban chess game with Ke Jie, I welcome it at any time. In order not to let others gossip, I hope to decide the winner or loser through face-to-face chess matches"; and the Korean Chess Academy has publicly stated that China and South Korea can hold a "Koshin Juban Duel".

At present, china has not made an official response. But Ke Jie personally responded: "The location of the game can be anywhere, and the prize money is swallowed by the winner alone."

In fact, at present, from the perspective of Ke Jie, Lian Xiao, and the Korean Go community's questioning of "whether Shin Jin-chan cheats on AI", it is the main reason for the "Koshin Juban Chess Showdown", and a major point to prove, not just the question of who is stronger between Ke Jie and Shin Jin-chan!

If in a more profound sense, the influence of this "Koshin Juban Duel" may also be a good proof of the debate about whether Go is dead in the AI era!

Because, the "Koshin Juban Chess Showdown" is obviously a "face chess" that is to hold a face-to-face game - this is more rigorous and standardized for cheating than online chess, and the process and result are more convincing.

For the face chess battle of "Ke Shen Juban Chess Showdown", people should not only pay attention to the question of who wins and who loses and who is stronger, but also through more data of this kind of Juban chess, to record and compare the percentage of Shen Zhenchen's ten chess matches and AI coincidence, and then compare the percentage of the coincidence between Shen Zhenchen and AI before, perhaps people can find some substantive problems and conclusions.

If, face-to-face holding of the "Koshin Juban Chess Showdown", the security of the game that "almost only wears underwear" as some chess fans say, and even the degree of control and supervision of the toilet, may prove three points:

One is to either prove that Shen Zhenchen is really through "artificial intelligence", the research and memory of AI exceeds anyone, and "Shen Gong Intelligence" is indeed worthy of the name, so as to prove that he is stronger than Ke Jie and has become the first person in today's Go.

Of course, this may also prove that whoever studies Ai more deeply and has a stronger memory ability in the future can become the king of Go - but has this deviated from the original intention and charm of human Go? To some extent, can it be said that "Go is dead"?

The second is to either see from the percentage of coincidence between Shen Zhenchen's previous online chess and AI, and this data gap when he was playing face chess, let people see that it is indeed questionable, so even if Shen Zhenchen Jubanqi defeats Ke Jie, he will also lose his reputation, and it is difficult to make people fully convinced and respected!

If people are more likely to cut Xiao Shen for AI cheating, they can also say on another level: "Go is dead"!

Third, through this juban chess war, people are more clear about the problem of whether the super Go master will cheat on AI, and therefore formulate countermeasures to prevent it, and even more to prevent "Go is dead" from going to the real end.

For example, in the future, only competitions held under strict face-to-face protective measures will have authority – even abolishing the qualification of the world series of online chess.

At the same time, for the phenomenon of AI cheating, it is necessary to implement global heavy penalty measures, such as confirming that there is a cheating, it is necessary to ban the game for life, etc. - otherwise, like Lian Xiao has now said that "face chess can also ai cheat", it is tantamount to declaring that "Go is dead" is really a reality, right? 【Original Review: Yu said that hugh】