Tsai Ing-wen's "thesis gate" is about to reveal the truth? Taiwanese Scholar: LSE's statement is full of cats

In response to the "thesis gate" controversy of the leader of the Democratic Progressive Party authorities, Lin Huanqiang, a scholar in the United States, said on the 19th that he had officially sent a letter to the London School of Economics (LSE) through the British website "What Do They Know", requesting the withdrawal of the false statement posted on its official website for the endorsement of "fake doctor" Tsai Ing-wen on October 8, 2019. Sun Daqian, a former "legislator" who obtained a doctorate in the United States, said that if Lin Huanqiang walked to the ICO (the Office of the Information Ad hoc officer of the Royal Independent Agency of the United Kingdom) according to the rhythm, as long as the ICO was investigated in depth, the truth would soon come out.

Sun Daqian said in a Taiwan media program on the 20th that he believes that Lin Huanqiang's strategy can be successful, and the "Information Special Officer's Office" is a very important office for asset protection or personal asset confirmation in the Uk, as long as it is deeply investigated, the truth of the matter will soon come out.

Sun Daqian went on to say that when Tsai Ing-wen was studying, the London School of Economics was in the University of London, and then separated. So the University of London is now playing the game of "kicking the ball", and the LSE said that they did not have the relevant information on Dr. Tsai Ing-wen's oral examination, and they wanted to check the University of London, and the University of London said that it did not. There are no two, so where is this information, which is also a place where the outside world is now highly questioned.

Sun Daqian questioned that the LSE had a record of falsification in the past, and Tsai Ing-wen was not the only one. Tsai Ing-wen sent a copy of her doctoral dissertation to the University of London's Library of Parliament, if she really has a bound one, she should not only bind one, according to his previous experience, he will definitely prepare a few copies, to the guidance professor, or bring it back himself, but why did Tsai Ing-wen finally only have the pile of drafts left, and then send the relevant archives to the library's electronic file?

Shi Zhengfeng, a professor at Taiwan's Donghua University, also questioned in the program why the LSE's statement would come out, insiders should know that there is some catnip in it, and probably no one is willing to take that statement off the shelf. And this statement has nothing, except for the part without administrative staff, there is no content of the relevant committee of the oral examination, and Tsai Ing-wen's paper is also a mess, and there is no department, which is a strange thing.

Shi Zhengfeng said that it is reasonable to say that Tsai Ing-wen is now the leader of the Taiwan region, and even if she is an outstanding alumni, how can she not have those things. There are too many colleges in the University of London, what the LSE is playing with itself, why does the University of London want to help it to lie, so it uses technical help to deal with it.

Media person Peng Wenzheng mentioned on the program the "Teaching War Manual" that asked the University of London about the "Thesis Gate", that is, never mention the three words "Tsai Ing-wen". You can ask if it is possible for a person to get 1.5 Doctorates, and the University of London has no way to refuse to answer the question, but if you say "I want to know that Tsai Ing-wen is in so-and-so years...", as long as the three words "Tsai Ing-wen" are mentioned, it will tell you that this is personal privacy. Peng Wenzheng believes that for the University of London, they already know very well about Tsai Ing-wen. (Lin Jingxian/Editor)