Inscription: Most of the time we are always indifferent to the suffering around us, but after a short period of understanding a tragic life, we can't help but burst into tears.
(i)
Hu Xijin said: Poverty is the source of many tragedies and the source of many evils. I agree with this statement, and I hold it when I analyze Atta.
He then explains why: poverty produces ignorance, dharma blindness, and numbness to sin and injustice. This is a high level of reality, and people who do not understand the situation of the concentration of the poor (such as many rural areas) cannot think of this.
Then he explained: I think that the "eight-child mother" in Feng County belongs to the typical situation of poverty and evil.
(ii)
Guo Songmin retorted: Nonsense again.
He stressed: According to Marxist theory, private property and exploitation and oppression based on private property are the source of all evil! It is this form of ownership that creates poverty and evil.
What I can't figure out about this is that There should have been no private property in China for a certain period of time, and there should have been no exploitation and oppression based on private property. Mr. Guo's remarks are not wrong in class society, but in today's China without classes, does it allude to the sharp class contradictions in China, or does it mean that there is no evil, and the evils that are now said are all imagined by everyone?
Mr. Guo said: To speak of poverty as the source of evil is actually to slander the poor as having original sin and therefore to accept the rule of the rich.
First of all, how does the logic of saying that poverty (he changed the word) is the source of sin, that is, slandering the poor for original sin? Poverty is backward, that is to say, the poor are backward? Can't poverty be associated with any negative vocabulary, otherwise it would be a criticism of the poor? Can poverty only be praised? We can't read the writings of great men, and we can't read many policy documents.
Second, why must we accept the rule of the rich, can't we get rich first and get rich later? Can't we help the poor? Can't we get rich together? Is this a satire of common prosperity?
Mr. Guo said: This remark once again proves that the lack of running dogs of the rich is an objective existence! Not only has it not disappeared, but it often pretends to be positive energy.
Mr. Guo opposes capitalists, which I understand but may not agree with (I oppose unscrupulous capitalists).
I don't know how Mr. Guo defines the rich, but in the eyes of ordinary people, the so-called middle class should be the rich. The vast majority of these people are industrious and hard-working, can't we praise them, otherwise we will lack lack of running dogs? Can I guess: according to Mr. Guo's logic, all people can only speak for the poor and live according to the standard way of the poor? I don't know if Mr. Guo is living a poor life? Have you paid attention to the suffering of individual poor people and helped them out of trouble? Or in the name of positive energy, scolding the rich, earning the money of the poor, and living the life of the rich? Praising North Korea without naturalizing north Korea is the same as praising China but moving to the United States. It's the same thing, so how to describe it?
(iii)
Think about why the Afghan Taliban won? Because they are on the side of the poor and ignorant people of Afghanistan, they are the choice of the Afghan people.
Uninterrupted poverty of more than one generation inevitably leads to the overall ignorance of society, which is accompanied by anti-intellectual and anti-human, who do not understand what science, democracy, and freedom are, and do not understand the checks and balances of power. Ignorance is not necessarily uncultured, and ignorance without culture is necessarily ignorant. War is destroyed, collective poverty, teenagers do not go to school, everyone has no culture or cultural faults, smart people manipulate people's hearts, solidify positions and stand unreasonable, and regions fall into ignorance, which is the seven-step method of regional ignorance.
If the people are not anti-intellectual and anti-human, they must first open up the people's wisdom and eliminate ignorance, based on being able to read and learn, provided that they do not die of hunger and forcibly eliminate illiteracy. It may only take a decade or two to change poverty in a place. But to sweep away the ignorance of a place, it will take at least sixty or seventy years, until the illiterate generation, the generation whose ideas are poisoned, completely lose their influence on society and the family, and until those who have undergone the influence of modern civilization become the mainstream of society.
Three generations out of the nobility, the first generation of illiterates sent the second generation to study, the second generation of educated people with the third generation to learn civilization together, the third generation grew into the mainstream of society. Look, from the beginning of literacy, to the third generation of the last batch of illiterates of this generation, and even to the fourth and fifth generations to open the people's wisdom, how can it be done without sixty or seventy years? It can be seen from this that China's compulsory literacy was an immeasurable act of merit and merit.
Compared with the uselessness of reading, everyone wants to read, read good books, and read good schools. As long as everyone wants to read to change their destiny, and the state gives everyone the same opportunity to read, that is, everyone wants to read, everyone has school, and everyone has culture, this country and nation will not completely sink and will not be isolated from civilization.
Knowledge will gradually lead people to find wisdom, goodness and justice, especially when they are not utilitarian (such as after retirement), they will not speak blindly with their conscience, but tell the truth, seek the truth, and believe in the truth. In this way, civilization stands tall and is guarded. China is at least a generation away from the reform and opening up of the true aristocratic society. Not to mention Afghanistan!
Decades of peace, a unified regime, an enlightened political atmosphere, basic people's livelihood, and compulsory literacy are all in place, and only after sixty or seventy years will Afghanistan be able to enter a normal human social civilization. Any attempt to transform an ignorant, backward, closed country and region into a civilized society in the short term is 100 percent doomed to failure.
Ignorant, backward, and closed areas can only be stabilized first, and slowly promote the society to be enlightened and enlightened. If you try to advance quickly, society will be chaotic, and there will be forces that use ignorance, retain ignorance, and even create ignorance against civilization.
Civilization is in a fierce head-on conflict with ignorance in the area of ignorance, and there is no doubt that civilization cannot overwhelm the snake of ignorance, unless it is eliminated, but it is not civilization to choose such a bloody approach.
About the author: Autumn dreams are quietly drunk, Jiangxi tourists tour the Xijiang River, and they like to think wildly after work.