No remorse! Without changing the Hong Kong independence field, Liang Tianqi, a prisoner released from Hong Kong, does not have the conditions for rehabilitation, and must still be supervised

After Hong Kong anti-China and chaotic Hong Kong elements were arrested for various criminal offenses, including committing crimes against the "Hong Kong National Security Law," the first reaction of "Yellow Silk" public opinion was that these arrested people were all suffering because of "striving for democracy and freedom." What is the crime? They will attack "tyranny and suppression", which is of course useless, but only exposes that they will make a comeback at every opportunity in the future. Their second reaction was to be tolerant of those who had been caught and not to beat up the water dogs.

Next, when these Hong Kong rioters are released from prison, the "yellow silk" public opinion will vigorously publicize the need to give these people "resurgence opportunities and space", to accept them in the society, if they are students, then the government should help them "re-enter the campus". A few days ago, when Leung Tin-chi, a "Hong Kong independence radical" who had been imprisoned for 6 years in the Mong Kok riots, was released from prison, Guan Haoming, a member of the Legislative Council with a religious background, expressed compassion for the people of heaven and compassion, and hoped that society would be fair to the young people who had been imprisoned and sentenced, give space to the survivors, and not continue to target them; Guan Haoming also cried out for Liang Tianqi, saying that he "still kept talking about the past, and it seems that it is not fair to the rehabilitated people."

We don't know whether the deputies were entrusted by Liang Tianqi or whether they "spoke out with righteousness" and wanted to "get justice" for Liang Tianqi? In short, this congressman's move is very abrupt and nonsensical! Some people have denounced him: Leung's "Hong Kong independence" stance has not changed, nor has the complexity of international relations changed; if it had been in the British years of Hong Kong, how would the Political Department have dealt with Leung Tin-chi, a prisoner who openly advocated "Hong Kong independence"?

Common sense tells people that in order for a prisoner to become a reborn, he must first repent of the crimes he has committed. However, after Leung was released from prison, he only said that he "wanted to live a normal life", did not express remorse, did not apologize to the public, and did not express his abandonment of the "Hong Kong independence" position. If this is the case, why does Hong Kong society give him "space for rebirth"? Why does the mp for the manager say that "constantly talking about the past" would be "not very fair" to him? What logic is this!

Now there is a dark wind in Hong Kong, that is, no matter what the situation, no matter whether the perpetrators have remorse or not, as long as these Hong Kong rioters sit in prison and get out of prison, society must give them the opportunity and space to be reborn regardless of the three seven twenty-one, otherwise it is "unfair." Those who spread such remarks are either confused or pretending to be "good people" or have ulterior motives.

This article was originally published in Hong Kong's "Oriental Daily", the original title of "How to Release Prisoners without Remorse"