For some reason, the United States has long maintained the idea of "finding monsters to destroy". It is too heroic, like a fire, even if there is no "monster", it has to create its own monster.
Fascism during World War II, the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and terrorists in the early twenty-first century were all obstacles that the United States saw as an obstacle that it had to remove if it wanted "world peace (to uphold the international rules it had laid down).
The United States targets these countries and organizations either because they really threaten the existence of the United States, or because they are really vicious, and the reasons for the United States to confront them are all justified.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="2" > (i) to cut the plot, followed by the cut</h1>
Today, it is somewhat incomprehensible that the United States regards China as an "imaginary enemy." China neither preaches hegemonism nor pursues the interests of other countries.
But the United States stubbornly believes that China's development is a stumbling block. Over the past few years, in order to curb China's rise, the United States has racked its brains and directed itself to perform one "big drama" after another that harms others and harms itself, and China has also seen tricks and tricks, and has fought back and forth with this superpower.
The two sides have opened up a number of battlefields and carried out round after round of games. So, where is the main battlefield of the duel between China and the United States? The view was expressed that it should be at the negotiating table.
After all, there are huge common interests between China and the United States, one is prosperous and the other is lost. Only by calmly sitting down and talking is the ultimate meaning of resolving disputes.
Is this really the case?
At the very least, it is not anachronistic as it stands. First, the two sides are deadlocked, and the United States refuses to take the lead in bowing its head.
As we all know, the United States has always liked to look at other countries in a condescending manner, and it despises all countries except itself in its heart, and it is as confident as it is, how can it easily lower its head?
Moreover, it has already unfurled the banner of "America is back" and attracted a number of allies to follow. If you retreat at this time, won't you laugh at the people of the world?
For us, we will not voluntarily submit. The United States has been interfering in China's internal affairs, and it has also separated China's relations with neighboring countries and tried in vain to infringe on China's dignity.
Unless the United States promises to coexist peacefully with China thereafter, we will not be able to abandon development and stagnate in order to curry favor with the United States.
Second, most of this year's high-level meetings between China and the United States ended in displeasure. Earlier, in Anchorage, Alaska, when Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Director Yang Jiechi met with US Secretary of State Blinken and Security Adviser Sullivan, the ATTITUDE of the US side was arrogant and abnormal, smearing China from the very beginning, in a vain attempt to impose long-arm jurisdiction over us.
Director Yang Jiechi shouted angrily: "The United States is not qualified to speak to China condescendingly, and Chinese not eat this set." Dealing with China requires mutual respect. ”
Not long ago, US Deputy Secretary of State Sherman took the initiative to ask for a visit to China.
On the surface, she was gentle, but it was hard to hide her arrogance, and the White House even claimed that "we should negotiate with China based on strength and status."
Vice Foreign Minister Xie Feng responded: "The fundamental reason why Sino-US relations are currently at an impasse is that some people in the United States regard China as an imaginary enemy. China urges the US side to change this extremely erroneous thinking and extremely dangerous China policy. The so-called rules-based international order promoted by the United States is actually a family law gang of laws between the United States and a few Western countries, which is used to lock down and suppress other countries. ”
At the previous East Asia Summit, Blinken had begun to dictate China's Xinjiang and Hong Kong affairs. Foreign Minister Ling Wang Yi immediately applied for a second speech and said sharply: "You have died this heart!" ”
In summary, Sino-US relations have not reached an irreconcilable point, but neither side has found a suitable point, and there is no good basis for a meeting.
Now the time is not ripe, even if everyone is on the negotiating table again, they will not be able to discuss a good result if they push each other's interests back and forth.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="4" > (2) is a big move, no concessions? </h1>
So, will the main battlefield between China and the United States be in the vast Pacific Ocean? As a maritime power, the United States has always been delusional to borrow powerful military power to disrupt the maritime situation around China.
It is either conveying support to the Taiwan authorities or deploying troops in the South China Sea, and it has also encouraged Britain, Japan, Australia, France, Germany, and India to march to China's coastal waters to carry out provocative demonstrations against us.
Earlier, the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command announced that the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps are joining forces with British, Australian and Japanese forces to hold a global large-scale military exercise in the Indo-Pacific region.
Almost at the same time, the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps also announced another "2021 large-scale exercise", spanning 17 time zones, claiming to be the largest joint exercise in 40 years.
The goal of these two exercises is very clear, that is, to let China know that the United States is not defeated, whether it has the ability to stir up trouble in the Pacific, or whether it has the ability to prevent the People's Liberation Army from liberating Taiwan.
