laitimes

To prove innocence, Dong Lu gave the example of Gerald, protective reception is very important, and fans are wrong

The incident dates back to the match between China and Oman in the round of 12, the midfielder Dai Weijun counterattacked with the ball, while Yu Dabao, who was next to him, did not run quickly to participate in the attack, and did not follow up with Dai Weijun in time to seek cooperation, watching the loss of the ball.

To prove innocence, Dong Lu gave the example of Gerald, protective reception is very important, and fans are wrong

This is a very controversial picture, many fans think that Yu Dabao's choice is wrong, he is not invested enough in the game, but the famous commentator Dong Lu gave his own opinion, he said that this is a protective response, Yu Dabao did not go all out to insert the attack, is to seek to hold the ball near the midfield, organize the attack again.

This remark caused controversy, fans criticized Dong Lu for the national football lazy game attitude to excuse, often watch the ball fans think that a rare opportunity to counterattack appear, players should actively run into the attack, even if the running position for teammates to pull out the gap is a good choice.

To prove innocence, Dong Lu gave the example of Gerald, protective reception is very important, and fans are wrong

Dong Lu is biased, his views are independent, and the views of fans are very different, and public opinion is swirling, whether the fans know the ball better or Dong Lu is right, for a time there is no end to debate.

In order to calm the controversy, Dong Lu spoke up again on April 3, and he used the video of Liverpool and Chelsea in the 2007-08 Champions League semi-final as a basis to prove his point of view.

To prove innocence, Dong Lu gave the example of Gerald, protective reception is very important, and fans are wrong
To prove innocence, Dong Lu gave the example of Gerald, protective reception is very important, and fans are wrong

In the picture, Dong Lu explained gerrard's way of playing according to ordinary techniques and tactics, when Liverpool counterattacked, he chose to participate in the attack, did not do Torres to do protective reception, resulting in a gap behind him, Chelsea seized the opportunity, by Lampard straight through the defense line, directly leading to the loss of the ball.

To prove innocence, Dong Lu gave the example of Gerald, protective reception is very important, and fans are wrong

The implication is that if Gerrard knows how to protect the response, don't rush forward, stand in his place, or seek to cooperate with Torres, Liverpool will not lose points.

Protective reception is very important, the players can have multi-directional choices at that time, even if they do not actively attack, Dong Lu is nothing more than to emphasize this point of view, the fans blamed him, he just stated his understanding of the technique and tactics, not for the big treasure's package protection short, protective reception can be better and safer back to the pass, re-seek to organize the attack.

To prove innocence, Dong Lu gave the example of Gerald, protective reception is very important, and fans are wrong

Dong Lu also stressed that this controversy can end here, but this controversy is very good, after all, it is a technical and tactical discussion.

Lay out the facts, be reasonable, Dong Lu took Gerald as an example this time, trying to prove his innocence, I don't know if you agree with his views this time?

Read on