The trees want to be quiet and the wind is not stopping!
When we usually analyze international political issues, most of them are overt exchanges, and holding meetings and exercises between countries, even if they are serious enough to send troops to fight wars, are actually all conspiracies. The so-called Yang conspiracy is to compete with soft power and hard power, and not to engage in the set of concealing the sky and crossing the sea.
But in the international game, in addition to the conspiracy, is there really no conspiracy to steal and slip?
In fact, the United States, which currently has the strongest soft and hard power in the world, is not inferior in engaging in conspiracies! A recent case in the field of intelligence in Denmark has once again led to the evil activities of the United States to eavesdrop on the world.
Recently, a Danish court confirmed that Lars Finsen, the former director of the Danish Defense Intelligence Agency, was arrested at Copenhagen Airport in December 2021 on suspicion of violating Article 109 of the Constitution for "leaking state secrets."
Once convicted, he faces up to 12 years in prison. But Finson himself declined to admit the allegations, telling reporters that "it's completely crazy."
First of all, let's briefly talk about the ins and outs of the matter, which must start from the "Prism Gate Incident".
In 2013, Edward Snowden, a former U.S. intelligence agency employee, revealed that U.S. intelligence had tapped the phone calls of many European dignitaries, including Merkel.
At that time, after the matter was exposed, it caused an uproar. The United States does not even trust and let go of even the most iron European allies, and it has simply reached the point of madness and six relatives!
The Independent Investigation Commission then found that the Danish National Intelligence Service had provided important help to the United States by giving the United States a "green light" to connect it to Denmark's submarine Internet cables, enabling it to eavesdrop on calls by top European officials.
Why Denmark? Because of Denmark's unique geographical location, north of Norway and Sweden, south of Germany, east of the United Kingdom, most of the European communication cables pass through here, making Denmark a global Internet hub.
Denmark, on the other hand, relied on its own geographical advantages to play a role for the United States. After the incident, the Danish National Intelligence Service argued that cooperation with the United States was "forced" because the U.S. demand was mandatory or even coercive.
However, the Danish government authorities have publicly stated that the National Intelligence Agency's move is "unacceptable" and have given the Defense Intelligence Agency a major change of blood, seemingly eager to break up the relationship.
But the suspicious thing is that the Defense Intelligence Service has been hiding from the government for so many years, and the Danish authorities are not aware of it. It can be speculated that this matter is nothing more than two situations.
First, the Danish authorities have long known and even supported intelligence cooperation with the United States, but they could not hang up behind the East Window incident, so they could only pretend not to know and use the National Intelligence Service as a shield.
The second is that if you really don't know it, it proves that there are very serious loopholes in the Danish state system, and the Defense Intelligence Agency's act of concealing the sky and crossing the sea is tantamount to treason.
If the investigation continues by the Independent Commission of Inquiry, it will naturally become clear what the situation will be, but at a certain point in time, it will suddenly stop and will not be investigated further.
Over the past many years, this matter has been full of doubts, not only the United States and Denmark are secretive, but even the Victims of European Politicians have kept their mouths shut.
Here, I will briefly give a few speculations for everyone to judge.
First, the Danish authorities were not only aware of it, but also had a covert exchange of interests with the United States.
Based on common sense, individuals tend to prefer the first scenario, where the Danish authorities sacrifice the leading members of the National Intelligence Service to clear responsibility and save face.
After all, the intelligence department is a key department in any country, and the top level must be firmly controlled. If intelligence can spy on other countries' dignitaries without the authorities, why not spy on the top brass of their own countries? Once the monopoly of intelligence power is established, it is easy to engage in subversion.
On the other hand, the Danish authorities must have known that the Intelligence Service was doing this. Moreover, the officials of this level of cooperative intelligence system are not qualified to talk about it, and it must be the result of private consultations between the higher levels of the Danish government and the top level of the United States, and the two sides have privately reached some exchange of interests.
Second, Finson's arrest was a political sacrifice.
The arrest of the former Danish defense intelligence chief Finson, pay attention to two details, one is that he was arrested at Copenhagen airport, indicating that he is probably preparing to run; the other is that he was arrested last December, but the information has not been made public, and it has only been confirmed in recent days. Why did you hide it for so long? What's happening these days?
It is likely that the Danish authorities further sacrificed Finson in order to spread the lie. Moreover, Finson was accused of "leaking state secrets," which was already treason, suggesting that he was disloyal to the state. The bad deeds of traitors naturally have nothing to do with the government authorities.
Third, U.S. global intelligence surveillance remains unchecked.
Why is the independent investigation not allowed to continue? Whose interests have been touched? After the Prism Gate incident, the United States deliberately turned its attention to Snowden, but whether it had withdrawn its surveillance of global politicians, the United States did not give a promise.
In the information age, data security and data independence are one of the most important sovereigns. This is also why China has vigorously promoted domestic communication software and hardware in recent years, and in some key areas, it is better to choose the next domestic equipment to ensure communication security.
The United States still does this to its allies, and you can imagine how despicable its methods are.