Li Chengru's new program "Drama Confucian Life" has been broadcast for 8 episodes on a video platform, during which Li Chengru has also released a lot of "amazing words", and also exposed a lot of chaos in the entertainment industry, which has had a certain impact in the market.
However, as the program was broadcast one after another, there were many voices that resented Li Chengru, and they all felt that his show was preachy and full of strong personal aesthetics, not so objective.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="3" > Li Chengru said that the 9.3 points of "The Last Emperor" is not much better</h1>
In the latest episode of the program, Li Chengru talked about the historical issues in costume films, and he was very opposed to the story recreated for some changes in history, emphasizing that history should be corrected.
When talking about this issue, he mentioned Zun Long's version of "The Last Emperor" and said that he didn't think the film was so good.
For his statement, many netizens feel that it is too arbitrary.
Li Chengru's evaluation of many works seems to like to kill with a lever, such as the evaluation of "not much good", such as "general", and there are few in-depth and simple analysis, just pick one or two key points to mention.
For example, he said that "The Last Emperor" is not good, because he feels that it does not seem to be completely in line with history.
However, Li Chengru's evaluation is actually a "reverse" static evaluation, and he does not seem to understand the preciousness of the movie "The Last Emperor".
Things are developing, and if "The Last Emperor" of that year were to be filmed now, it would not be a big deal, but in that era, it had a special significance.
In that era, when we photographed emperors, they generally had a clear angle, such as photographing Tang Taizong, that is, photographing the style of a founding emperor, which must be based on praise. For example, if you shoot the king, it must be absurd, how bad it is.
And "The Last Emperor" is to shoot Puyi as an ordinary person, and the director intends to truly reflect the mental journey of this person who was born in the imperial family but was the last emperor. The whole film does not praise or disparage Puyi, but only shoots him as an ordinary person and tells the story of a person.
Secondly, the film's treatment of art is also amazing, and the actors in the film are also very good, synthesizing all angles, netizens have given this movie a high score of 9.3 points.
Therefore, Li Chengru casually said that these classic works are not very good, which seems a little too arbitrary.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="15" > Li Chengru also approved "Iron Tooth Copper Tooth Ji Xiaolan", "Zhen Huan Biography", "Wulin Wai Biography" and so on</h1>
In fact, it was quite a surprise to see this "Drama Confucian Life" at the beginning, after all, Teacher Li Chengru has been in this circle for so long, seen a lot, and it is all real, and everyone wants to hear him talk about the secrets in the circle.
I just didn't expect that later, this program basically became a program for Li Chengru to publicize his personal aesthetics, and the views were relatively common subjective.
For example, for some popular dramas such as "Iron Tooth Copper Tooth Ji Xiaolan", "The Biography of Zhen Huan", "The Tale of Wulin Wai" and so on, he has a negative attitude, either saying that he does not respect history to teach bad children, or he says that the filming is nonsensical, and he is not cold to Qiong Yao drama.
Teacher Li Chengru has a very representative point of view, for some people who come home from work and want to watch TV entertainment, he said that watching zhengshi can be entertained, without watching TV dramas.
This view, how to say it, is a bit overwhelming.
The world is now diverse, the way of entertainment is also diverse, not everyone can find happiness by reading history books, and everyone's interest points are different. Times are progressing, should we destroy all television sets and reopen bookstores?
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" Data-track="22" will > recombine historical stories to create new stories? </h1>
In the latest program, teacher Li Chengru put forward a point of view, he said that he has been depressed for 20 years, that is, he is not used to watching some film and television dramas that do not respect the real history, saying that this will teach bad children.
There are both proponents and opponents of this view.
Proponents said they are really worried that children will take the content in the film and television drama as history.
But opponents say it's excessive paternalistic anxiety, have you asked your child? Have you ever seen a kid who doesn't believe in textbooks because he watches TV dramas and treats them as history? Are we underestimating the intelligence of our children and viewers?
Frankly speaking, when I was a child, I especially liked to watch Hong Kong's costume TV, and many historical figures were indeed known through TV dramas. However, I will also find that every time the hong Kong TV series finishes the opening of the theme song, there will be a sentence stating that this story is really fictional. Through these TV series, I will also be interested in some history at that time, and I will choose to go to the bookstore to find relevant history books and understand that period of history, and I will never think that the history on TV is history.
These televisions, which distort history to a certain extent, did not distort my historical common sense, on the contrary, they made me quite interested in history.
Of course, this is only my personal experience, not universal, only as a reference.
If our costume TV series were all filmed according to the history, would the audience watch it? First of all, many viewers will not like to watch, because there are wonderful parts of real history but not many, and it will become very dull. Secondly, since they are all filmed according to history, if it is only the same history, it will be similar, but the space for creation is narrow, and the creators are estimated to have basically given up.
The final result is that everyone abandons historical dramas and goes to shoot overhead fantasy stories and xiu immortal stories, is this the result we want?
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="32" how > evaluate "Confucian Life"</h1>
First of all, we must affirm that Teacher Li Chengru's views are very "correct" and there is nothing wrong with it.
But on the other hand, some of Li Chengru's views do have a strong personal aesthetic, but each person is different, and those who are similar to his aesthetic will only be a small part of it. Therefore, this program has become Li Chengru's personal "spit conference" from a certain angle, and it is not universal.
Teacher Li Chengru's evaluation of some film and television works is often mixed with personal preferences, and most of the good works he put forward are classic works from decades ago, and frankly, they have not kept pace with the times. I feel that Teacher Li Chengru should watch more excellent works in the world now, and perhaps the evaluation will be more accurate and fresh.
However, it is also said that Thirteen is not qualified to teach Teacher Li Chengru how to do it, just some personal understanding.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="37" > conclusion</h1>
Teacher Li Chengru's "Drama Confucian Life" Have you watched? Do you think that Teacher Li Chengru's views are too arbitrary? Feel free to chat in the comments section.