laitimes

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

author:Xuzhou Watch Homeland

In the psychological book "The Ragged Crowd: A Study of Mass Psychology", Le Pen expounds the characteristics of the group and the group psychology, pointing out that when the individual is an isolated individual, he has his own distinct individual characteristics, and when the person is integrated into the group, all his personality will be overwhelmed by the group, and his thoughts will immediately be replaced by the group's thoughts. And when a group exists, it has the characteristics of emotion, no objection, low IQ and so on. I want to mention the rabble-rousers so, because I found some problems from the public opinion of the "Eight Children" family.

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" home has aroused widespread concern from all walks of life, and the limelight has approached hot topics such as the Spring Festival and the Winter Olympics. Feng County and Xuzhou have released information three times and reported on the relevant situation. But the public opinion is still running at a high level, the whole network is involved, and everyone wants to interject. But do we ask ourselves: Apart from following the trend, do you have the ability to think independently about the following ten key questions?

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

From the perspective of ordinary netizens alone, the easiest way is to communicate with Yang Mouxia or her husband Dong Moumin and ask questions. However, from the multiple videos filmed by "Xuzhou YixiuGe", Yang Mouxia seems to be able to understand some of the words we say, but the language of the response is difficult to understand. Judging from the content of the three circulars, Yang Mouxia was taken in by Dong Moumin's late father, and Dong Moumin was not very helpful in finding out yang Mouxia's situation.

The most convenient and simple method does not work, then it can only visit the people in the know around the investigation. However, judging from the notification, the official did not mention the content of "learned from the insider", and it can be guessed that this method is also not feasible. However, it is not so easy to verify that this method does not work. The author has consulted on the population of Dongjiaji Village, which is said to have a population of more than 2,000 people, which does not include neighboring villages, which is time-consuming and laborious.

According to the content of the circular, we know that the investigation team (the author believes that this investigation team should be the police) finally found the humble clue of "Yagu Village, Fugong County, Yunnan Province" by consulting the marriage registration application materials of Dong Moumin and Yang Mouxia. It was also this clue that the police investigated and visited a number of townships around the center of Yagu Village in Fugong County, checked the household registration book, and finally determined the important information of Yang Mouxia's Xiaohuamei. In view of this, the author would like to elaborate through two data: the distance from Feng County to Fugong is more than 2800 kilometers (this distance is still very surprising to the author) The author has a Yunnan classmate at university, he once said that every time he goes home he has to pour three kinds of cars: trains, cars, trampolines, a single trip without rest for at least one day and one night, which shows that it is not easy to drive in terms of transportation alone; according to Baidu Encyclopedia, in 2009, only one village in Yagu Village has 469 households and a rural population of 2020 (remember, this is only Yagu Village, How many people there are in the surrounding townships, the author did not calculate it carefully). The Fengxian incident occurred on the eve of the Spring Festival in the Year of the Tiger, and I don't know how many public security policemen dragged a tired body to Yunnan more than 5,000 miles away under the brilliant fireworks of the New Year in Wanjia, and together with the local police in Yunnan, one family knocked on the door of the house immersed in the joy of the New Year and asked them if they knew Yang Mouxia. The author does not want to praise anyone, just want to say, they are not far away from home is to return Yang Mouxia a statement? I believe that they must have exhausted all means and work to get the fact that they are professionally considered to be the closest to the truth.

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

In response to the third notice, there are many controversies about the questioning of "Xiaohuamei" as a name, and some netizens feel that there is no "Xiao" surname according to their own cognition. I think the locals have the most say in this issue.

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

I found a comment from a local netizen on the Internet: "Fugong County belongs to the Nujiang Prefecture Lisu Autonomous Prefecture, some of the authentic Lisu people here do not have surnames, many of the older generation of people only have Lisu names Transliterated into Chinese will be strange, mostly A XX, small XX is the same." I have friends and classmates who don't have a surname, and my parents' friends who have no surname after going to school have a name with a surname."

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

The root cause of netizens' doubts is nothing more than a comparative photo of Yang Mouxia and Li Ying, so the various "immortals" have used all their strength to forcibly "merge the two into one".

