laitimes

"White Snake Origins" was removed from the shelves at a certain station, and it is the pot of review? It may be that the copyright has expired

Sharp-eyed friends found that "White Snake Origin" was actually removed from the shelves at a certain station, and they continued to investigate deeply to find that not only "White Snake Origin", "Dragon Ball Super Broly" and "Chao Hua Xi Shi" and other Japanese comics were gone. A batch of animated films were taken down at a certain station, was it because the review was too strict, resulting in a re-examination? In fact, this time it is really not a problem of review, it may be that the copyright has expired. Let's analyze it in detail, as follows:

"White Snake Origins" was removed from the shelves at a certain station, and it is the pot of review? It may be that the copyright has expired

"The Origin of the White Snake" and "Dragon Ball Super Broly" have not been searched at a certain station

Now enter the name of "White Snake Origin" at a certain station, and you will find that the film and television column has no longer had its figure. It is only because one of the issues of "I Am a Premium Student" mentions "The Origin of the White Snake", so it will show "Film and Television (1)", and you can't find an animated movie when you click into it. "White Snake Origins" was quietly removed from the shelves, and we stripped away the cocoon in the comment area of "Green Snake Robbery", and we can know that it was probably removed around March 5.

"White Snake Origins" was removed from the shelves at a certain station, and it is the pot of review? It may be that the copyright has expired

The Japanese comic movie "Dragon Ball Super Broly", which has a super strong fight, also ushered in the same fate as "The Origin of the White Snake". Search for "Dragon Ball Super Broly" on a certain station, you will find the first video, just spit on a station to remove "Dragon Ball Super Broly", its release time is March 2. In other words, at the beginning of March, a certain station removed a batch of animated movies, and you can check your favorite animated movies, whether they are still there, and "Game Life Zero" seems to be unable to search.

"White Snake Origins" was removed from the shelves at a certain station, and it is the pot of review? It may be that the copyright has expired

Guoman and Nichiman were removed from the shelves together, and should not be the pot of review

If you only remove the Japanese comic, it is possible to attribute the reason for the removal to the head of the review, after all, it is not uncommon for the japanese comic to start broadcasting and then re-examine. But now that there is a national comic in the list of removals, it is unlikely to be a pot for review. First of all, "White Snake Origin" is broadcast on several other websites, in other words, it has not been removed from the whole network, if "White Snake Origin" really wants to re-examine, it is impossible to only remove the version of a certain station, it should be the whole network does not have to watch it, just like the first season of "Assassin Wu LiuQi" at the beginning of the year.

"White Snake Origins" was removed from the shelves at a certain station, and it is the pot of review? It may be that the copyright has expired

Secondly, "The Origin of the White Snake" has been released in theaters before, and "Dragon Ball Super Broly" has also landed in domestic cinemas. It is impossible for a movie theater to pass the review and release it, but it cannot pass the review on the Internet. If "White Snake Origins" and "Dragon Ball Super Broly" really have content that cannot be reviewed, they were modified as early as three or five years ago when they were released, and where will it be delayed until now. Therefore, whether it is from the scope of the removal or the timeliness of the removal, the collective removal of the national comic and the Japanese comic has little to do with the review.

"White Snake Origins" was removed from the shelves at a certain station, and it is the pot of review? It may be that the copyright has expired

The copyright expires and is removed, which is the most likely

Several anime movies that have been removed from a certain station have a little-known common feature, that is, they have been released in China in 2019. White Snake Origins was released in January 2019, Dragon Ball Super Broly was released in May 2019, and Game Life Zero was released in July 2019. The animated films released in 2019, which were removed in one go, should have only one possibility, that is, the three-year or two-year contract expires and there is no copyright.

"White Snake Origins" was removed from the shelves at a certain station, and it is the pot of review? It may be that the copyright has expired

There is also a point that can reasonably explain why the takedown is due to copyright expiration, not the pot of review. That is, "White Snake Origin" was taken down, but "Green Snake Robbery" was not taken down. If "White Snake Origins" has problems and cannot be reviewed, and the characters who appear in "White Snake Origins" in "Green Snake Robbery", it cannot be reviewed. But now "Green Snake Robbery" is alive and well, "White Snake Origin" is gone, can only say that "Green Snake Robbery" only bought the copyright last year, the expiration time will be later than "White Snake Origin", so a station will appear only the second part of the strange situation without the first part.

"White Snake Origins" was removed from the shelves at a certain station, and it is the pot of review? It may be that the copyright has expired

summary:

Removing anime because the copyright expires is the basis of the video platform, and you don't have to make a fuss or throw the pot to review. Although the big guys can't watch "White Snake Origins", "Dragon Ball Super Broly" and "Game Life Zero" on the bullet screen and lose some fun, but one day they should come back, what do you think?

Read on