"In fact, I am not completely impulsive, and I still have some plans for this." After this bastard came out, he grabbed the furniture, chopped my hands, beat you and beat Xiaoyu, smashed the car, and bullied me five times before and after. I just wanted me to pat him five bricks. I didn't expect that this king would go down like that grandson. I don't want to put myself to death, I want to come out one day and see what my son looks like when he grows up. Sometimes, I'm also quite clever. ”
Du Hongjun, played by Fan Wei, is an honest car watcher. He had to go to the parking lot every night to see the car, the meager income, the hard work, the divorced marriage, the son of adolescence. The only bright color is probably the upcoming marriage with Xiao Song, played by Chen Xiaoyi. The two took wedding photos, bought furniture, prepared wedding rings, and lived a hard but warm life. Xiao Song opened a flower shop, and Xiao Yu, Du Hongjun's son, would ride a bicycle every morning to deliver flowers for Aunt Xiao Song before going to school. He didn't really want his dad to remarry, but he didn't want him to be unhappy either. Such a dull day is also tasteful.
But all this came to an abrupt end on the day that Xiao Song's ex-husband Liu San was released from prison early.
Du Hongjun's heart was beautiful
It turned out that Xiao Song had not yet formally gone through the divorce procedures with her ex-husband, she only let her ex-husband sign the divorce agreement when visiting the prison. Liu San is a complete rogue and a scoundrel, as soon as he got out of prison, he found Xiao Song's flower shop, raised his hand and threw out the flower pot and smashed the glass window of the flower shop. Later, he found Du Hongjun's home, just in time for Du Hongjun and Xiao Song to change furniture, and he called back Xiao Song without saying a word. Back at the flower shop, Liu San beat and scolded Xiao Song again, and also tore up the signed divorce agreement. The passing police saw that the glass window of the flower shop was broken, and came in to inquire, but Xiao Song did not mention liu san's scolding of himself just now.
Liu San in the flower shop
So why is there a paragraph at the beginning? That passage was said by Du Hongjun to Xiao Song in prison.
After Liu San was released from prison, he not only tortured Xiao Song, but also went to the door to remove the newly replaced furniture of Du Hongjun's house. Du Hongjun did not want to cause trouble and had been patient, but Xiao Yu was angry and went to him to settle the account, but in turn he was beaten by Liu San. The most infuriating thing is that Liu San found the parking lot where Du Hongjun was watching the car and smashed the glass of one of the cars inside. Du Hongjun saw what Liu San had done at the scene, but he couldn't catch him or catch up with him. Afterwards, the leader of the parking lot asked Du Hongjun to pay for the repair of the car, and Du Hongjun went to find Liu San, but Liu San did not admit it at all. Du Hongjun had no choice but to pay out of his own pocket and lose money for car repairs.
This went back and forth several times, and finally on the day of Xiaoyu's birthday, Du Hongjun broke out.
He first called 120 to call an ambulance, then walked into the flower shop and smashed Liu San, who was watching TV, to the ground with a brick.
As he said, he didn't want to commit a capital offense, so after seeing Liu San fall to the ground, he left the flower shop. Back home, he gave Xiaoyu a birthday, and the father and son duo pushed their hearts and talked a lot. The next day, Du Hongjun turned himself in.
Xiao Yu found Du Hongjun, who was locked up, and cried silently
Xiao Yu found Du Hongjun and cried and asked him why he couldn't bear it?
Yes, Xiaoyu was once caught fighting with a group of hooligans on the street because he was blocked by hooligans to grab money and was caught at the police station. At that time, the police asked Xiaoyu to write a check, but Xiaoyu refused, and Du Hongjun also advised him to endure and not to cause trouble. He also said that the hooligans did not do the right thing, and you are not right to fight with them. Why is he now doing the wrong thing without regard to his son, regardless of himself?
Xiao Yu also finally understood the meaning of his father's own patience at that time.
But why didn't Dad put up with it? He is obviously more patient.
Du Hongjun persuaded his son to write a check at the police station
Du Hongjun was not without patience. Like he said himself, he had endured it five times. However, Liu San persecuted him more and more seriously, and he could no longer see any retreat. His dearest people, his son and Xiao Song were bullied by Liu San, his own years of savings lost, his job was gone, what else did he have? As the saying goes, you can't deceive people too much, even if the rabbit is anxious, it will bite people.
Does Du Hongjun still have a choice? Maybe he could go to the police, but the police couldn't follow him twenty-four hours a day. Maybe he could resist Liu San when he bullied him again. But he really didn't have that strength. He couldn't beat Liu San, he couldn't run Liu San, how could he protect himself, protect his son and Xiao Song? The only thing he could think of was probably to sneak up on Liu San. Although this is not a clever solution, and in the end it is a lose-lose situation, but this seems to be his last choice.
Sad? Is it angry? Sigh?
Is an honest person like Du Hongjun, when he encounters a scoundrel like Liu San, doomed to a tragic ending?
In fact, it is not necessarily true, if Du Hongjun can use the last courage to face Liu San in the first few times, there may be no final tragedy.
Honest people are always used to forbearance, but forbearance does not necessarily calm people, but sometimes it encourages the arrogance of bad people. Instead of being forced to finally erupt intolerable ways, it is better to fight bravely when it is time to fight for your rights and interests.
Or earlier, if Xiao Song hadn't repeatedly tolerated Liu San, maybe all these things wouldn't have happened.
Kindness should not be equated with forbearance, and good people should be braver.