For pros, different people will have different words.
As an old S3 antique, I have seen and heard the public opinion storms of some professional players, the set of debates that dusk believers and peak support, the fanatical genes of the whole people to create gods, and the column of shame that is difficult to read.
Are they, in our eyes, honorable or humble?
Director
Nowadays, I am no stranger to the indiscriminate bombardment of UZI, which happened once in the early years of the factory manager, and I am not a so-called reasonable guest, but a participant.
EDG's eight-strong spell puts the focal point in front of the stage, and countless people begin to dig into his history and put it under the microscope of the crowd.
What radicals need is black history, from personal qualities to teammate relationships to psychological growth, all-round attack;
The moderates retort that when the tigers in the three populations become the consensus, even if you are Wu Song, you are powerless.
When the two factions collide with each other, they produce extreme factions, extremes to smear or extreme to maintain, and there are many people from different camps who are confused and used to confuse the audition.
But all of this is good for the rhythmists, they can state the facts, they can exaggerate, no matter what, they can usher in a debate between the two sides, and they can eat a lot without having to go down.
Coincidentally, I became a self-proclaimed rational radical, learning about the fish dead net breaking, depression knife method, Muay Thai warning, zhongdan has little to do with many other allusions, spontaneously searching the whole network for his black history, in order to store my anger and vocabulary.
But when it comes to the real line I hesitate, can I spray the opposite side, do I know him well enough, why do I get angry or even insult to others because of an outsider who may not intersect?
Me, what do you want?
I hope that someone who shares my views and accuses him with me;
I hope that I can stand on the commanding heights and despise his moral standards;
I hope that I can become a temporary opinion leader on the web;
My purpose is equally impure, they exist more or less in my actions and consciousness, but outsiders cannot see it, they cannot judge my nobility and inferiority, and the Internet has become my best shield and cover.
Old thief
Perhaps some players remember Sima Lao Thief, a player who was set up as an AD player with a paralyzed face, a cold but a good professional attitude in the early years.
Influenced by various wonderful collections such as Annihilation and Sima Lao Ember, I decided to justify his name and wrote an article titled "Old Ji Fu Fu Qi Can Be Bullied, Determined to Be a Thief", full of self-touching groaning genre.
Most of the comments at the bottom are approval and praise, so that my sense of superiority gradually exploded, until I encountered a shocking sentence - the author does not know the old thief very well, go to see his game and compare with other AD players, I really can't understand how to set up data and will not be embarrassed here.
Of course, I was not convinced, and I looked for him to theorize, and as a result, he was like a few AD players in the top of the row, from intuitive data to personal style to situation understanding, leaving me dumbfounded. He did not deny the old thief's efforts and attitude, but killing and insulting are the same as the fast knives that hurt people.
What was my intention?
The old thief symbolizes some of the under-famous professional players, who are conscientious but no one has discovered, and outsiders do not understand their true strength.
I thought I was a discerning Bole, and what I wanted to prove was nothing more than a broader and broader vision than the average player, and more forward-looking.
At the end of the day, I only glimpsed it, and I rushed to prove myself correct and show the gap between myself and others.
I am nothing more than an insignificant individual dominated by emotions, which exposes my ostentatiousness, impulsiveness and complacency, as well as my pale weakness in logic and fact.
UZI
The greatest similarity between religion and humanism is that both believe in God, who is no longer shackled by the shortcomings of human nature, who is noble;
But religious belief is a foreign object, using causality to restrain itself; humanism wants such a person to become a god, and they constantly elect god-chosen people and constantly eliminate useless people.
In a very small way, the same is true of the god-making movement in the LOL community.
Perhaps, marketing and rice circles are more appropriate, and the biggest drawback of this model is not vulgar quarrels, but black and white thinking, and no one can be defined purely as good or bad.
The hidden danger is that all differences will be replaced by opposites, and aggression will sweep the battlefield to become the main tone.
You don't need to come up with opinions, you just need to express disgust;
You don't need to give factual evidence to oppose it, you just need to release the attack signal.
Don't worry, there's always a hat for you.
As an ordinary person, I don't want to persuade everyone to stay sane, just grasp the scale: the experience of high-intensity surfing has taught me that if you want to stay out of the matter and don't have to make points, silence is the truth.
In the process of silence, we can look at them more completely and realize the difference between reality and surfing.
Pros, like countless passers-by we've met, have flaws and strengths, only to be amplified infinitely in the spotlight of the network, with each of them attaching their own criteria to them.
But are they irreplaceable in your life and are they worth consuming enough emotions and energy?
Because of selfishness, I have no time to take care of others.