laitimes

Down to $1989! 48 million three cameras + 4500 mAh, why not like many people?

There is no brand sponsorship below

Down to $1989! 48 million three cameras + 4500 mAh, why not like many people?

For the term cost performance, I believe many people will be very familiar with it, right? Its practical very familiar seems to be a bit hidden, if you want to not hide the cost performance completely to say very specific, I tell you "that can be completely interpreted by the state of household name", why say so? In fact, the positive answer is "cheap", but the deep answer is "spend less money to allow users to experience the real feeling of full functionality"

If you are still willing to continue to think deeper, then I tell you that "the deeper meaning of cost performance is that you can really fully understand the needs of users, and then really design mobile phones based on a wide range of needs", if a brand can achieve a deeper realm, then in my opinion it is a super high-quality cost performance, of course, if you can do the deep realm "spend less money to let users experience the full range of functions" then it can be called the "high-quality cost performance" mentioned in the title. In short, what grade of cost performance needs to see how the brand thinks, which is very important.

Down to $1989! 48 million three cameras + 4500 mAh, why not like many people?

So, here I temporarily take the high-quality cost performance as an example, because the highest realm of cost performance to tell the truth the current can do the brand is really very small, not I look down on the current brand, always remember that in my here "nothing is absolutely good, there is no absolutely bad brand", I just realistically explain the truth, because now the brand is thinking of one thing "that is, to completely stand firm in the current radical mobile phone industry", and then in order to stand firm and do some very real things at any cost, What exactly is it? Yes, I often say "follow the trend, homogenization", and it is this trend of following the trend that makes me gradually have a tired mood for mobile phones, anyway, at present, I can't talk about mobile phones!

It is to see the current new machine appearance, performance a sample, a function of a sample, has completely lost the traditional characteristics of the brand, so I chat about the mobile phone basically has no passion, everything is so simple! If I were asked what ideas I rely on to talk about my phone now, it would be feelings and interests, nothing else.

Down to $1989! 48 million three cameras + 4500 mAh, why not like many people?

So let me talk about the quality of the price, what should we pay attention to? First of all, the endurance should be in 4500 mAh to 5000 mA-based", such benefits really keep two days a charge is stress-free" because the people who like the cost performance certainly do not have the phenomenon of heavy playing like the people who pursue the flagship, so in general, such endurance can basically meet the needs of two days a charge, and then it is the function experience "The processor remember not to care, if you care, I can only say that you are similar to the salted fish"

So many people are curious about the processor does not care, so what is the pursuit of high-quality cost performance? Taking pictures belongs to the natural realistic, the screen perception has no dead ends, the comprehensive experience perception belongs to what should be there, and finally the price level is generally speaking, the price of the generalized price-performance ratio is at the highest grade of 2,000 yuan, basically 2,000 yuan to 1,000 yuan, of course, 1,000 yuan to download me here is the low-end "useless cost performance", only you take me to the above three aspects to see the cost performance, I believe you will be able to find high-quality cost performance!

Down to $1989! 48 million three cameras + 4500 mAh, why not like many people?

Old rules, in order to deepen your understanding of the cost performance, I give an example is today's protagonist OPPO Reno7 SE, first of all, the price you like is "2199 yuan, the current e-commerce has fallen to 1989 yuan" but you should pay attention to the version is 8GB + 128GB, anyway, no matter what version, I tell you "it is a cost-effective mobile phone", this point is beyond doubt, so my consumers must know what is the price-performance ratio" I think it's a good value for money", why? Because it is basically to meet the "several factors of high quality and cost performance" that I said above, first of all, the screen uses a 6.43-inch AMOLED material straight screen, and then the rear camera is a total of three cameras "main camera 48 million pixels", and then the battery life is 4500 mAh battery, other functions do not have a 3.5MM headphone hole, there is no NFC function, in short, the machine is a practical more than everything mobile phone here!

Down to $1989! 48 million three cameras + 4500 mAh, why not like many people?

Write at the end! If you understand the master's set of rational judgments on the cost performance, then to tell the truth should be able to almost look at the cost performance very comprehensively, anyway, the cost performance is more interesting than the flagship in my opinion, because it is closely linked to the demand!

Read on