20220210 - The Newly Discovered Forty-Six of the Xia Dynasty
Song Yaguang
[Affirmation] Since Western Sumerian archaeology preceded and has been strongly named, the series of studies on Chinese characters and cuneiform characters that may be closer have to rely on this "result". But just as the Old Testament is the logic of the Hebrew family tree, the ancient history of our ancestors in Chinese characters, historical books, and genealogies is an uncompromising Chinese heritage, and the author's effort is to discover and prove this truth.
As mentioned in the previous part, Larsa Larsa was a mane in Xia Shi, and was later given to his younger son by Han Hun and renamed "Ge".
The picture below shows the comparison of the Chinese character "Ge" and the Larsa Larsa cuneiform name disassembly combination.
(1) "Go" Oracle
(2) "Go" Jinwen A
(3) "Go" Jinwen B
(4) "Ge" small seal
【Instructions】
The Sumerian king table resembles local and county chronicles, while the ancient history of China is closer to the family history, which has gone through ups and downs but endlessly. Therefore, mutual reference can not only be mutually verifiable, but also more flavorful.
【Episcopy】
Chinese characters are likely to be derived from 1 to more cuneiform scripts (mainly extended expressions of long stripes) and then combined into independent, three-dimensional new hieroglyphs. The existence of different strokes or structures in the same Chinese character A, Gold, Seal, and Complexity should be due to the differences caused by the ancient people who created the characters on the prototype of the cuneiform script in different eras, different perspectives, different imaginations, and different trade-off states, and the prototype is still unique and unified, just like the needle of the sea god, which plays the role of the rule. Of course, it may also be related to the changes in the old and new cuneiform scripts, for example, the stroke connotations of the seal book are particularly similar to the new cuneiform script (so that Qin Shi Huang, who doubted the unified script, must have a whole set of templates in his hands).
Another surprising phenomenon is that the same or a group of cuneiform prototypes can also be combined in different combinations to deduce N different Chinese characters, without exclusivity, mainly depending on the specific connection of strokes and structures, which is why the author judges that there is almost no root in the conversion of cuneiform into Chinese characters, and it is also extremely difficult. Fortunately, the records of Chinese history contain too much information to point out the direction for future generations, and it is impossible to compare them without results.
Moreover, the ancient Chinese characters and cuneiform scripts are all extremely precious, not possessed by the general public, and must be the exclusive use of gods, kings, princes, generals, xiangs and their families, resulting in their surnames, names, as well as fiefs, cities, heirs, etc. There is a close relationship with the ancestral source, and even great achievements, stories, and nicknames are also included. The Chinese ancestral tradition determines the great status of ancestral names, so it is absolutely true that his cuneiform name is dismantled and combined into new Chinese characters by as many descendants as possible. This is the eternal flesh-and-blood connection, and it is also the basis that the author likes to use as evidence.
Logically, Chinese characters that are disassembled and combined from cuneiform characters can be affirmed either for chinese characters that were innovative in ancient times, or for being highly similar to the recognized Chinese characters that already existed at that time (although they may have different origins). But for those of us who, thousands of years later, imitate the ancients of the word with reverse thinking reasoning, we actually contain the meaning of evidence. If this assumption and judgment are true, it can also be disproved that history is also inevitable.