First of all, on January 30, when Feng County issued its second notice, it was clear that "in November 2020, the public security organs entered Yang Mouxia's DNA into the abducted/missing child information system and the DNA database for comparison, and so far there is no comparison of relatives information in China." On the other hand, Li Ying's parents are eager to find their daughters, they will never give up such an important way to find relatives, and the DNA of the two should have been stored in the library. The mismatch has largely shown that Li Ying is not Yang Mouxia. Second, on February 7, The Paper reported that Li Ying's mother admitted that she had previously contacted the Sichuan police and conducted DNA comparisons, but did not find DNA similar to Li Ying. It can be said that It has become a fact that Yang Mouxia is not Li Ying. Third, although Xuzhou's third release did not respond to the question of "whether Yang Mouxia is Li Ying", it has been clear that Yang Mouxia's identity is a "small flower plum" of an ethnic minority in Yunnan, indicating that this problem has been rejected by the Xuzhou and Sichuan police. If there are still people who question this, then there is only one reason, that is, deliberately "mixing water".

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

Hu Xijin, former editor-in-chief of the Global Times and internet big V, released information at 19:19 on February 8, and he personally believed that the "Sang Moumou" in the Xuzhou report was a human trafficker. The author believes that whether Yang Mouxia was abducted or sold should also rely on the detailed investigation of the public security department. Many people on the Internet believe that as long as the transaction involving money is abduction, this is not right, "abduction" in "abduction" is the meaning of deception, that is, subjective intention. Every era has the limitations of each era, this is a historical law, we can't use the 2022 standard to measure the things of the 8090s, that will be outrageous. Spending money to buy a wife is a historical reality, so what about today's sky-high bride price? Does it belong to buying a wife? Is Xiaohuamei looking for her in-laws or being trafficked? It should be measured by the law, not by personal feelings.

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

But one thing is undeniable, whether at the national level or the public security organs, they have always been resolute in their attitude to combating human trafficking, that is, "zero tolerance". This kind of case is highly hidden, and they will use a lot of police and material resources to deal with it, and some cases even work hard for more than ten years. What the hell are you saying they are doing? Or is it for the reunion of individual families? Moreover, as the Criminal Law of the mainland continues to intensify its criminal crackdown on crimes such as abducting and trafficking in women and children and bribing abducted women and children, especially the in-depth development of the special struggle against organized crime and evil forces, some areas have basically disappeared in recent years.

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

This problem has always been a problem that many netizens are very concerned about. According to the notice issued by Xuzhou, experts at both the city and county levels consulted Yang Mouxia's schizophrenia and implemented treatment, and his mental condition tended to be stable. Back to the history of the disease, the report said that after "Xiaohuamei" returned to Yagu Village in 1996 from divorce, it has shown abnormal speech and behavior, and the author has also specifically learned about schizophrenia, which is a multifactorial disease, including genetic factors, somatic biological factors, personality characteristics, environmental and psychosocial factors and other multiple influences, most of the patients have the age of illness from 15 to 25 years old, and there will be violence and beatings when it is serious. Therefore, in order to determine when Yang Mouxia got this disease, it is difficult or impossible to determine.

In addition, Yang Mouxia's tooth loss problem has always been concerned by netizens, and even the remarks of "teeth being extracted" have appeared repeatedly. In the notification, the official made it clear that "Yang Mouxia's tooth loss is caused by severe periodontal disease." Some netizens still don't want to believe it. To this end, the author specifically checked the Tencent Medical Code, which records that severe periodontal disease will cause teeth to be displaced, loose or even fall out. The causes of periodontal disease are mainly poor lifestyle, such as not paying attention to oral hygiene, not removing food incarceration between teeth in time or brushing methods are not standardized enough, and bacterial metabolites deposited on teeth and food residues have not been effectively removed. It is conceivable that Yang Mouxia, as a mental disorder patient, cannot pay attention to oral hygiene, and may even not brush his teeth for a long time, and his dental health really cannot be talked about.

There are also netizens who say that the tip of Yang Mouxia's tongue has been cut. What a frightening and vicious nonsense. In the video of CCTV News on February 8, the process of Yang Mouxia's dialogue with the doctor was filmed. In addition, in a video that has been widely disseminated on the Internet, I believe that everyone has seen the footage of Yang Mouxia who has been talking and heard her gushing voice.

Whether the body surface is injured, this problem is actually I also particularly want to explore, but from the video exposed on the Internet, Yang Mouxia's face is not obvious trauma, as for whether there is a body, this we are not good guess, fortunately in the briefing said that Yang Mouxia's other health indicators are normal, which shows that her body is not a big problem, netizens can rest assured.

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

"8 children" has always been the focus of attention of netizens, especially "whether Dong Yang is born personally" has been speculated by many netizens, and even created a shameless rumor that "father and son have sex with him". In the third briefing, the official finally gave the real hammer conclusion: "After DNA identification by the judicial laboratory of Nanjing Medical University, the eight children and Dong Moumin and Yang Mouxia are in line with the biological parent-child relationship."

