laitimes

Why do some people say that "flying to seize the Luding Bridge" is a forgery? History brooks no slander

May 1935 was destined to be an unusual month in Chinese history. For the sake of the future of the revolution, for the victory of the Long March, for the liberation of China, for the realization of the common ideals of the Chinese people. The heroic Workers' and Peasants' Red Army, after experiencing snowy mountains and dangerous land, came to the luding bridge. When the 22 living beings forged their flesh and blood into a brass wall to cover the bridge seizure operation. Even if we have not seen that scene with our own eyes today, even if that tragic history has passed for a full 85 years. But the revolutionary spirit of the heroes will not fall, and the Yangguan Avenue that the martyrs have opened up for us with their lives will not be forgotten by us.

Why do some people say that "flying to seize the Luding Bridge" is a forgery? History brooks no slander

However, what is chilling is that in recent years, many rumors questioning the "flying capture of Luding Bridge" have begun to circulate. They think history is a forgery and heroes are exaggerations.

Among them, the typical representative of the rumor, the British writer Zhang Rong, has repeatedly "quoted the scriptures" in public and said: "Flying to seize the Luding Bridge" was a oolong in the struggle for political rights at that time, and it was a fiction of a person with a heart. In this regard, in order to make his remarks convinced by others, he also listed two special strongholds.

First, overthrow historical strongholds.

Zhang Rong affirmed to the outside world that he visited the local people everywhere and consulted relevant materials. There was no war on the Luding Bridge at all, and when the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army arrived at the Luding Bridge on May 29, there was no shadow of the enemy army on the other side, and they walked over it warmly. She also took out an interview with the old man who had personally seen the meeting at that time, saying: In order to strengthen the momentum of its own crossing the bridge, the Red Army also specially released empty guns and cannons at the uninhabited place on the opposite side.

Why do some people say that "flying to seize the Luding Bridge" is a forgery? History brooks no slander

Second, distort the stronghold of the great man's speech.

Zhang Rong insisted that when Deng Gong met with Brzezinski in 1982, he took the initiative to admit that "flying to seize the Luding Bridge" was our own exaggeration, in order to publicize this heroic fighting spirit.

Third, borrow foreign literary strongholds.

She borrowed the "Long March of Two People" written by two Britons, Li Aide and Ma Pu'an, to say: The Red Army entered the battle from 8 o'clock in the morning, and at that time they actually arrested several innocent people as artificial shields in order to successfully cross the bridge.

Why do some people say that "flying to seize the Luding Bridge" is a forgery? History brooks no slander

In fact, Ma Rong's so-called strongholds that can prove that the "flying and capturing of Luding Bridge" are fraudulent and fraudulent, and no matter how you look at them, their remarks are a slander of history and an insult to heroes.

First, she initially said that the Red Army was not stopped by the enemy when crossing the Luding Bridge, and that it was her own slow walk. However, in the end, it was said that the Red Army actually used ordinary people as human shields in order to cross the bridge smoothly. It can be described as contradictory, and lies are self-defeating.

Second, too much language embellishment overturns its stronghold faster. Deng Gong only met Brzezinski in 1981, and his remarks at the time stated that In the many years of Self-redemption in China, there were many more brutal and fierce wars than this, and the seizure of the Luding Bridge was really nothing. Our view of him is only more propaganda, to propagate this tenacious, heroic fighting spirit that has the ability to defeat the enemy with an old-fashioned rifle. Zhang Rong deliberately distorted the remarks of the great man and turned a propaganda of the revolutionary spirit into Luding Bridge, which was actually not a war, which was an exaggeration at the time. Moreover, the "Flying Capture of Luding Bridge" incident is not just about the battle that captured the bridge. It also included the red army's heroic feat of braving heavy rain the night before, running through rugged mountain roads, experiencing a rain of bullets and bullets, and running 240 miles day and night.

Why do some people say that "flying to seize the Luding Bridge" is a forgery? History brooks no slander

Third, the Taiwan National History Museum has the original archives of that battle. Inside, a telegram sent to the general clearly described the combat situation at that time, saying that "the Li Regiment of Luding Bridge fought with bandits along the river." It can be seen that history will not deceive people, and those rumors questioning the Luding Bridge incident will eventually be washed away by time and evidence.

Read on