On March 7, Beijing time, the CBA officially released the 31st theory of the regular season, the referee report of the last 2 minutes of the liaoning men's basketball team and the Zhejiang men's basketball team, according to the referee's report, the referee missed a violation of Wu's 8 seconds before half of the game at a critical moment, but the blow penalty for 2 whistle fouls was correct.
According to the referee's report, 44.3 seconds before the final game, Wu Qian dribbled past halfway and there was already an 8-second violation, but the referee did not blow the penalty. Although the scoreboard broadcast on television at the time showed that there were 16 seconds left, because the CBA timer did not show the decimal point after that, the time at that time may have slightly exceeded 8 seconds, but it did not reach 9 seconds, so the number on the timer did not change.
In this case, the referee's reaction of not making a judgment in the millimeter is actually understandable. After all, although this ball occurred at a critical moment, it was not intentional or a major misjudgment error, if it were not for the CBA's official referee report, many fans may not have realized wu's first 8 seconds violation.
At the same time, this missed judgment did not change the trend of the game, because after wuqian halfway, the Zhejiang men's basketball team small foreign aid Green attacked a mistake, and the ball was also transferred to the hands of the Liaoning men's basketball team. Although at that time, if the referee blew 8 seconds of violation, the ball was transferred to the Liaoning men's basketball team, there may be different results, and the Liaoning men's basketball team did suffer losses, but this ball they mainly lost in their grasp of the key ball.
In addition to this missed decision, the referee did not miss a decision, and the two foul blows 13.7 seconds before the end and 1.3 seconds before the end were not wrong, and the blow penalties of the whole game were not a big problem overall.