There is no brand sponsorship below
For the current mobile phone industry, if you want to ask what is the main route? Perhaps many people will say that it is a flagship, a mid-range machine, is a cost-effective, anyway, these positioning are the main development direction of the industry's relative reality, and there is not much entanglement or spitting, but today I just from the relative audience of slightly more cost-effective positioning to illustrate a certain problem, of course, if it is to say the problem, maybe I am more willing to say that it is a "phenomenon", anyway, it is called the same, why? The answer is still an old saying "a name can be very famous"
We really don't have to care so much about the name, why do we say that? In fact, more or need to care or pay attention to, I think it is "different degrees of cost performance", the so-called different degrees of cost performance is to say that "for different cost performance ratio in the end is suitable for whom", some people care about the price is cheap, some people care about the complete function, some people care about the appearance of beauty, some people care about the function is not much", but the only function to have a little black technology", with such an idea, to tell the truth you can really understand what is the cost performance; of course, the mid-range machine, the flagship is also a lot of things, We must clear our minds in order to see clearly!
In my traditional view, the cost performance has always been considered to be the first in the battery life, but now I feel that the cost performance is not simple!
Why? In fact, if it is an old fan, you must know that for the cost performance, the master has always had an idea "that is, what is the key point of the cost performance", there is no doubt that "endurance first" This is my previous view of the cost-effective mobile phone, but now with the rise of age, such a view I myself feel very superficial.
So I start to self-correct, but then I will not change the traditional essential view of "that is, the cost performance is not simple", and the original is not simple is "above the endurance", but now it is not simple, although it looks more metaphysical, but to be honest, I am more willing to affirm that today's view is the "right way", why? Because the cost performance itself is to benefit more consumers at a relatively low price, the demand "or need" is the key value of the existence of the price! And not the only endurance, of course, the battery life is basically to meet the 4500 mAh start on it!
Why is the price/performance ratio so simple? Only people with a certain degree of cognition will understand!
In fact, the answer is very simple, that is one of the factors I said at the beginning. What is it? There is no doubt that the cost performance is not what I thought before the battery life is the key, relatively speaking, "I am now more to understand the original appearance of the cost performance", in fact, to say that the source of the cost performance is "to let users try to do less money to buy the phenomenon of full functionality". But here to note that since you have chosen to spend less money, you should know in mind, what is the number? That's right, the cost performance is high, don't worry about what extreme performance and extreme functions, everything can meet the big and complete experience! It's that simple!
At present, I roughly divide the cost-effective mobile phones into several categories? Like functional cost performance, performance cost performance, appearance cost performance, other cost performance, these are different in the big and complete experience, you must have some cognition!
And today I slightly corrected a price-performance mobile phone that was biased before!
It is OPPO Reno7 SE, to be honest about this mobile phone "I at first simply thought that the key to cost performance is endurance", so there is no doubt that the advantage of the aircraft is the endurance "the so-called endurance, we have to understand two aspects, one of which is battery capacity, the other is fast charging", but now I admit that the view at that time was wrong, first of all, although my previous view was wrong, but there is one thing you want to affirm "that is, the endurance of the aircraft is definitely one of the advantages, but it is definitely not a key advantage", And a battery like 4500 mAh is basically able to meet the needs of the general machine party that is charged for two days! The key advantage of the machine is its photography skills, which must be clear!
The screen uses 6.43-inch AMOLED material, and then 90HZ straight screen design, in the photo has a rear main camera 48 million pixels "the key is coming, many people will think of landscape imaging as soon as they see the rear camera, but for the machine, this rear camera is mainly aimed at portraits", with such an idea almost understand the machine, other functions do not have 3.5MM headphone holes, there is no NFC function, in short, the machine is to meet the needs of less money has a good photo effect" Note that it is a rear portrait". That's the key!
Write at the end! Cost performance is actually very complicated, want to understand, see clearly, see clearly, the key is still to rely on the insight of our consumers!