1
I love kebabs, and loins are my favorite.
How much do you like it?
There was a time when I had gout and my legs hurt when I ate my waist.
So I always warn myself.
When eating your waist, remember to bring crutches.
Nice loins.
It would have been even more delicious if you could eat with friends you have a good relationship with.
Last night I ate with a friend of the base, this friend is a doctor, usually speaking is always more cruel, very suitable for drinking.
We talked and talked about the death of dignity.
Based on this news.
Little fat man, he said, before we joked, saying that it was enough to live to 60 years old and not occupy the resources of the earth.
I said, remember, at that time, it was also negotiated that if they were all single dogs when they were old, they would sign each other and pull out the tubes.
Ji You bit down on his waist, and the waist bar stiffened a little, and continued.
Little fat man, pull your tube in advance, you know that there are representatives who proposed to accelerate the process of promoting the legislation of dignified death, and then the National Health and Health Commission officially replied, saying that there are controversies in the relevant legal, medical, and social ethics circles, and social understanding is not unified enough, and it is necessary to continue to study the relevant work in depth.
I said that I watched the news, I think this is actually a good thing, ah, people should be able to decide to go on their own dignity, right?
He said no, the Health Commission's concerns are correct, and the so-called death of dignity sometimes does not necessarily have dignity.
I thought about it from his point of view, and said whether it would be difficult for you doctors to do it, after all Hippocrates said...
Before I could recite the Hippocratic Oath, I was interrupted by a friend.
No, no, death with dignity and euthanasia are not a concept, euthanasia is an active hastening of death, death with dignity is a natural death achieved through palliative and palliative care, and there is no professional ethical dilemma of doctors.
I said, according to your statement, or passive euthanasia, you who study medicine should not learn the Internet to engage in black talk.
He said that no matter what it is called, death with dignity or euthanasia, in fact, similar debates have been going on for many years, and in 2013, representatives of doctors at the two sessions gave data, saying that one-third of the critically ill patients in the hospital were needless to rescue.
After all, modern medicine is not theology, and some diseases have not yet been conquered, dragging on, and only allowing patients to suffer in vain.
People are really spending money to find guilt.
I said, you are a bit of a shadow of the house of cards, fortunately you are not really authorized to pull my pipe.
Ji You said, then you think, if you are in an irreversible coma, or simply the end of life, the upper tube is to use life support equipment to extend the life of life for a few days without quality of life.
Then, at that time, you were worse than the animal without a waist, not only did you not have a choice, you could not move or say it, just like when I was a child, I scratched your arm socket hard, but there was no end, even if you spit white foam I continued to scratch, do you want to have dignity at this time to simply go and chat with Yama?
I said, I am an atheist who does not believe in Yama, but listening to you say this, you are in favor of a dignified death, how can you say that dignified death has no dignity?
Ji You washed the waist of his mouth with a beer.
There is no problem with dying with dignity itself, but I also feel that we can't do death with dignity now, and the reply of the Health Commission is really to understand human nature.
From a purely medical point of view, dying with dignity has a meaning, but go to the ward to stay longer, little fat man, you know that things are not so simple.
This meal, I invite guests, I am actually not very voluntary, is that you said that the last time you asked me about me temporarily, then this meal wants me to please, I also think that there is nothing wrong with your statement, so I pay money.
It seems that I have a subjective consciousness, but in fact, I am forced by the form, but the cost is not so high, I don't care.
The Netherlands was the first to pass active euthanasia, so open a country, all kinds of emphasis on the importance of the individual will, at that time in the Senate vote, it was also reluctantly beaten a five-to-five, and finally 46 in favor of 40 against the adoption.
In addition, the hospital must determine that there is no possibility of cure, the hospital determines that the patient himself is suffering unbearable pain and the medicine cannot suppress this pain, and the patient needs to agree in a sober state, and finally confirm it repeatedly.
The core is to make decisions in person, but my will is often influenced by other factors.
Just like the staff of the red light district are also voluntary, they can stop at any time if they want to do it, but he does not dare to guarantee that there is no "voluntary" in this voluntary.
It may be for money, it may be for the family, and essentially the choice of selling or not selling is not independent.
In reality, so many people in the workplace have no overtime pay, do you say that everyone is voluntary?
But when you really ask, everyone needs this job and may be volunteered.
I took a sentence, there is no filial piety in front of the bed for a long time, the pressure of the family, the cliché.
He said that although the medical security is getting better and better, it is impossible to avoid it, and for some patients, the part of the medical cost that needs to be borne by themselves is still heavy.
Note that I am not talking about the situation of the family, most of the family members, whether verbally or in actual action, actually continue to treat at all costs.
But the patient himself also has perception.
Even if their own children and old wives do not mind selling houses and hollowing out their family property to save people, patients know that this is not a long-term solution.
These invisible pressures can be resisted at first, but I am afraid that this is a fishing arm socket without a progress bar.
So it seems that individuals can make choices, but in fact, there is no choice, if the dignity of death legislation can be implemented, then the high probability, people with weak economic conditions will embark on this road, active passive choice.
Do you remember when we were young when the two of us skipped Olympiad class and went to the Internet café to play?
You were caught by your father, giving you two choices, directly in the Internet café or go home to fight, you have a very backbone to choose to start a fight in the Internet café, because you think that your father will hinder others from watching and will lightly click.
