Previously, there was a video of teachers wearing Hanfu to give students lessons, which caused heated discussion, and netizens were still discussing whether wearing Hanfu would affect whether it would be good or not. In the past few days, a picture of a female teacher of a post-95 primary school wearing a JK uniform to give lessons to students has been circulated on the Internet.
Whether or not any teachers wear JK uniforms to class, this matter has caused heated discussion. In addition to people's dissatisfaction with teachers wearing strange clothes to class, there are also changes brought about by the gradual movement of young people in the new era to traditional positions.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="6" >What is a JK uniform? </h1>
JK is a Japanese Internet buzzword that refers to female high school students, and JK uniform refers to the uniform worn by female high school students. It is very popular in the cultural circle of Young people in Japan, especially in the circle of two-dimensional culture, which represents a youthful attribute.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="26" > can female teachers wear JK uniforms to class? </h1>
The post-95 young people themselves do pay attention to personality, and they have indeed reached the age of participation in the work.
The so-called empty wind may not be without a cause. If you look at the above conditions, a young female teacher after 95 may indeed wear JK to school. However, there is also the most important fact that all teachers have special requirements for dressing in class.
For example, female teachers cannot wear backless clothes, suspender suits, and miniskirts. Obviously, the skirt of the JK uniform can already be regarded as a superskirt in the teaching profession. Taking a step back, no matter from what aspect, JK clothing can only be regarded as a clothing that is not yet well received by the public in a small circle.
Then asked if the teacher could wear the JK uniform itself, indicating that the matter was very controversial. If there are really female teachers dressed in this way to go to class, then the focus of the course must be led from the class itself to other directions, which is harmful to the teaching process.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="27" >Why do teachers need to dress as required? </h1>
Because people must have professionalism, professional attitude, and professional ethics. It's normal for people in different industries to be dressed in a regulated manner when working, right? Not to mention the doctor's white coat and the like, people go out to dinner on a slightly formal occasion, I am afraid that they do not want to wear anything, right?
Teachers are the guides of "preaching, teaching, and solving puzzles", and the education of students is not only in knowledge, but also in moral and behavioral demonstration. This "watch" of being a teacher's watch not only refers to setting an example for students, but also has requirements in terms of wearing instruments.
Therefore, teachers cannot wear JK uniforms to class now, on the one hand, because society has higher standards, requirements and expectations for the profession of teachers, and on the other hand, because the cultural meaning represented by the JK uniform itself is not accepted by most people.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="28" > a conflict of ideas</h1>
Now the parents of primary and secondary school students are mostly post-80s and post-90s, there is no doubt that the JK uniform is one of the memories of their teenagers, whether it is a sailor moon or something else, many memories will appear in the JK uniform. As the post-95s gradually entered the workplace and mastered more right to speak, some post-95 teachers believe that wearing the JK uniform itself is only to narrow the distance with the students while also showing their youthful colors.
But many young parents disagreed, the teacher wore a JK uniform in class, and the student did not all see the teacher go. In fact, it is not wrong to think about it this way, so there will be a requirement for teachers to dress.
But in the 1980s, young people carrying radios, flared pants and toad mirrors, breaking dance, had more open relationships than the older generation. At that time, they were ostracized by the mainstream of society, and they were probably the first generation to be regarded as the "Beat". Now, they are healthy and confident uncles and aunts in various squares, except for a few old people who are still wearing sunglasses despite the fact that they have bad eyes, those radios have become high-power amplifiers, and flared pants have become similar exercise clothes and dance costumes. I don't think many people are criticizing their retirement!
Judging from this change of concept, people's attitudes toward the "non-mainstream" behavior of different people are different.
So there is no need to be harsh and anxious, as long as the post-95 teacher wears JK with the intention of highlighting her youth, in order to narrow the distance with students so as to better teach, and in the future, when the society sees that they can complete their education well, they may give understanding and support.
However, at present, the teacher wears a JK uniform to class, and I still feel that it is inappropriate, if it is accepted by society in the future, it is another story. But at the moment, I hope that some of the behaviors of some teachers will not affect the students. Although dressing is free, the teacher should pay more attention to the occasion, after all, it is in class.
Post-95 female teachers wear JK uniforms to class, which has aroused heated discussion
Can female teachers wear JK uniforms to class?
For more exciting content, come and follow text thinking