laitimes

Buying a beggar's version should be looked down upon? This should not be the case with a mature view of consumption

This matter also has to be related to a message that I saw on the Internet from a while ago, the network rumors "scumbag standard" Mercedes-Benz big G to buy AG63, to less say that the lowest also has to be a G500 to drive out! What a 2.0T engine G350 drove out the door that is "punch swollen face full of fat", beggar version who buys who is harvested IQ tax!

Brother understand that seeing this kind of comment only feels an uproar, is the level of people's consumption so advanced today? A group of people on the Internet are saying that the beggar version of the G350 is not a real big G, but how much does this "beggar version of the big G" eventually land? That would be more than 1 million! You say that people who punch swollen faces and fat people don't have the money to pay more than 1 million? Besides, do you think the more expensive G500 or G63 is the real big G? In fact, friends who understand the history of automobiles know that the big G with real cultural heritage is the 300/350 series. I can't understand the brother, this year can spend more than 1 million yuan to buy a car people to be ridiculed? What the hell is going on here.

Buying a beggar's version should be looked down upon? This should not be the case with a mature view of consumption

Maybe the beginning of the article is a bit high, understand the brother to take a million-level off-road vehicle as an example, everyone feels more distant. Let's explore next, we ordinary people spend ten or two hundred thousand to buy a car, is there a chain of contempt between the height of the model configuration? The answer is that it still exists. For example, there are still some models with low-end flannel seats, and many people grit their teeth and pay more money to match a leather material. But in fact, the flannel seat is really easy to use, in the summer it is not hot ass in the winter it is not ice ass, people with this practical need to spend more money on leather seats, is it a waste?

Buying a beggar's version should be looked down upon? This should not be the case with a mature view of consumption

*Pictured above is a low-end version of the Tian Odyssey flannel seat

There is also a friend who bought a BMW 3 Series, but it is a minimum 320Li. When he first mentioned it, he told me that he planned to deduct a few alphanumeric letters of the 320Li at the end of the car, and I asked him why, and the answer was that there were 325 and 330 on the 3 series product line, and he bought a beggar version for fear of being laughed at. Brother Understand said to him at that time, there is still M3 on the 3 series, are you afraid of being laughed at by the owner of the M3 car? Buying a car is originally a matter of doing what is within one's means, not to mention that many people who buy 320Li think that the power is enough, and it is a waste to pay more for 325Li or 330Li, in fact, this is the correct and healthy concept of consumption. Under the persuasion of my brother," my friend did not tear off the numbers and letters of the nameplate at the back of the car.

Buying a beggar's version should be looked down upon? This should not be the case with a mature view of consumption

In fact, people are confident in this thing, it is for themselves. It is not that you become confident by gaining the approval of others through external things, that is not called self-confidence, that is called vanity. Paying for "self-confidence" is even more nonsense and unhealthy consumer behavior. To be honest, I understand that brother usually does not drive an express train, if you want to see the data, buy a 320Li is actually enough to accelerate me, if I choose 3 series I will also choose 320Li to family transportation, enough. Of course, the budget is sufficient or it depends on the configuration of the high-end model.

Buying a beggar's version should be looked down upon? This should not be the case with a mature view of consumption

Just as the so-called cause must have an effect, we may also find a problem, in the country is precisely because of this "high match" of some buyers despise the "low match" psychology, so that some car manufacturers' model configuration distribution is also extremely unreasonable, for example, a joint venture brand launched a 100,000 sports family car, groundbreaking with a manual version for riders to choose, but a closer look at the configuration found that it is really "beggar". This is contradictory, people who can spend more than 100,000 budgets to buy a manual transmission model is certainly not to save money (now automatic models are not expensive at all), often in pursuit of better driving pleasure to buy, under this premise, how do manufacturers know that I do not need a higher comfort configuration?

Buying a beggar's version should be looked down upon? This should not be the case with a mature view of consumption

Brother understand said so much, in fact, it is not a diode thinking to let everyone buy a low-end car, certainly not. If you say you give me a car, then I will definitely pick the most expensive configuration. We have to look at it this way, you have the ability to buy a high match and are willing to pay for those configurations, then go buy a high match. But you feel that the budget is insufficient or some configuration I just don't need, don't want to spend that unjust money, let's buy low-end or even beggar version does not stumble! I hope that everyone can consume rationally and buy their favorite models.

Read on