I knew then that your boy would be an absolute hooligan in the future.
If you get beaten, you have to engage in moral kidnapping.
I said of course I remember, but you can't forget that I proposed not to hit me at the time I wrote a review of this plan that was rejected by my dad.
Ji You said, yes, you were just a child at that time, and it was inevitable that you would be beaten.
The right to choose seems to give you, but in fact it is not given to you, color is empty, there is also nothing.
Even if I say from a medical point of view, although your disease cannot be cured, but it is handled well, there is still a life expectancy of half a year or a year, and the patient himself will calculate it, which is not worth it.
At that time, money has become an invisible threshold for dignified death, whether there is dignity, or when to choose "decent", depends on the foundation of the family.
Money is in charge.
Money is the king of the bastards, but also the unlucky eggs.
I said, that legislation dignified death, not to say that there is no treatment, but the last journey to let the patient go a little easier, can you save a few dollars?
Ji You said, little fat man, you still don't understand, this is not a matter of saving a few dollars in the last step of dignified death, but a matter of pulling the whole body after the mouth is opened.
This mouth has two torn directions.
The first is how to define the criteria for achieving the option of dying with dignity.
What is called dying is difficult to clearly define.
For example, cancer, we all know that it is a terminal illness, but some cancer treatment is well controlled, it is entirely possible to live for another ten years, and the quality of life is not bad, even if it is advanced, it cannot be said that it is dying.
This is not a game, see the blood bar red on the line, you see Schumacher, after the ski accident the doctor directly said that the probability of waking up is very low, basically a lifetime is a vegetative person, at this time in fact, it will reach the standard of dignified death.
In the end, Schumacher woke up from a coma for 5 years, which cannot be said that there was a problem with the medical evaluation at that time, which was a hammer that could not be re-read, and the standard was difficult to determine.
Open F1, and open OFO, the physical state is not the same.
Moreover, even if complex decision-making processes and detailed supporting systems can be designed for different conditions and even different patients' physiques, in the end, it depends on the discretion of hospital doctors.
Doesn't this add to the mental burden on our doctors who are already too tired to do it?
Since it is a person to judge, the mistakes are not said, and there may be some human factors.
I often see patients who choose conservative treatment after listening to our doctor's diagnosis, what does this conservative treatment mean, you know, I know, everyone knows.
Seeing through and not saying broken, sometimes it is a kind of torture.
I had a patient before, lung cancer, said that it does not cost that money anyway is a terminal illness, go back to my hometown for conservative treatment.
After this old man goes back, it hurts, the painkiller can't hold back, it's dry howl, what to do?
I think I'm a bastard.
But I really don't know what to do.
When I see such a situation, to be fair, I will feel that the old man may be a relief for himself, then at this time I come to the standard of dignified death to judge, it is difficult to ensure absolute fairness and justice.
Maybe people don't want to leave?
I said, that is, the standard of dignified death is not set, and there will be human factors that will affect it, and the decision-making power will still fall on the economic basis, and Schumacher's awakening finally cost 1.8 billion.
After another glass of wine, Ji You continued, and there is a second, how to define the precondition of not accelerating or postponing.
The biggest difference between death with dignity and euthanasia is that it does not accelerate or postpone it.
Let's assume that there is no problem with the determination of whether it is possible to carry out a dignified death, so how to get to the step of going with the flow is actually exquisite.
I tell you little fat man, many times when I discuss medical solutions with patients, we talk about high-risk treatment methods that we dare to propose only after watching people get off the dish.
Otherwise, I wouldn't have sent our doctor away.
Some patients will take the high-risk treatment choice as the final solution, and if they are cured, they will stop the bleeding, and if they can't be cured, they will still stop the bleeding.
Even if I don't choose high-risk treatment, I am afraid that someone will accelerate myself to the threshold of a dignified death.
What should I do if I don't take medicine, don't cooperate with treatment, and drag myself to the standard of death with dignity?
Moreover, even if it is not active acceleration, just knowing that there is a barrier to death with dignity, and having to make a choice at that time, this mental pressure will have an accelerating effect.
The influence of the mind on the body is not a metaphysical problem, it is actually a scientific problem.
Every day, when I think about going to work, I have a real headache.
I probably understand the meaning of this layer, saying, you think that after the death of dignity legislation, there will be a situation of excessive death of dignity, similar to the opposite of excessive medical treatment.
People who choose to die with excessive dignity think that instead of dragging down their families and dragging their relatives to complain about their uneasiness, it is better to cut themselves off as soon as possible.
Ji You said that this is basically the meaning, dignified death is only the last step, considering the previous treatment costs and maintenance costs, it may make some people who have no confidence and the disease just positive to ask for a pain.
No way, if the little fat man you stay in the hospital more, you know that as soon as this mouth is opened, many things will inevitably happen, you can say that this is the weakness of human nature, it can also be said that it is the strength of human nature, and the observation angle is different.
Therefore, the Health Commission's refusal to popularize death with dignity at this stage is not a simple binary choice between good death and lai life, but to protect the right of people to choose to live.
A lot of things, you are not happy with the mouth, people will not make this choice.
Once the mouth is opened, things really have the potential to slip.
Magical, yet realistic.