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

According to the two circulars issued by Feng County: "In August 1998, Dong and Yang received a license to marry. "When registering a marriage, the staff of the township civil affairs office did not strictly verify their identity information", as to whether the marriage procedure is valid, this issue needs to be interpreted by professionals.

This also involves a hukou problem, the author specifically looked for the staff related to the hukou management to carefully inquire and understand, Jiangsu Province once had the "Implementation Opinions on Solving the Problem of Registration of Persons Without Hukou", Xuzhou City also has the "Regulations on the Administration of Permanent Household Registration", all of which make it clear that "due to intellectual disabilities or deafness and illiteracy, unable to say the address of origin, true identity of the non-hukou personnel, after collecting basic information and DNA comparison in the database of missing persons to eliminate problems such as abduction and trafficking, duplicate household registration, etc., they should apply for hukou settlement." The official notice also shows that the public security organs have conducted DNA comparison in 2020, and so far they may not be related to each other. It is certain that Yang Mouxia's settlement work is a normal procedure, as for the origin of the name "Yang Mouxia", the author believes that it should be proposed by Dong Moumin himself.

Dong Mouminchao gave birth to 8 children in serious violation of the family planning policy, but there are still 7 children who have applied for a minimum guarantee and received government assistance, whether they meet the regulations. The author believes that "the minimum guarantee is not a reward, but a subsidy for difficulties." "There are two different legal relationships between the super birth and the minimum guarantee, and Dong Moumin's super birth violates the laws and policies of family planning and should be punished by the family planning department; but Dong Moumin's family enjoys the minimum guarantee treatment, and the civil affairs department provides assistance to eligible families and personnel according to regulations." Whether the recipient has violated the law is not within the scope of the civil affairs department's review. So, does Dong Moumin's family meet the conditions of the minimum guarantee? The Mainland's Interim Measures for Social Assistance stipulate that "the social assistance system adheres to the bottom line, rescues emergencies, and is sustainable." "The state shall grant the minimum subsistence guarantee to families whose per capita income of family members living together is lower than the local minimum subsistence guarantee standard and who meet the provisions of the local minimum subsistence guarantee family property status." From this point of view, the per capita income standard of Dong Moumin's family members does not meet the minimum guarantee conditions, and the civil affairs department should of course give the minimum guarantee.

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

The specific people suspected of committing crimes should have a basic definition in their minds. Dong Moumin has no doubt that the second and third official circulars have made it clear that "Dong Moumin's behavior is suspected of violating the law" and "the public security organs have launched an investigation into whether Dong Moumin is suspected of violating the law and committing crimes." For Dong Moumin, we just need to wait for the results of the investigation. Another possibility is Sang, from three notices, netizens have questioned Sang's behavior, and the notice is frank and there is a follow-up investigation. According to the Internet V@ Lonely Smoke Twilight Cicada revealed at 17:00 on February 9: "Sang, criminal detention."

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

Which government personnel will be dealt with is also the result of netizens' concern. Throughout the incident, the relevant functional departments have exposed more or less problems. For example, when Dong and Yang applied for a marriage license, the town government staff did not strictly verify Yang's identity. This staff member is certainly a problem of dereliction of duty. For example, Dong and Yang have overborn, and the functional departments for family planning work have failed to take effective measures, and naturally there are problems of dereliction of duty and dereliction of duty. For example, since 1998, Yang Mouxia has lived with Dong Moumin, and mental problems have persisted, and the failure of the local women's federation, health and family planning departments and village committees to take timely rescue work is also a certain problem of dereliction of duty. Of course, the relevant leading cadres at the local town and county levels in Feng County also naturally have negligence in their duties of negligence and negligence. In this way, the departments involved in this incident and the personnel who need to deal with it should be quite a few.

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

In the era when traffic is king, interest is always the biggest driving force. Reviewing this public opinion incident, the author believes that this is the story of an unsuccessful Internet celebrity (it should be multiple Internet celebrities) hype that aroused the attention of the whole people.

The first is Dong Moumin. By looking at the videos of his Douyin and Kuaishou accounts, it can be judged that since December last year, Dong Moumin, in order to obtain social help and economic benefits, has taken short videos with the theme of raising 8 children and living difficulties in his family, and uploaded them to the Douyin platform, bo sympathy, donations, and fans to earn money. In fact, Dong Moumin did achieve the effect, growing more than 50,000 fans in a short period of time. The author judges from the perspective of a netizen that this Dong will definitely obtain benefits through the attention, pity and donations of netizens, and even become a capable person who made the surrounding neighbors "hot-eyed" at that time.

