laitimes

It's really not for face, why is it that buying an iPhone 13 is actually more economical?

Now choose mobile phones, everyone is more and more rational, will not blindly rush to the brand factor to pick products, but look at practicality and quality, choose to suit themselves. Like most consumers now, will they buy an iPhone because of face? Of course not, easy to use, smooth enough is king! Or in other words, "A machine can be used for 4 to 5 years, is it not fragrant?" ”

It's really not for face, why is it that buying an iPhone 13 is actually more economical?

Let's start with an economic account

If it is used as the main equipment, the performance and practicality of the selected mobile phone can not be too bad, so in comparison, starting a 3,000 yuan Android function can persist for about 2 years, even if the life is maximized, after the mobile phone appears stuck, it will continue to be used, and it is nothing more than a 3-year time limit.

Of course, this is the best ideal situation. In fact, the maximum age of an Android machine that most people use is mostly within 2 years. According to the conversion frequency of such a change, it is better to spend two or three thousand to buy an Android machine than to spend nearly 6,000 to buy an iPhone 13 for 4 to 5 years.

It's really not for face, why is it that buying an iPhone 13 is actually more economical?

If you think about performance, the iPhone 13 is really expensive

In addition to the price factor, the iPhone 13 does perform better than many Android machines in terms of performance. It's powered by the industry's most powerful A15 processor chip and iSO 15 system, delivering smooth performance ahead of other products in its price range. In particular, the iOS system comes with a completely closed software ecosystem, the security factor is higher, it is not easy to lose information or key data, and the operation experience is more humane, and there are many unique commercial exclusive APPS in the software store.

It's really not for face, why is it that buying an iPhone 13 is actually more economical?

In addition, the Samsung custom OLED screen display effect equipped with the iPhone13 is excellent, and it also has a fairly stable performance in terms of photography and battery life, which can meet the needs of consumers in a balanced manner. Purely from the perspective of performance, the iPhone 13 has been a prerequisite for a machine for 5 years.

It's really not for face, why is it that buying an iPhone 13 is actually more economical?

The excellent performance of the machine fundamentally determines the age of the machine, which is why it is actually more economical to start an iPhone 13. Especially in the face of today's big data, many people do not like to change the machine frequently, because after the change, the information such as each account must be resynchronized. Not only that, but if it is a cross-brand change, it will also take some time to adapt to the new system.

It's really not for face, why is it that buying an iPhone 13 is actually more economical?

High value retention, there will be no sharp price reduction on third-party platforms

Judging from the price of iPhones in recent years, the price fluctuation trend is very stable, and there will be no rapid price reduction in a short period of time. We can look at the price of the iPhone 11, after 3 years, the price of the machine is still around 4,000. The Xiaomi Mi 9 and vivo X50 series in the same year have completely lost the opportunity to compete with the current new products.

It's really not for face, why is it that buying an iPhone 13 is actually more economical?

Recommended reference

If you are rushing to durability to buy a machine, at present, the iPhone 13 is indeed a good choice, whether it is performance or value retention, it is more stable than other Android machines at the same price. In this regard, how do you think that "buying an iPhone 13 is actually more economical"?

Read on