<h1 class = "pgc-h-arrow-right" > Point General Stage No. 59: Rivaldo's level is slightly greater than Zidane's, honor is not inferior to Zidane's, his technology is better, he is underrated, is it true? </h1>
Marseille Boomerang PK Upside Down Golden Hook! Seeing some fans and friends shouting injustice for Rivaldo, I personally feel that Rivaldo is indeed a low-key power star, but I do not agree with the so-called "Rivaldo's strength is stronger than Zidane".
Admittedly, Brazilian genius Rivaldo was also the Winner of the Ballon d'Or and World Footballer of the Year.
The left winger or the "demon knife" of the front waist, the left foot in situ technique is very good, breakthrough, long-range shooting and set-piece techniques are excellent, can use the ball sense and imagination to complete the shooting method such as sticking to the ground or hanging the golden hook upside down, is the strongest midfielder of that era.
Rivaldo's limelight at Barca is stronger than Figo, Rivaldo has completed 5 goals and 4 assists in the 2002 World Cup, and some people say that Rivaldo is more like the "true core" of Brazil's World Cup winning the World Cup than Ronaldo.
Even if these claims were true, we wouldn't dare say that Rivaldo must be stronger than Zidane, right?
Unlike Rivaldo, who is good at direct scoring, French midfield master Zidane is more accustomed to organizing and scheduling through stoppage, ball control, dribbling and passing in the front waist position, controlling the rhythm of his own attack
Zidane's ball sense is delicate, the style of the ball is elegant, the physical fitness is also against the sky, and there can be key performances at key moments.
You say Rivaldo is the Ballon d'Or winner and the World Footballer of the Year winner, and Zidane is still "UEFA Player of 50 Years".
Of course, you can also question the gold content of this award, I can only say that Zidane and Rivaldo also have World Cup champions in hand, but Zidane's stability is much stronger than Rivaldo.'s.
Except for 1999, when Rivaldo was stronger, other years were basically Zidane stronger.
Put it this way, Rivaldo's peak height is the same as Zidane's, but his peak period is average in length, and after the age of 30, he has no place in the mainstream giants.
Rivaldo is a "demon knife" that is not good at times, and Zidane is a master and more stable.
Rivaldo scored more efficiently and Zidane was more organized, with the two men's usual foot techniques similar, but Zidane's backsfoot and headers were both stronger.
Overall, I think Zidane is better than Rivaldo.
Who do you think is stronger, Zidane and Rivaldo? Welcome to discuss together.