The second is "Xuzhou Yixiu Brother". This is more of a rub heat, a typical example of rising fans and making money. He exposed Yang Mouxia in the name of doing public welfare and caring for poor people, and also said in the live broadcast room that "I am not for the police, otherwise what should the children do, I just want enthusiastic netizens to see and give a little more care", it is really grandiose, if you really find yang Mouxia being abused, he should call the police at the first time, rather than live broadcasting to earn eyeballs in another place.

There are also wedding celebrants and decoration company owners, these two "receiving advertisements" videos were actually filmed before the public opinion occurred. In the video, Dong Moumin has also been thanking the two for their care and help to him, but it is undeniable that the two helped Dong Moumin to officially do what they like and take what they need for these two "thanks" videos.

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

The author believes that in general, this event contains too many "explosive points" that can be hyped, and too much space that can make people's brains make up.

From the perspective of public opinion guidance: when encountering public opinion, timely release through official public opinion is the most effective method of public opinion guidance, and it can often solve the problem with a hammer. However, the three official briefings of this public opinion cannot be called successful guidance. The reasons for this are mainly reflected in two aspects: inconsistencies, response priorities and netizen expectations are not coupled. The first notice was issued at 18:47 on January 28, when public opinion has been running at a high level on the Internet for more than 10 hours, although it is more timely, but because the notice did not focus on the focus of netizens, nor did it elaborate on the work carried out, not only did not lift the doubts of the majority of netizens, but also attracted questions from all sides. At 23:46 on the evening of January 30, Feng County issued a second circular. The circular still does not face the core of the problem, and does not solve the focus issues such as the identity of the woman, whether she is abducted, whether she is suspected of rape, and whether she has been abused, and public opinion does not buy it. At 22:50 on February 7, Xuzhou issued three notices, because Yang Mouxia was Xiao Moumei, Dong Moumin, how to punish, and Sang Mou's identity was unclear, the focus of netizens continued to expand, and public opinion once again ushered in large fluctuations.

From the perspective of social aspects and false information control: rumors should be the root cause of the role of rumors in this public opinion. Since the outbreak of public opinion on January 28, online rumors such as "tooth extraction", "cutting the tip of the tongue", "sex slaves", "father and son rape", "in addition to eight children and other children were abandoned", "receiving advertisements" and other online rumors have continuously stimulated the anger of netizens and reduced the rational voice of the people. Although the three circulars responded to the relevant rumors, the expression method of only saying the result and not talking about the process obviously did not fully answer the rumors and the focus of netizens, and the hostility of netizens continued to rise with the help of false information such as rumors, driving the heat of public opinion discussion to be difficult to dissipate, and public opinion has always been running at a high level. Those so-called "defenders" who think they are wise have already completed the public opinion trial through "brain supplementation." There is no going to look closely at the official briefing. For example, before the release of the third circular, it has been learned that the Xuzhou release will issue a notice, and it takes 2-3 minutes to read the 800-word circular, but after only 1 minute, there are nearly a thousand critical posts. It's safe to say that they didn't even look at it and started spraying. In fact, a lot of spray content has already been said in the briefing.

From the perspective of handling according to law: no matter what kind of public opinion storm, what netizens want is nothing more than fairness and attitude. It can be said that the government and the police handle it according to law as the intersection that everyone pursues. In this incident, the author believes that the government and the police must be carrying out investigations day and night, hoping to string together the clues scattered for decades to form a rigorous closed-loop chain of evidence. In the previous few questions, the author has already assessed the difficulty of this public opinion survey, and it can be said that it is impossible to express the completeness with a "difficult" word. However, in the face of the surging storm of public opinion, the government can only inform the public of the evidence in hand, after all, these evidence has not yet formed a complete evidence chain, and the ability to resist netizens' questioning will inevitably be reduced.

Postscript

The public opinion of the "Eight Children" house is raging, and these ten questions need to be considered

This public opinion is one of the most complex public opinions that the author has deeply understood, and it is also one of the most influential public opinion events. While arousing the attention of the whole network, it will inevitably arouse the great attention of functional departments at all levels, and it can be said that it is inevitable to exhaust all means to find out the facts and deal with them in accordance with laws and regulations. Although the three official releases were restricted by various conditions and did not fully respond to the concerns of netizens, they also let us see from another aspect that the attitude of the local government to sensitive public opinion is a positive response, after all, we have seen multiple rounds of interaction between the government and netizens. Although there are conflicts and collisions in the process of interaction, the direction of the efforts of the government and netizens is consistent, and this concerted effort will undoubtedly promote similar incidents to be handled in accordance with laws and regulations.

In the midst of the clamor,

We're just going to follow the trend and interject.

The ability to think independently should be maintained!

Read on