@Shen Yi: As far as the current situation is concerned, whether it is the insight of senior strategic researchers into history, the induction of contemporary American researchers based on THE practice of US strategy, or the practical experience hidden in the diplomatic archives of the US government, they have not been able to overcome the optimism brought about by "winning the Cold War" and have not been able to block the erroneous idea of "enjoying the dividends of the Cold War at will without bearing any price for it". Of course, a large number of facts that have been observed by all parties around the world also prove that NATO, like a delicate but crude beast, has been frantically advancing on the delicate geopolitical map of Europe for nearly 30 years, and after successfully forcing Russia into the corner of the national strategic choice, it finally ushered in a somewhat unexpected but completely reasonable Jedi counterattack that may be somewhat unexpected for washington policymakers.
Overall, this is the eve of the United States and Western countries maliciously consuming the Cold War dividend, and after making a series of cross-corroboratable and interactively enhanced wrong decisions in the objective and subjective dimensions of NATO's eastward expansion, russia was finally forced into a helpless situation of "either eruption or slow extinction". And the real development of the situation has also declared to the world: after a big country is forced into the Jedi, it will take all means to fight back, including the use of force.
