Is the baby's genus based on the first day of the Chinese New Year, or is it bounded by lichun?
The cousin and daughter-in-law gave birth to a baby at the beginning of the New Year, and the original due date was on the 26th of the Waxing Moon, but she did not expect the baby to be delayed.
The uncle's family was happy to come to the door, and they were all happy to close their mouths.
My cousin said that my baby really chooses the time, that is, to be a tiger baby.
But the uncle and cousin disagreed about the baby's affiliation. Uncle said that the baby should still belong to the cow, because the time has not yet arrived, the beginning of this year's fourth spring!
Whether the baby born on the first day of the Chinese New Year this year belongs to the cow or the tiger is really a more tangled question.
To this end, I also checked it deliberately, and there are those who support the standard of the Chinese New Year's Day as the zodiac sign, and there are also those who support the beginning of Lichun.
[Rose] supports the First Day of the Chinese New Year:
Some folklore experts believe that:
The Spring Festival is the beginning of the Lunar New Year and the beginning of the Lunar Zodiac Year, and the genus should naturally be counted from the beginning of the first lunar month.
The earliest record of calculating the zodiac sign by the lunar new year (the first day of the Lunar New Year) appeared in the Northern Song Dynasty, and many people now agree with this algorithm.
[Rose] supports Li Chun's:
The zodiac sign's method of taking Lichun as the standard began in the Shang zhou era.
At present, folklore such as the yellow calendar, traditional numerology, and divination all use "Lichun" as the basis for the calculation of the zodiac.
For the baby's genus, do you support the first day of the Chinese New Year, or do you support Lichun?
#Parent-child happy new year# (image from the Internet)
