I sympathize with Ukrainian civilians and never support war, but I also oppose those who follow the ass of the United States and NATO countries and blindly accuse Russia of saying that Ukraine has the right to determine its own path.
Ukraine is the United States on the ladder, Ukraine anti-Russian in the interests of NATO, the United States and other NATO countries will of course raise the banner of justice, propaganda, demonstrations, aid, economic strangulation, let you think of anti-Russian arguments and Russian issues.
I think some people really don't know what NATO's eastward expansion is and how far it has forced Russia.
Let's look at history.
The collapse of the Soviet Union into 15 countries was in 1991, which represented the end of the Cold War and the formation of the "one superpower, many powers", when the United States became the only superpower.
Eight years later, when former KGB Colonel Putin became president of Russia, he strongly felt the oppression and persecution of the United States.
In 1999, Serbia, Russia's historic satellite country, was bombed by the United States for 78 days. In the same year, the former Warsaw Pact countries of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland were incorporated into NATO.
So what is NATO going to do?
The collapse of the Soviet Union was the result of the so-called "peaceful evolution," while the United States adopted a policy of "infiltration" and "encroachment" for the expansion of the former Soviet Union.
That is, the Eastward Expansion Plan, which includes Central and Eastern Europe, is also called the "Partnership for Peace Program.".
The word "peace" focuses on effectively controlling the free zone after the collapse of the Soviet Union, weakening Russia's power, and preventing it from rising again as a threat. "Partnership", on the other hand, lies in military protection and economic support, which is of course very tempting.
But for Russia, of course, it can only be the opposite of security.
It is even more of a breach of contract.
Because NATO has no objection to being a military organization, when East and West Germany were merged, NATO solemnly promised that it would not expand eastward by one inch; when the Soviet Union collapsed, all countries that joined it, including Ukraine, also solemnly promised not to join NATO.
But once NATO began its eastward expansion, it would never stop, and in 2004, with the incorporation of Slovenia, Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Romania, and Bulgaria, NATO added three more former Soviet unions and three former Warsaw Pact countries.
Georgia and Ukraine, the two countries bordering Russia, embarked on the road to NATO in 2008.
The main reason for this is that NATO, in its Bucharest Declaration, has particularly emphasized that an attack on any member of NATO is against all of them.
Then the three items of security, political support, and economic assistance will inevitably make pro-Western Georgia and Ukraine feel like chicken blood.
Unfortunately, the side of the bed did not allow others to snore, this year of political civil unrest in Ukraine, Georgia broke out of the South Ossetia incident, Russia's "peacekeeping forces" immediately began.
They liberated South Ossetia and advanced all the way to Gori, Stalin's birthplace.
Russia's 2008 military campaign was also accused by the United States of being a war of aggression, but an EU investigation at the time pointed out that the war was waged by Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili.
And Bush, who has repeatedly promised to "end the tyranny of the world," of course, watched Russia finish things and only spent a few mouthfuls of spit.
To join NATO, it is necessary to open up the territory, territorial waters, and airspace, allow the United States to establish military bases, and deploy military weapons and facilities; in short, after five eastward expansions, the US-led NATO has isolated and covered Russia to a considerable extent, but they say that this is purely a defensive alliance.
It's like saying that you are rich and see me as an enemy, and even if I don't do anything, you have to take care of me. You bought all my neighbors, dug trenches around my house, and set up cannons, but I was stupid enough to say that you didn't mean anything.
Therefore, Russia must oppose NATO's eastward expansion, and when Ukraine is also included in NATO, it must be urgent. Putin and the Kremlin are bound to draw a security red line and issue a warning for this "life-and-death issue."
But if the warning was useful, there would be no war in the world, so they both kept wrestling with the issue, Ukraine continued to jump up and down, and Zelenskiy even made a fuss more than the United States.
He probably did believe that the United States and the nato powers would rush to protect him at a critical moment, and his country.
After the war between Russia and Ukraine, I have seen many people say that Ukraine is a sovereign country and that people have the right to choose. I think you really stand and talk without waist pain, and you are used to playing a hero.
Not to mention that NATO's eastward expansion is based on hypothetical grounds, aggression, provocation, and the breaking of treaties; the premise for any country to join the military axis is not to endanger the security of other countries -- Ukraine is reasonable and untenable.
First of all, the basis for the continuous eastward expansion of the United States is to take Russia as an imaginary enemy, and Russia has actually done nothing, which is typical, I think I am reasonable, and the fist is the grandfather.
Then, the United States has been using Ukraine to pursue anti-Russian policies, propaganda, agitation of anti-Russian hatred, and in the negotiations, it has taken a tough attitude, saying that NATO's policy is open and any country can apply for membership, which will not change. So why did Russia apply so many times, but it was rejected?
This shows that the eastward expansion of the United States is aimed at Russia.
So here's the problem.
I have no intention of occupying, and for security reasons, I hope to live in peace in the future, what do you shout all day long that you must join NATO for the sake of security defense?
NATO's intentions are so obvious, and my security environment is so deteriorating, why do you have to be in the camp of expansion and threats to me?
It's like you're my neighbor, watching someone try to pick me up, but you're on the side of my enemy, not only waving the flag and shouting, but also dancing with guns and sticks.
What does the United States do? It is not dry for 108,000 miles, and it is acceptable because it is too weak.
Then, I will definitely have a deep hatred with such a neighbor, and you will too.
In order to protect myself, I will first restrain the enemies around me, and you will too.
The more zelensky, who knows the meaning, has a tough attitude, the more he has to join NATO, the more he is more happy than the United States, the more it shows that he has the intention of making enemies of me, wants to put a knife in my neck, wants to just take his own path, let others have no way to go, you say that neighbors like Ukraine are not undercovered? Does Russia want to fight?
This is already a direct threat! And it is also in the case of many fruitless negotiations, many warnings are ineffective, I have been on the horse, you are shouting to let the horse come.
Therefore, this incident is undoubtedly provoked by the United States and NATO, and Ukraine has willingly made a tool. Zelenskiy, who has been encouraging the people to "defend the country and defend the country," is forcing Putin to solve the problem without saying anything unexpected.
In fact, Biden also helped Putin a lot during this period.
Russia's security threat is so great, but Putin is only now willing to do it, which undoubtedly shows that he is very scrupulous and does not want to start a fight easily. But after the crisis, Biden said it every few hours: We are not going to go to war in Ukraine.
They have tied Zelenskiy to a chariot, but they are only willing to give some oil money, so what is Russia waiting for? So it ends up being particularly funny.
If NATO is only for general defense, in fact, the purpose has been achieved, it does not necessarily have to be Ukraine.
If the United States could relax on Ukraine, this war could be avoided. So the United States is fighting for a movie?
Obviously, the United States is also very suspicious of Russia, and it is not ready to go to war with Russia.
Therefore, from the perspective of war strategy, I think Russia is a bit mother-in-law, too soft.
When war has broken out, the hopes of peace between the United States and Russia will be dashed, and the conflict between the two sides is bound to end in the defeat of one side, so Russia should not look east and west and shrink its hands and feet, but should use the momentum of thunder to play a mighty wind and not give the United States the opportunity to speculate.
If Russia can quickly capture Ukraine, the United States can only be timid, but now, it has made the United States and NATO gradually louder, and military assistance has become more and more large, and even Zelenskiy has begun to refuse peace talks.
This also seems to prove that Russia, which has far more military power than Ukraine and knows Ukraine very well, is not fully determined and prepared. At least at first.
• END •
Text/Nine Crows
Graph/Network