Not to be outdone, China immediately announced that it would hold exercises in the Bohai Strait and the northern part of the Yellow Sea, as well as nearly 100,000 square kilometers from Sanya to most of the Paracel Islands.
The one in the South China Sea was a multi-service cooperative confrontation exercise, with both the Air Force, the Navy and the Rocket Force, and it is likely that the DF missile will be test-fired.
At the same time, the exercises jointly organized by China and Russia are also in full swing in the Great Northwest. Suddenly, China and the United States can be described as a sword, and the slightest carelessness will trigger a protracted war.
However, the gladiatorial arena between China and the United States is not above the endless ocean. Because the United States knew as early as the previous confrontation in the South China Sea that China was determined to defend its national dignity and territorial sovereignty.
If it acts rashly, it will certainly invite an all-round attack from China. This is china's doorstep, and China will certainly be able to offset the quality advantage of the United States with its quantitative advantage.
Moreover, once a naval war breaks out, it will involve almost all the major countries in the world, and it will inevitably turn into a third world war.
The United States is well aware of the dangers of world war, and it also understands that the conflict between the two sides is far from this point, and it cannot easily press the war button.
There are broad common interests between China and the United States, and even if China wins the war, the United States will certainly be seriously hurt.
Moreover, the right to war is not in biden's hands alone, and he wants to do something wrong, and he must first ask Congress whether it agrees.
It is worth mentioning that many companies in the United States have begun to sign a joint letter complaining about their dissatisfaction with Biden and asking him to immediately sit down with China to negotiate.
As long as the United States does not act first and does not take the initiative to invade and occupy China's territory, we will not rush to attack.
Since a hot war cannot be fought, no matter how many military exercises are held in the Pacific, they will not constitute any substantial blow to each other.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="6" > (3) get more help, lose the way and help less</h1>
So, where is the main battlefield of the duel between China and the United States?
The real battlefield lies in having a strong heart in our hearts. Always remain humble and unfazed, pampered and unfazed. It can be extended to the war of public opinion, economic war, science and technology war, and the invincibility of the arms race.
Why? In this era of developed networks, short flat fast has become the mainstream. Many times, an article or a video can be read in less than a minute.
As a result, there is very little time left for the brain to think.
In order to earn traffic, many people often say some things that make people's blood boil at first glance, such as calling on everyone to treat them in the same way as people, that is, the United States slanders us, we slander it, anyway, it has no way; for example, when we see foreign journalists on the street, we obstruct their shooting, so as not to carry out false propaganda.
Because there is no time to think, people have these ideas deeply imprinted in their minds and are convinced of them.
Not long ago, when Deutsche Welle reporters were reporting on the floods in Henan, they were besieged by a group of men and women. This made the Western media, which was already eager to add guilt, suddenly find a handle to attack and slander China.
Originally, under their rendering, China was a bit "unbearable", so they even found an excuse, which is not exactly handing a knife to foreign forces?
In addition, many Western media engage in "anti-string" on Chinese platforms. Previously, some people hyped up that the flood in Henan was a meteorological war carried out by the United States, and some people who did not know it were indignant, and they wanted to step on the United States and ask the country to go to war with it.
In the end, it was found that these media outlets that issued challenging remarks were all the work of Western forces.
They watch us get angry and corrupt, and then send it to the extranet, and then add fuel to the fire to carry out false propaganda against China, saying that there is extremism and extreme xenophobic thinking in China, and many people think that saying some "just" words is patriotic, but in fact, it is not, it is just a trap of evil people.
Isn't it true that the United States is engaged in wolf tactics in an attempt to encircle China and is looking around for excuses to smear China?
Moreover, in the long run, we will think that foreign forces are the most vicious people, and then we will close ourselves off.
In this way, the United States does not need to isolate us, we will exclude ourselves. This emotional anger may seem patriotic, but it is deliberately guided.
As the saying goes: "The body is not afraid of the shadow oblique", the United States rumors about us, we argue one by one. Do not learn from the United States to spread rumors, smear or even attack other countries.
So-called animals can bite humans, and humans can bite animals?
Whatever happens should be viewed calmly, because anger can make us lose our minds. Only by calming down can we find a way to break the enemy. Only then can we think of how to confront the United States at the negotiating table.
Of course, there must be a warm-blooded heart for all kinds of stolen frames, but at the same time, we must not forget to be sober-minded.