laitimes

Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside

author:Basketball three-point line

Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with that view ❓?

One, identification; the two are extremely talented.

2. Disagree, for the following reasons;

1, putting aside the offensive firepower, Cartermady's defense and Jordan Pippen are 18,000 miles apart, Jordan Pippen can be said to be the best outside combination in the history of the NBA defense, the two have occupied the defensive position for many years, and Catarmedi has never been selected for defense

2, the offensive firepower is not in a grade; Jordan + Pippen is significantly stronger than Maddy + Carter.

3, the ability to lead the team is not in a grade; Jordan and Pippen have joined forces to reach the finals 6 times, and they can also lead the team to the semifinals alone; On the side of Carter maddy, Maddy has never led the team to the second round.

【Data Comparison】

Jordan: 30.1+6.2+5.3+2.3+0.8,49.7%, 32.7%

Pippen: 16.1+6.4+5.2+2+0.8,47.3%, 32.6%

Maddy: 19.6+5.6+4.4+1.2+0.9,43.5%, 33.8%

Carter: 16.7+4.3+3.1+1+0.6, 43.5%, 37.1%

#NBA# #NBA Spit Conference # #乔丹 #

Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside
Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside
Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside
Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside
Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside
Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside
Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside
Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside
Worm Borges: "Cartermedi could have been Jordan Pippen!" "Do you agree with this point of view ❓, one, agree; the two are extremely talented. Second, do not agree, the reasons are as follows; 1, put aside

Read on