laitimes

Is best effort the biggest negative for the player? There are 3 types of best-effort rounds, and the difference is too big

Recently, some players have proposed a strange thinking. He said that from another perspective, trying your best is the biggest negation of a person, because trying your best means that even if you try your best, you can't win the game, which reflects the lack of ability from the side.

At first glance, I was really angry at this sentence, because I used to be a "small generation", often in a single row to try my best to play and SVP, I think the people who say this are those who blame their own sinkholes and blame others for not c enough players, but if you think about it, what he said is actually very reasonable.

Is best effort the biggest negative for the player? There are 3 types of best-effort rounds, and the difference is too big

The first point: the best effort is also different

If the king player plays the silver round, the winning rate can be as high as eight or ninety, while the platinum diamond player playing the silver game only has a winning rate of sixty or seventy. The king player's best effort game may be the most perfect, but the matching mechanism is helpless, while the platinum diamond's best effort game may really be as mentioned above, "try your best but the strength is really not enough to drive your teammates".

It's like the 90 points of the school bully are not good, and the scum 60 points are moving, the scum has really tried its best, but the level is indeed a big problem.

Therefore, the above-mentioned "try your best to win" is indeed a problem that reflects the limited ability.

Is best effort the biggest negative for the player? There are 3 types of best-effort rounds, and the difference is too big

Second point: the best effort of the brush

The brush's best effort is worthless and meaningless, even a tumor of the team.

When the brush is on the order, he brings it to ignite but infinitely single belt, infinitely caught, but he still has to bring it. Obviously it is a conte position, but also with the ignition, but the line is still unable to fight, the regiment of the regiment has never been regimental, only know the brush, such a best effort bureau is purely a scourge.

Here I would like to name a certain brother, basically brushes. Compression, Yong'en output frequency is relatively high, at least there is the ability to brush the field, and some heroes can not brush at all but still have to brush, and even put the line of soldiers do not brush specifically brush other people's soldiers and wilds, it is really hateful to the extreme, such a best effort is simply a side effect.

Is best effort the biggest negative for the player? There are 3 types of best-effort rounds, and the difference is too big

The third point: the logical trap of the best-effort game

Team competitions generally have variable problems, and some viewers can't see the variables, only measure others by record and honor, and when they lose the game, they get the conclusion that either XX is not OK, or XX has tried his best.

As I've written before, team competition is first and foremost about the team, and just by putting one person out to say something, then the conclusions you get must be biased, and when discussing the player, that person is either YYDS or not. When a person is singled out when discussing losing a game, then the person is not okay, or the person is doing his best, because team competition is never a problem of one person.

To take a blunt example, I took a bronze player to play the King of Kings game, he assisted me, the result must be exploded by the opposite side, but you can't say I can't, but there is an absolute short board in the team, and once there is an absolute short board, the game loses its competitiveness, just like there is a star show in the Elephant Cup GNR team, then this game is not strictly speaking.

Is best effort the biggest negative for the player? There are 3 types of best-effort rounds, and the difference is too big

Read on